Nepean Hospital is offering free hepatitis B testing to women and babies who may have been exposed to the virus after a healthcare worker in the Birth Unit was found to be infectious. The Nepean Blue Mountains Local Health District (NBMLHD) is notifying 223 women who gave birth at the hospital between 2013 and 2024 about the potential low-risk exposure.While NSW Health has not identified any cases of transmission linked to the worker, NBMLHD said the concern this may cause for those affected and has extended its apologies.A review by the NSW Health Blood Borne Viruses Advisory Panel found the risk of transmission to be low for 223 women and 143 children. However, as a precaution, NBMLHD is offering free assessment and testing for hepatitis B to those who may have been exposed.Patients who underwent an episiotomy, a repair of an episiotomy or perineal/vaginal tear, or had a fetal scalp electrode applied during childbirth by the healthcare worker are being contacted.NBMLHD said it has worked with the healthcare worker to eliminate any further risk of transmission. The health district assures patients that Nepean Hospital’s birthing services remain committed to high-quality care in a safe environment.Hepatitis B is a liver disease caused by the hepatitis B virus. It can be transmitted through blood-to-blood contact, during birth, or through sexual contact. A blood test can determine if a person has an active infection or has had the virus in the past. Vaccination remains the best protection against hepatitis B.“Testing is important as there are now treatments available to prevent long-term complications of hepatitis B, and precautions can be taken to prevent the spread of infection to others,” NBMLHD said in a statement.“Nepean Blue Mountains Local Health District is committed to supporting the health and wellbeing of all women,” it said. Women who are unsure whether they may be at risk can call a dedicated support line on 1800 716 662 for further expert information and advice.Additional information on hepatitis B is available on the NSW Health website: NSW Health Hepatitis B Information.

After finishing primary school, Jean Aiken (Broadribb) was forced to find work on local farms around Maroota due to the lack of a school bus. Her mother had passed away just a few years earlier, leaving her in the part-time care of a next-door neighbour.Today, Jean celebrated her 100th birthday, surrounded by family, friends, and the dedicated nursing staff at Fitzgerald Aged Care in Windsor. Also in attendance were Federal Member Susan Templeman, Hawkesbury Mayor Les Sheather, and Reverend Chris Jones.  Proudly on display was a card from the King, containing a photograph of the Monarch and Queen Camilla.“It was such a fantastic day! It was more than I could have ever expected,” Jean’s daughter Joy told the Hawkesbury Post. ”Fitzgerald went above and beyond in creating a truly incredible celebration for mum and she was so happy,” she said.While surprised by all the fuss, Jean shared her secret to a long and fulfilling life: "helping others." Jean's journey has certainly embodied that philosophy. Born in Portland near Lithgow in 1925, she moved with her family to Glossodia before settling on a larger farm in Maroota in 1928, where they grew fruit and vegetables.At 17, Jean claimed to be 18 so she could enlist in the Voluntary Aid Detachment (VAD), serving as a nurse at Hawkesbury Hospital and the RAAF base hospital until the conclusion of World War II. After the war, she returned to farm work, where she met Sydney Aiken, whom she later married in 1948. The couple settled on her father’s farm in Maroota, taking on the responsibilities of running the business. They had two children, Bill and Joyce, and looked forward to the weekly dances at Maroota Hall.In 1955, the family relocated to Windsor to provide better schooling opportunities for their children. Syd resumed work as a plumber, while Jean dedicated herself to volunteer work. She became actively involved with the CWA and the Red Cross, frequently visiting patients in hospitals. She was also a longstanding member of St Matthew’s Church, continuing her involvement well into her 90s. In her free time, she enjoyed tennis and gardening.During the 1960s, financial difficulties led Jean to take a job at the Dowidat company in North Richmond. When her husband Syd passed away in April 1972, she continued working until the company eventually closed. Following her retirement, she traveled to New Zealand and the Pacific Islands and took up old-time dancing with her tennis friends. However, her passion for helping others remained strong - she soon returned to volunteering, visiting sick children in hospitals well into her 80s.Jean also dedicated 35 years to Meals on Wheels, serving the community with unwavering commitment. Her love for travel continued throughout Australia with friends. She now has five grandchildren and 12 great-grandchildren.“With all her socialising and volunteering, the garden never suffered. If anything, it got bigger as Jean got older,” Joy said.

Plans for a new pub and casino in the heritage village of Kurrajong Heights have been approved by the state's controversial planning panel, despite opposition from hundreds of residents and Hawkesbury Councillors. The decision, backed by Hawkesbury Council staff, paves the way for developer Bashir Merhi to proceed with a two-story venue featuring a pub, a VIP gaming lounge with up to 22 poker machines, nine accommodation cabins, and a 255-patron capacity. The project also includes parking for 75 cars and extended trading hours. The developer does not have any experience building and running pubs and is expected to try to sell the project with the approved DA.Residents began receiving emails from Hawkesbury Council today informing them of the approval. “At the Hawkesbury Local Planning Panel (HLPP) meeting dated 27 February 2025, the Panel resolved that the application be approved,” the email stated. The Notice of Determination is available on Council’s website..”Although all Hawkesbury Councillors opposed the initial development application, the final decision rested with the Planning Panel. Council staff recommended approval, arguing in business papers that the proposal aligns with the Local Environmental Plan and Development Control Plan."Council considers that the proposed development has been developed in line with the key objectives of planning regulations and remains in the public interest," the report states.However, community opposition was widespread, with more than 40 specific objections raised. Retired senior ecologist and Kurrajong Heights resident Nicola Trulock delivered a scathing critique of the project's supporting assessments at a planning panel meeting in February. Trulock, formerly a natural resource and interim bushfire management officer for the City of Parramatta Council, criticised the proposal for its significant omissions and inaccuracies.She also pointed out that both the Social Impact Assessment and the Statement of Environmental Effects were prepared by Balma Projects Pty Ltd - the very company seeking approval for the project."The display of bias is not surprising when you learn that both reports were prepared by Balma Projects Pty Ltd, the applicant for the DA. This is a clear-cut example of conflict of interest. Why did Hawkesbury Council not insist that these reports be rectified and prepared by an independent consultant?" she said.Residents' submissions raised concerns about poker machines, traffic congestion, tree removal, and the loss of Kurrajong Heights’ unique heritage. Yet, the Council’s report dismissed many of these concerns and suggested mitigation for others. Concerns about gambling were also dismissed, with the report claiming that gaming machines would require a separate Liquor and Gaming Authority application."The new DA is essentially a reworked version of the original proposal, with some modifications, but it remains a massive overdevelopment that is not compliant with the B1 zoning or the heritage requirements of Kurrajong Heights," Jeremy Braithwaite, leader of the Kurrajong Heights Heritage Committee, previously told the Hawkesbury Post.

Just four of the ten infrastructure projects promised under the $98 million WestInvest scheme for the Hawkesbury will be delivered in full, as funding shortfalls force major cuts, delays, or outright cancellations.Despite grand architectural drawings and assurances from elected representatives, it has now become clear that the funds allocated under the scheme, announced by the NSW Liberal Government in 2023, were never sufficient to build the projects as originally depicted. Hawkesbury City Council has confirmed that initial cost estimates were "substantially less" than what is now required, in part due to soaring construction and material costs.Councillor Nathan Zamprogno said the way these projects were sold to the community was misleading. “The last State election was fought with our elected representatives standing next to large photos of these architecturally lavish, fully-featured facilities. You’d have to say there’s an element of false advertising if now we’re being told that very few of them can be delivered as they were depicted.”Of the ten projects, the four that remain fully funded and on track for completion include Fernadell Park sports and community facilities in Pitt Town, Woodbury Reserve, the Kurrajong to Kurmond Cycleway, and upgrades to Turnbull Oval in North Richmond. A council spokesperson said Woodbury Reserve was the most progressed, with the Pump Track completed in August 2024. The tender process for Fernadell Park’s amenities and landscape construction closed in February 2025, with work expected to commence in autumn, weather permitting.However, the remaining six projects - including the much-anticipated new indoor pool at Richmond, upgrades to the Oasis Aquatic and Fitness Centre, North Richmond Community Precinct, Tamplin Field in Hobartville, and the Shared Path Cycleway over Rickabys Creek - face severe funding shortfalls. Council has acknowledged that these projects are now subject to further analysis, potential reductions in scope, or alternative funding solutions, all of which require state government approval.Zamprogno criticised the failure to account for cost inflation over the multi-year timeline of these projects. “Over the multi-year timeframes that these projects come to fruition, cost-inflation was absolutely something that should have been anticipated and factored in,” he said. “No one wants these to be cancelled or downsized, but in the context of Council’s broader financial situation, it irks that the State Government has created this problem only to blame Council for the disappointment.”Council now faces difficult decisions: whether to scale down projects, abandon some entirely to reallocate funds, or seek additional borrowing to deliver the infrastructure as originally promised. The extent of the funding gap has not been publicly disclosed, though it is believed to be in the tens of millions of dollars. The Hawkesbury Post has lodged a Government Information Public Access (GIPA) request to obtain details of the shortfall after Council refused to disclose the figures voluntarily.Compounding the issue, each completed facility will bring ongoing maintenance costs that were never accounted for within the WestInvest grant, further straining Council’s already fragile financial position. Hawkesbury Councillor Mary Lyons-Buckett has long been critical of such projects failing to budget for longterm maintenance of facilities. Even before these projects, Council faced a $163 million infrastructure maintenance deficit over the next nine years, meaning additional rate increases may soon be required.“These were facilities that the community were promised,” Zamprogno said. “Now, instead of seeing these grand designs come to life, we’re left with a significantly diminished set of projects and the ongoing issue of how maintenance on any community projects will be funded.”In response to questions from the Hawkesbury Post, a Council spokesperson stated that extensive cost management strategies had been implemented, including collaboration with designers and quantity surveyors to find savings. “Initial cost estimates, based on conceptual designs, used at the time funding was applied for, were substantially less than what is now required to deliver these projects... The shortfall is simply due to construction and material costs increasing substantially.”While Council maintains it is seeking additional funding and exploring ways to keep projects alive, it is clear that residents will not receive the infrastructure they were promised when the scheme was announced. 

Fifteen years ago, with the birth of his first daughter, Jared Doolan made a pivotal decision: to leave his role as a project manager at Australia's largest plumbing company and establish his own venture, Doolan Plumbing. "I wanted to provide a better life for my family," Jared shares, highlighting the personal motivation behind this significant career move.Today, Doolan Co success can be put down to two things - Jared's dedication and resilience. The company has grown to employ 140 staff members and boasts a vast array of machinery. "We're probably one of the biggest businesses in the Hawkesbury," Jared said highlightingit’s substantial presence in the region.The journey, however, has not been without its challenges. The COVID-19 pandemic posed significant hurdles, with material costs soaring by 25% and a scarcity of projects. "We were losing a lot of money during that period," Jared recalls. The company faced the difficult decision to reduce its workforce by half. Yet, through adaptability and swift evolution, they navigated the crisis. "It made me and my business much more resilient," he said, emphasising the growth that emerged from adversity.Jared attributes much of his success to his upbringing. "My dad died when I was 22, and I just wanted better for me and my own family," he shares. This drive has been a cornerstone of his perseverance and determination to overcome obstacles.Doolan Co specialises in all commercial plumbing, government infrastructure, commercial maintenance and Civil construction. The company evolved from just plumbing and has re Branded to just Doolan and dedicated teams for each area, ensuring that clients receive expert services tailored to their specific needs. This specialisation has been a key factor in the company's growth and reputation in the industry.A cornerstone of Doolan’s success is its strong team culture. Jared said, "The best part about it is I've got such a good team around me, and we're all really close friends and we love coming to work." To celebrate and acknowledge the dedication of long-standing team members, the company hosts an annual Christmas party. During this event, employees and their families come together to celebrate achievements and milestones. A highlight of the gathering is the presentation of awards to the 5 and 10 years clubs, this year we will have 15 year club members.Jared's leadership philosophy centers on empowering his management team, allowing them to share the responsibilities and pressures of running the business. He notes, "The business is actually in a really good spot, where a lot of the pressures taken away from me and taken on by other management team." Beyond the business, Jared is deeply embedded in the community. Residing in Wilberforce with his wife, Ursula, and their five children, he serves on the boards of the Windsor Wolves Rugby League Club and the Marana Aboriginal Community Group. He also dedicates time to coaching and training his children's sports teams.For those aspiring to embark on entrepreneurial ventures, Jared offers candid advice: "Running a business is extremely hard. If you think you've got the mindset to be resilient and keep pushing forward, give it a go." 

James Francis, once a corporate debt collector, found himself yearning for a more fulfilling career. Trading his office attire for work boots, James embarked on a journey into the world of weed management, a sector facing a critical shortage of skilled professionals.“I was something of a ‘digital bounty hunter’. If people owed the company money, it was my job to find them online and get in touch with them. This job wasn’t a good fit for me,” Francis said.The Hawkesbury River County Council (HRCC), overseeing weed control across the Hawkesbury-Nepean region, has been proactive in addressing this workforce gap. General Manager Chris Dewhurst said that the sector has "at least doubled in size in the last 25 years," driven by heightened awareness of invasive species' impacts on both the environment and economy.To cultivate talent, HRCC offers hands-on traineeships, providing aspiring weed control officers with practical experience while they pursue necessary certifications. Since 2012, this initiative has produced over 19 graduates, all of whom have secured positions within the industry.Francis’ transition is just one example of the program's success. After enrolling in a TAFE course on Conservation and Ecosystem Management, he joined HRCC as a trainee, gaining invaluable field experience. The HRCC offered a flexible program where he could work as a Weed Control Trainee while completing his study. Upon completing the program, James quickly advanced within the team and now mentors new trainees.The course was offered under the NSW Government’s Fee-Free TAFE initiative, which provides free courses relating to industries that are facing skills shortages.But it's not just about providing training, there is urgency in this work. Challenges such as recent flooding in the Hawkesbury-Nepean region, has exacerbated the spread of invasive aquatic weeds. In response, HRCC has integrated new solutions, including the use of drones for efficient mapping and early detection of weed clusters. This technology enhances their ability to manage and mitigate the spread of harmful species, protecting local ecosystems and agriculture.For those like Francis, the combination of a fulfilling career and the opportunity to make a tangible environmental impact makes weed management a compelling field, “I was working in a concrete jungle disconnected from nature, and it made me realise that above all else, I wanted my career to have a positive impact on the world around me,” Francis said.HRCC's approach not only addresses the immediate need for skilled professionals but also fosters a new generation committed to preserving Australia's natural landscapes.

Hawkesbury City Council (HCC) has finally admitted the failure of their own drains was the cause of the catastrophic collapse of the river levee at Cornwallis. NSW taxpayers will now foot a multi-million dollar bill for repairs.In its first full update on the remediation works at Cornwallis, HCC blamed old “1970s” pipes and flooding for the disaster, which began in March 2021.. The collapse of the river bank cost local turf and horse farmers tens of millions of dollars in property damage and lost business.The environmental damage was so significant that a 2022 NSW Parliamentary flood inquiry described the collapsed river levee at Cornwallis as “major destruction.”“That is not a pothole. That is a grand canyon in the middle of Sydney. This is Sydney. It is major destruction. Why are you not onto the State Government and saying, "This is beyond our capability?" Inquiry Chair Walt Secord said. “This is major erosion. It is changing the course of the river. When we were there, we were warned not to go too close to the edge because it may, in fact, snap off. Heaven forbid, as more rains come, there will be more erosion. Can you understand why those farmers are so worried? They have seen their land values drop. They have seen their properties wash away. Can you see why they are upset?” In a media release today - almost four years after the first cracks appeared in the Hawkesbury’s bank - HCC painted a different view of the damage. A far cry from the “canyon” Secord described after visiting the site in 2022, HCC today described the formation of a “small bay” when the “1970s drainage system” collapsed.“The initial damage at Cornwallis was caused by the March 2021 flood in the Hawkesbury River, with the 1970s drainage system failing as a result of that event. Subsequent flooding in 2022 caused further erosion and the breaching of the riverbank, resulting in a small bay forming. A 180-metre section of Cornwallis Road was also lost,” the HCC media release said. It also failed to mention the millions of dollars of ratepayers' money - and council time - that was wasted when they ordered the wrong pipes for the job.The Hawkesbury Post wrote to Hawkesbury Council on 9 and 14 January this year, inquiring about about the progress of the works at Cornwallis, requesting photos to show landholders of the progress. The Council did not respond to either email.The broader damage at Cornwallis was caused after the council and Liberal state government failed to make a fairly straightforward repair to Cornwallis Road after it collapsed during the March 2021 flood.Residents had warned the council that further damage to the road and environment by not repairing it before the next flood, would be extensive and the cost to local businesses substantial flood.When the floods came again in March 2022, the road was not repaired. The damage to the road, riverbank, and farmland was catastrophic. Subsequent floods worsened the damage each time, with water filling up the lowlands before resuming its natural course down the river. Turf farmers at Pitt Town have noted that it takes hours longer for floodwaters to reach them since the collapse of the river levee.Work to repair the damage has been slow, with various levels of government and multiple government departments grappling with how to repair the mess. Federal Member for Maquarie Susan Templeman said she welomed the work by the nSW Government and Hawkesbury Council to finally get the job underway.“This has been a tortuous process for the landowners and the turf growers and farmers affected by not just the initial flood damage in 2020 but the subsequent worsening of the issue because of the delay in repairing it," Templeman said. “It’s highlighted that councils alone may not have the capacity to manage major disaster reconstruction, particularly those projects running into the many millions of dollars. I think lessons have been learned at both a local and state government level. “The landowners and growers affected have demonstrated tremendous patience in the face of repeated delays. Like them, I can’t wait to see the work concluded," she said.The drainage system across the Lowlands and Cornwallis has been a longstanding issue. The damaged and unmaintained infrastructure continues to worsen flood damage in the area. Despite Hawkesbury City Council hiring consultancy firm Molino Stewart as far back as 2022 to assess and propose solutions. Yet the community is still waiting to see the final report on how to fix the system.A draft Molino Stewart report obtained by the Hawkesbury Post through a GIPA (formerly known as Freedom of Information) suggest that resolving the drainage issue might take a long time or may not happen at all. The draft report dated 3 January 2024 indicates that much of the landscape has changed irreversibly."It is possible that some of the changes to the landscape cannot practically be reversed or mitigated, and so the impacts that have been sustained following the recent floods will continue after every flood," the draft report concluded.The report attributes the drainage issues to two main factors: the failure of landowners or the Council to maintain flood mitigation and drainage infrastructure, and on-farm practices that have altered the topography or drainage pathways."Both of these sets of contributors include actions or inactions that have taken decades to incrementally create the current situation. This includes the gradual deterioration of infrastructure or the lowering or raising of paddocks, principally through turf farming," the draft report states.HCC said that restoration of Cornwallis Road and drainage works will begin this month adding that Council had "collaborated with the NSW Reconstruction Authority, NSW Public Works, and the EPA to design a long-term drainage and road repair solution."The project, funded by the Australian and NSW Labor Governments, is expected to take 30 weeks, with completion targeted for September 2025, "weather permitting." The cost was not advised by HCC but the Hawkesbury Post understands that it now runs into the tens of millions.

At just over three months old, Mirri - the first clouded leopard cub born in Australia - is proving to be a fighter. Born in November during an intense heatwave that saw temperatures soar to 47°C, Mirri has already transformed from a vulnerable 180‐gram newborn into a two kilogram bundle of energy, delighting conservationists at the Wild Cat Conservation Centre.“Mirri continues to amaze us with her incredible progress over the last couple of months,” said Director Ben Britton. “This little fighter has officially hit the two kilogram mark - a huge milestone considering her humble beginnings.” Despite a rocky start, the cub has quickly become a symbol of resilience and hope for the centre’s ambitious conservation efforts.Mirri’s early days were challenging. Delivered breech with only her tail visible for 20 nerve-wracking minutes, followed by an equally stressful six hour period, as the conservation team watched on remote cameras for signs that Mirri was alive and that Moana (her mum) was caring for her. After six hours Mirri had not suckled, normally a cub would suckle within one to two hours of being born. Moana then left the den box and abandoned Mirri so the team had to make the tough decision to step in. “While the ideal scenario would have been to see her thriving alongside her mum, we are absolutely thrilled that she has not only survived but thrived despite her rocky start,” Britton said.A critical factor in Mirri’s survival has been the centre’s innovative approach to her development. Since a maternal bond was never established - Moana did not provide the necessary early nourishment - Mirri cannot be reunited with her parents, Mark and Moana. “Any attempt to reintroduce her could potentially be fatal, as Mark and Moana no longer recognise Mirri as their offspring,” Britton noted.Instead, the centre is fostering Mirri’s natural leopard behaviours through gradual exposure to an outdoor habitat alongside resident clouded leopards Tai and Cinta. The young cub is now spending increasing amounts of time outside, where she is learning to navigate the complexities of her environment - from confidently running and climbing to even making sense of the rain, which she finds both “fascinating (and slightly confusing!).”Looking ahead, the centre plans to extend her outdoor time further, with expectations that Mirri will transition to living outside permanently by mid-year. Visitors to the sanctuary may soon catch a glimpse of the spirited cub, whether in the nursery or exploring her evolving habitat.Mirri’s story represents a significant step forward for clouded leopard conservation in Australia and globally. As part of a critically important, genetically diverse population managed in captivity, Mirri’s future is being carefully planned in collaboration with both the European Endangered Species Programme (EEP) and the United States’ Species Survival Plan (SSP). “Early indications suggest that Mirri may head to the United Kingdom later this year to be paired with a young male cub,” Britton revealed. “Introducing unrelated cubs at a young age is crucial for establishing strong bonds and supporting successful future breeding efforts.”This potential international move marks a pivotal moment in the global recovery efforts for clouded leopards. Meanwhile, the centre remains optimistic about the future of its breeding program. Mark and Moana, despite the challenges with Mirri, are expected to mate again this winter, with the possibility of welcoming a new litter around September. “We’re hopeful that, with experience on their side, Mark and Moana will raise their next litter together without intervention,” Britton said..For over eight years, the Wild Cat Conservation Centre has dedicated itself to the care and study of clouded leopards - enigmatic creatures known for their elusive nature and specialised care requirements. As Australia’s only facility approved to work with these magnificent wild cats, the centre has overcome numerous logistical hurdles, including international transfers and delays due to COVID-19, to build a state-of-the-art breeding program that is being recognised globally..The Centre hopes that Mirri’s journey, offers hope for her own species and helps show the importance of conservation work to protect some of the planet’s most vulnerable creatures.

Transport for NSW has dismissed concerns that the Richmond Bridge upgrade has overlooked critical heritage impacts, stating that the project can proceed. However, recent reviews of the Richmond Bridge Review of Environmental Factors (REF) and Statement of Heritage Impact (SoHI) have revealed that essential heritage evaluations were never conducted for the historic 1820 stock route road built by William Cox - an omission experts say could undermine the project's legitimacy.Investigations show that heritage assessments were absent not only in earlier decision-making phases, including the options selection process, but also in the current REF and SoHI documentation. Of particular concern is the failure to identify or assess the Macquarie-era stock route road, despite explicit advice from Heritage NSW.“The heritage impacts of this proposal have been misrepresented,” said Penny Sharpe, owner of the historic Durham Bowes home, one of the properties directly affected by the new widened road at Inalls Lane. “We have been asking for five years: Where are those assessments? We had advice from the Minister that the assessment would be part of the REF. It isn’t. Why is there no assessment of these significant heritage items? Why didn’t the consultants include it in the Statement of Impact?”Sharpe also noted that the Environmental Defenders Office has previously warned that any decision or approval made without the requisite heritage assessments could be legally void. While this advice came from an unrelated proposal, she said it raises serious questions about the integrity of government-funded projects moving forward.Community members argue that failing to conduct these assessments breaches obligations under Section 5.1 of the Environmental Planning and Assessment Act (EP&A Act) and contradicts guidance from Heritage NSW.The Chair of the Australian Garden History Society told the Hawkesbury Post they had written to NSW Minister about the inadequate process of the Transport NSW review of environmental factors for the project and asked her to urgently consider the heritage significance of the cultural landscape of the neighbourhood not just the actual project site. They are still waiting for a reply.Transport for NSW told the HP that the assessment in the REF has found stock routes could be historically significant. However, they concluded it is unlikely that archaeological remains of stock routes would be present in most of the project area, particularly around Inalls Lane and Southee Road, where the main stock routes historically ran.“This is due to these routes being previously adapted to become vehicle thoroughfares, along with other uses over time,” Transport for NSW stated. “The assessment considers the proposed project would be unlikely to uncover remains as the project would be mostly built above existing ground levels.”TfNSW said that Sections 8 and 9 of the SoHI identify potential impacts along with mitigation measures for relic management if anything is uncovered. Transport for NSW maintains that the project can proceed under the REF without requiring an Environmental Impact Statement (EIS).However, Sharpe rejected this response, arguing that Transport for NSW has effectively dismissed the significance of the 1820 road built by William Cox. “This was part of the first stock route to the north and evidence of early expansion of the colony,” she said. “Its significance is greater than just archaeological remains and requires a proper assessment against the Heritage Council of NSW criteria to fully understand its level of significance. Transport is required to provide these assessments under its obligations in Section 5.1 of the EP&A Act.”With heritage concerns remaining unresolved, the project’s approval process faces increasing scrutiny, as community members and heritage advocates demand a full and transparent assessment before construction proceeds.

As 2025 unfolds, it’s the perfect time to review your will and important estate documents - an often overlooked but necessary task to ensure your wishes are carried out smoothly when the time comes. While discussing matters of death and inheritance may feel uncomfortable, the consequences of neglecting your estate planning can be far worse, both emotionally and financially. “Discussing your will and estate plans can be a morbid task, however it is a necessity for a swift and efficient resolution of your estate assets when you die,” Kate Rafton, Managing Director at Rafton Family Lawyers said.As local legal professionals in the Hawkesbury, Rafton Family Lawyers we have seen firsthand the heartache and financial burden caused by outdated or non-existent wills. Families have faced thousands of dollars in legal fees - money that could have been preserved and invested in the well-being of loved ones.So why should you update your will and estate documents? Here are a few key reasons:Life Changes: If your personal circumstances change—such as remarrying or entering a new relationship—your will may no longer be valid, even if the terms remain the same. A quick update ensures it reflects your current life situation.Property Settlements: If you've undergone a property settlement with an ex-spouse but have not yet finalized your divorce, an ex-partner could still claim a stake in your estate if you pass away without a current will. It's crucial to update your documents after such events to avoid complications.Age Milestones: When your children or dependents turn 18, it’s a good time to reassess who should act as the executor of your will. As they grow, you may want to consider updating these roles to reflect your family's changing dynamics.Special Needs Considerations: If you have adult children with special needs, it’s essential to plan for their long-term care and support. Estate planning can ensure their future housing, healthcare, and financial needs are met.Windfalls and Investments: Coming into a large sum of money—whether through an inheritance, business success, or a financial windfall—calls for tailored estate planning. A thorough update to your will can protect these funds for future generations.“We recommend reviewing your will every 4-5 years, especially if any significant changes have occurred in your life,” Rafton said. “We’re here to help you navigate these important matters. Our team, with offices across Western Sydney and a local office in Richmond, offers a supportive approach to estate planning. We encourage you to reach out to us for a consultation and ensure your estate plan is up to date.”Kate Rafton, Managing Director of Rafton Family Lawyers, leads a team of expert wills and estates lawyers ready to assist you. For inquiries, call us at 02 8607 7184 or email [email protected]. We're here to help you protect your legacy.Sponsored Content

During the COVID-19 pandemic, while many were perfecting sourdough recipes, Steph Brown discovered a passion for pottery. She began by hiring a small pottery wheel and, through months of self-guided practice and YouTube tutorials, honed her skills. This journey led her to establish Tasman Clayworks, a pottery school in Windsor Mall, which opened in late 2023."I hired a wheel during COVID and then bought one quickly, just a little baby one, and spent months just practising and just learning from YouTube tutorials and practising for months,” Steph said. Although primarily self-taught, she also attended professional classes to understand effective teaching methods and to shape the offerings at Tasman Clayworks.In August 2023, Steph and her team made a swift decision to open a shop in Windsor Mall. She recalled, "We crash-landed into that shop in the mall in August 2023 after making a split-second decision to go and find a shop. That was on Monday, and we had the shop by Friday."Tasman Clayworks offers a variety of classes, including beginner taster sessions, "Wheels and Wine" parties for groups, and ongoing classes. What sets Tasman Clayworks apart is its ability to bring people together. Steph said. "We've had everyone from a 90-year-old and her family, to Hen's nights and baby showers to grandparents bringing their grandchildren."While "Wheels and Wine" classes are typically social events for groups or families, individuals are also welcome. Steph mentioned, "If there's an extra person, I've had no problems with them fitting into a group whatsoever. In fact, they all get together and have a little laugh at what they've made."Many students return to continue their pottery journey, moving from six-week beginner classes to advanced lessons. Steph said. Beyond teaching, Steph creates and sells her handcrafted pieces at her Windsor Mall shop and local markets. Her work has been particularly successful at the Hills Markets at Wiseman's Ferry, Bella Vista Farm, and the Redbank Market in North Richmond, where she plans to return this year, schedule permitting.For class bookings or to view Steph's pottery collection, visit Tasman Clayworks at 181 George Street in Windsor Mall or book a class online at https://www.tasmanclayworks.com/classes.If you know of an interesting business or person doing great things in the Hawkesbury region, please email or DM us, and we will get in touch.

Hawkesbury City Council's latest financial report card reveals a challenging landscape where a budgetary shortfall of $1.3 million has been offset partially by external one-off payments.The December 2024 Quarterly Budget Review Statement showed that key revenue streams are facing downward pressure, that costs have blown out in a number of areas and that HCC continues to frustrate ratepayers as it drags its feet on compliance and continues to over-rely on external consultants.A noticeable slump in building compliance revenue is impacting the bottom line, with the report stating that "the number of fines is below the budgeted amount," leading to a $208,000 deficit. “Enforcement & compliance squeeze is the squeakiest of squeaky wheels in council”, Councillor Nathan Zamprogno told the Hawkesbury Post. “I get more complaints about this than any other issue. People are waiting for too long for compliance orders and enforcement.Similarly, a decline in complying development income, stemming from fewer projects, has contributed to a $202,000 deficit in that budget line, with the Review saying there is a reduced revenue as "the number of complying developments is lower than budgeted for".. These shortfalls suggest a need for close attention to “development sector trends” and the effectiveness of “regulatory enforcement”, the council states, begging the question about how a local government entity is not on top of such trends.Operational costs are also climbing at the Companion Animal Shelter. As authorities reveal that the shelter "is operating at capacity" which has increased operating expenses to exceed the initial budget allocations by $262,000. This increase is primarily due to the Shelter "operating at capacity" and increased labour and veterinary costs. HCC opens its shelter to other councils that do not have them, a key reason behind its capacity and raising the question about whether costs are being recovered effectively.The number of development applications that require consultants has further affected Development Assessment consultancy fees, and also contributed to a drag on funds.“Council makes too much use of external consultants, and not enough on cultivating well qualified people in the organisation,” Cr Zamprogno said.The downturn in Development Applications is further compounded as "the number of Construction Certificate applications has been lower than expected", which has reduced the income received. The revenue losses caused by the shortfall of Development Applications is recorded at $131,000, followed by $109,000 in lost Construction Certificate income.Other unfavourable adjustments to the budget included Consultancy fees for Heritage works ($64,000), Development Assessment casuals ($56,000), Sewage Management Facility reinspection fees ($50,000) and Occupation Certificates ($50,000).However, the Council's Investment Portfolio has "exceeded budget expectations" by $611,000, offsetting some revenue shortfalls. This positive outcome is "due to higher interest rates obtained and higher than budgeted funds to invest." Revenue was also boosted, due to a number of “favourable adjustments” i.e. one-off windfall payments such as a $649,000 reimbursement received from Transport for NSW for “Recovery of Natural Disaster Expenses” (April 24). Leaseback changeover costs are down by $271,000, Property Lease Rental lower by $168,000, and the Emergency Services Levy was $154,000 lower than budget. There was also another windfall of $87,000 from an Insurance Settlement from Storm Damage in 2020. The offloading of the running of the Lower Portland Ferry to the State government saw another $171,000 windfall in savings.In regard to cash assets, the " projected financial position at 30 June 2025 will be satisfactory at year end, having regard to the projected estimates of income and expenditure and the original budgeted income and expenditure as shown in Council's accounting records". The review also states “factors outside the Council’s control” could impact the end of year financial position, without detailing any of these factors. The Council forecast that it would end the year in a “satisfactory” short-term position. 

Starting April 1, 2025, the Australian Taxation Office (ATO) will require about 3,500 small businesses with a history of tax issues - like late payments or incorrect reporting - to switch from quarterly to monthly Goods and Services Tax (GST) reporting.ATO Deputy Commissioner Will Day emphasized the importance of staying on top of tax obligations, noting that monthly GST reporting can reduce the risk of falling behind.However, this shift comes at a challenging time for many small businesses already dealing with rising costs and administrative burdens. The move to monthly reporting could increase these pressures, requiring more time and resources to manage the frequent filings.The ATO acknowledges that while some businesses have voluntarily adopted monthly reporting to improve cash flow and streamline processes, the mandatory nature of this change may not be as beneficial for all. Affected businesses will be notified in writing and will remain on the monthly reporting cycle for at least 12 months.Small business advocates express concern that this measure could disproportionately impact enterprises already struggling to stay afloat. They argue that, instead of imposing additional reporting requirements, the ATO should consider more supportive measures to assist businesses in meeting their obligations without adding to their administrative load.As the implementation date approaches, small business owners are encouraged to consult with their tax professionals to prepare for the transition and address potential challenges associated with the new reporting requirements.ATO Deputy Commissioner Will Day said when GST is reported monthly rather than quarterly it reduces the risk of falling behind."We recognise most small businesses try to do the right thing. Our goal is to help small business owners get their tax and super obligations right by providing transparency on the areas we are focused on," Day said."The ATO has a responsibility to level the playing field, as small business owners rightfully expect us to ensure fair competition and compliance.""If you’re a small business who continues to deliberately disregard your obligations, you can expect the ATO to move you to more frequent GST reporting," he said.The ATO said the ‘Getting it right’ campaign, will also focus on contractors in the building and construction, cleaning, courier and road freight, information technology (IT), or security, investigation or surveillance industries, omitting income.

..

In a rare show of unity Hawkesbury City Councillors have unanimously opposed the NSW Government's proposed Richmond Bridge duplication project design, echoing widespread community concerns about its potential negative impacts on local communities and the Hawkesbury River floodplain. During a recent council meeting, councillors criticised the project's design, funding shortfalls, and potential threats to heritage sites, arguing that the current proposal fails to provide adequate flood immunity or traffic relief.The discussion took place at Council’s monthly meeting where councillors were considering Council’s submission about the project to Transport for NSW during the community consultation period, which has now closed.Councillors expressed particular concern over the plan to construct a four-lane bridge with two-lane approaches, warning that this configuration could create traffic bottlenecks rather than alleviate congestion. The proposed removal of roadside parking on Bells Line of Road at North Richmond and the introduction of traffic lights at the intersection of Kurrajong Road, Yarramundi Lane, and Old Kurrajong Road - instead of a flyover -were also points of contention. Additionally, the omission of an upgrade to Redbank Creek Bridge on Bells Line of Road was highlighted as a significant oversight.Funding emerged as a critical issue, with councillors condemning the state's failure to secure full financing for the project. The current plan would divert bypass traffic through existing roads in Hobartville, particularly Southee Road, until additional funds are obtained, raising concerns about increased noise and traffic for local residents. Moreover, the proposal to build a bridge and elevated road sections without comprehensive modeling of potential flood impacts on nearby properties and the broader floodplain has alarmed both officials and community members.The proposed route via Inalls Lane and Southee Road has faced opposition due to anticipated noise, increased traffic, and threats to numerous heritage sites, including the Macquarie-era cultural landscape and the State Heritage-listed Hobartville Stud and St Peter's Church Group. Councillor Mary Lyons-Buckett, who introduced the motion, echoed the community's frustration. “We are talking about a major exit route out of Sydney to the west and we require an outcome in line with its importance, which is complete and adequately funded to deliver a viable project to improve traffic congestion and improve flood immunity,” Clr Lyons Buckett said.“Here we have a proposal, incomplete in its capacity to be delivered in its entirety about which there is a broad range of concerns. We don’t want to see a half-baked project proceed.“We need a solution that is for the future. We don’t want nor do we deserve a second-rate solution in the Hawkesbury,” she said.Mayor Les Sheather urged the community to get involved: “We will do our best as a Council to get the best outcome. I would suggest to the community, if you have concerns then write your submissions in. Council can’t do this on its own, and submissions from the community will make a big difference,” Clr. Shealther said.

On Saturday, February 22, 2025, the Scheyville Veterans, Families & Community Centre celebrated its official opening, marking a significant milestone in the restoration of the historic Scheyville site. The event was attended by over 120 guests, including veterans, their families, and community members, who gathered to honor the rich military history of the area.The restoration project, spearheaded by Taskforce Veteran (formerly Hunter Anzac Memorial Limited), has revitalised several key structures on the site - two large SSARs huts, once used as the Cadets’ Mess and kitchen, and the gymnasium. The external cypress pine timber was sourced from a timber mill in Forbes, ensuring the new timber matches the original profile of the external walls. Dulux Paints Australia contributed by matching the original external paint color, now known as "Scheyville Military Heritage Blue," and donated 15,000 liters of paint for the project.The interiors have been refurbished, retaining original light fittings and doorknobs, with basins re-enamelled and broken windows repaired. A new roof has been installed over the kitchen area in the Western SSARs hut, and new internal linings have been added.The Eastern SSARs hut, previously the gymnasium, has been transformed into a versatile space capable of hosting up to 400 guests for functions. The timber floor has been repaired, sanded, and oiled, while vinyl flooring has been laid over the concrete floor in the remainder of the hut. A disabled toilet has been installed, new paths laid to cater for mobility scooters, and essential services such as plumbing, electrical installations, and fire extinguishers have been updated.A new memorial garden has been established on the site where officers once served, providing a space for reflection and remembrance. The beer garden between the two SSARs huts has also been restored, featuring a new pond, retaining wall, sandstone tiles, and specially made steel settee seats engraved with the names of Officer Training Unit officers killed in action during the Vietnam War.The Western SSARs hut will house a collection of armoured vehicles and a "Scheyville Base Support Workshop," equipped with tools and lathes to support Taskforce Veteran's operations. The Eastern SSARs hut will feature an exhibition showcasing the various inhabitants of the Scheyville site over the past 150 years, including the Officer Training Unit.The restoration has been made possible through a $5 million federal funding commitment from the Albanese Government, initially promised by the Morrison Government. Brett Wild, Chairman of Taskforce Veteran, expressed gratitude to local suppliers and tradespeople for their contributions, as well as to Susan Templeman MP and Robyn Preston MP for their ongoing support.“It was very special to be able to cut a ribbon marking an enormous effort led by Brett Wild to bring his vision for Scheyville to life,” Templeman said. “By working with local builders like Lachlan Matthews of Allscope, Brett’s team has worked wonders on what were sad and almost derelict buildings. “There’s more work to do, but they should be very proud of the transformation to date, and I look forward to a continued strong relationship with NSW NPWS as these building which carry so much military and migrant history are given another lease on lifeThe official opening ceremony featured speeches from distinguished guests, including Major General Paul Irving AM, PSM, RFD (Ret’d), a former graduate of the Officer Training Unit at Scheyville. Susan Templeman MP, The Hon David Harris MP, and Robyn Preston MP also addressed the attendees, highlighting the significance of the restoration and the centre’'s role in honoring the site's military heritage.

The anticipated rubber-stamping by the NSW Planning Panel of a modern pub and casino in the historic enclave of Kurrajong Heights - despite 373 local objections and a unanimous council vote against it - is a glaring testament to a flawed system. This scenario underscores the pressing need to overhaul a planning process that not only sidelines community input but also tramples on local democracy, all while appearing to sideline local planning regulations.In 2017, the NSW Government, in its infinite wisdom, transferred decision-making authority on most development applications from elected local councillors to so-called independent Local Planning Panels (LPPs). This move, ostensibly aimed at enhancing transparency and reducing conflicts of interest, has effectively muzzled community influence over local developments. Councillors, directly accountable to residents, have been replaced by panels often populated with individuals who may not even reside in the area and lack any semblance of accountability to its inhabitants. Notably, the majority of panel members are appointed by the Minister for Planning, raising more questions than answers about the panels' purported independence.The Kurrajong Heights debacle epitomizes this disconnect. Despite overwhelming community opposition, the Planning Panel appears poised to greenlight the project. This decision not only dismisses the community's vehement opposition to the ludicrous proposition of a second pub and gambling venue in a small historic village but also begs the question: why do local planning regulations seem irrelevant in this case? One might wonder, who is this process truly designed to serve?Local resident and former natural resource and interim bushfire management officer for the City of Parramatta Council, Nicola Truscot, recently lambasted the proposal for its glaring omissions and inaccuracies. In a scathing address to the Hawkesbury Local Planning Panel, she highlighted the absence of an ecological impact assessment, despite potential effects on habitats for up to 23 endangered species in the area. The vegetation classification was erroneously labeled, leading to a perilous underestimation of bushfire hazards. Moreover, the Social Impact Assessment and Statement of Environmental Effects conveniently failed to mention the incompatible land use (pub/casino) due to its proximity to St David’s Church. More troubling is that both assessments were prepared by Balma Projects Pty Ltd, the very company seeking approval for the project. The irony is, the project may never be built and is likely just a profiteering exercise to inflate the land's value for the developer, in this case, Bashir Merhi. A similar charade is unfolding not far away at his father's project, Islands Oasis.Critics argue that the current system is a parody of democracy. Local Government NSW has criticised the panels, stating that while councils are accountable to the community, panels are not, and there is no accountability akin to the ballot box. Additionally, the NSW Government's stranglehold over planning panels, despite dubbing them 'local,' has been viewed as deceptive, with local representatives impotent to oppose developments that the community vehemently rejects unless they align with the state government's rigid rules.The erosion of local democratic processes in planning decisions is a disconcerting trend that demands immediate attention. Restoring the authority of elected local councillors and ensuring genuine community consultation are essential steps toward a more democratic and accountable planning system. The current model, as evidenced by the Kurrajong Heights fiasco, is fundamentally broken and in dire need of reform.Editor Samantha Magnusson

The federal Labor government has pledged to establish a new Medicare Urgent Care Clinic in the Hawkesbury region, responding to strong community advocacy for enhanced healthcare facilities, particularly west of the river.While a decision on the clinic's exact location is pending, the announcement has been welcomed by Federal Member for Macquarie, Susan Templeman, who spearheaded the campaign for this medical facility in the Hawkesbury.Templeman noted that over 2,000 residents signed her petition supporting the clinic. She emphasised the difficulties locals face in accessing timely care at the Hawkesbury Hospital Emergency Department, especially after the closure of the After Hours GP Clinic under the previous government. "This new clinic will help ease pressure on the emergency department as well as local GP clinics," Ms. Templeman stated."Only Labor will deliver a Medicare Urgent Care Clinic in the Hawkesbury so you can get the free urgent care you need, fully bulk billed, without waiting hours in a busy hospital emergency department," she added.Templeman also mentioned that the Medicare Urgent Care Clinic will operate seven days a week, with extended hours, alleviating strain on the Hawkesbury District Hospital.The Albanese Labor Government has committed $644 million to open an additional 50 Medicare Urgent Care Clinics nationwide, with plans to have all new clinics operational in the next financial year. This initiative builds on their previous promise to establish 50 clinics, surpassing expectations by delivering 87 during their tenure. The new clinics, including the one in Hawkesbury, are slated to open during the 2025-26 financial year. The specific location and providers for the Hawkesbury clinic will be determined through an independent commissioning process, typically involving a competitive tender or expressions of interest to identify the most suitable provider.Medicare Urgent Care Clinics are designed to offer bulk-billed care for urgent but non-life-threatening conditions, operating seven days a week with extended hours and no appointment necessary. More than 1.2 million Australians have already been treated at existing clinics, with one-third of patients under the age of 15, highlighting their importance to families."Labor is building Australia's future with the largest investment in Medicare in over 40 years," the Prime Minister said. He also highlighted that once all clinics are operational, four in five Australians will live within a 20-minute drive of a bulk-billed Medicare Urgent Care Clinic. 

Hawkesbury Council's enthusiastic support for a contentious pub and casino development in historic Kurrajong Heights has ignited a storm of controversy, as serious flaws in the development application (DA) come to light. Residents are raising alarms over potential conflicts of interest and procedural oversights that could undermine the integrity of the approval process.The development application (DA0120/22), spearheaded by developer Bashir Merhi of Balma Projects Pty Ltd, has ignited a firestorm of opposition from local residents. While Hawkesbury Councillors do not support the project, Hawkesbury Council staff are firmly in favour of it and have recommended to the Hawkesbury Local Planning Panel that it be given the green light.Balma Projects Pty Ltd, has submitted plans for a two-story venue featuring a pub, VIP gaming lounge with up to 22 poker machines, nine accommodation cabins, and a 255-patron capacity. The proposal also includes parking for 75 cars and extended trading hours. At a heated Hawkesbury Local Planning Panel (HLPP) meeting on February 27, 2025, retired senior ecologist and Kurrajong Heights resident, Nicola Trulock, delivered a scathing critique of the project's supporting assessments. Trulock, formerly a natural resource and interim bushfire management officer for the City of Parramatta Council, lambasted the proposal for its significant omissions and inaccuracies."The Social Impact Assessment and Statement of Environmental Effects fail to mention the incompatible land use due to proximity to St David’s Church," Trulock asserted. "They also neglect to assess the social impact or increased risk of interpersonal conflict arising from such incompatible activities on local parishioners."At the heart of the dispute is the revelation that the Social Impact Assessment and Statement of Environmental Effects for the proposed development were both prepared by Balma Projects Pty Ltd, the very company seeking approval for the project.Trulock didn't mince words when highlighting a blatant conflict of interest: "The display of bias is not surprising when you learn that both reports were prepared by Balma Projects Pty Ltd, the applicant for the DA. This is a clear-cut example of conflict of interest. Why did Hawkesbury Council not insist that these reports be rectified and prepared by an independent consultant?"Further compounding the issue, Trulock discovered during the Hawkesbury Local Planning Panel (HLPP) meeting that her comprehensive 21-page report, detailing significant omissions and inaccuracies in documents supporting the DA, had not been provided to the panel members prior to their deliberations. "I am a little dismayed that Hawkesbury City Council did not provide my report to the HLPP prior to this meeting," she remarked."I specifically made an email application after I made the online application for speaking at the HLPP meeting to ensure I could send the document and receive a timestamped receipt response," she later told the Hawkesbury Post.She further accused the applicant's representatives of parroting Council's language. "Of particular concern is the use of nearly the same wording as the Council response on the agenda," Trulock observed. "The representative of the applicant stated that the site did not appear on the Biodiversity Values Map and is not located in a Koala Habitat Zone," Trulock recounted. "This was directly lifted from the Council response to my previous raising of this issue as set forth in the Agenda for the HLPP meeting."Environmental concerns took center stage as Trulock exposed the absence of an ecological impact assessment, despite the potential for the development to impact foraging and dispersal habitat for up to 23 endangered species in the area. "No ecological impact assessment was undertaken to assess impacts resulting from clearing native and non-native vegetation forming potential habitat for these threatened species," she said.. "Approval should not have been granted based on the absence of an environmental impact assessment alone."The project's bushfire risk assessment didn't escape criticism either. Trulock pointed out that the vegetation classification was erroneously labeled, leading to a dangerous underestimation of bushfire hazards. "The bushfire assessment report states that Dry Rainforest presents a low bushfire risk. They are wrong," she warned. "Dry Rainforest has a seasonal dry period during which plants shed their leaves and ferns dry out, resulting in high fuel loads just like Wet Sclerophyll Forest.“This vegetation is part of a west-east and south-north fire run, connected to large tracts of unmanaged wilderness in Blue Mountains National Park. If a fire gets into one of these runs and is pushed by strong winds, it will rapidly advance towards Kurrajong Heights, RFS will not be able to stop it as they did not require regular bushfire hazard reduction within the APZ as a condition of consent,” she said. This statement applies specifically to a fire during a prolonged drought period similar to what The Blue Mountains experienced in the 2019/2020 bushfire season and the 2013 State Mine Fire.The situation has left many residents questioning the council's role in facilitating a development that appears riddled with errors and potential conflicts of interest and how the DA has been allowed to advance to this stage.Responding to questions from the Hawkesbury Post specifically about why Trulocks submission was not provided to the HLPP, they said an earlier submission was included in the HLPP Business Paper dated February 21 but did not explain why the recent submission was not presented to the HLPP.“This response from Council refers to the submission I prepared and submitted on 2 February 2025 during the exhibition period for the DA extending from 13 January 2025 to 3 February 2025. This response does not refer to the submission report I prepared for the HLPP meeting and submitted via email to Hawkesbury City Council along with my application to speak. The minutes of the HLPP meeting will reflect the fact that when I asked the HLPP members if they had received my report, the panel members were unable to confirm that they had received the submission or reviewed it. The HLPP made a point of stating to me that they would place the issue of my HLPP submission report on notice just before the public session concluded.”