Hawkesbury City Council (HCC) has opted to remain part of the Hawkesbury River County Council (HRCC), a collaborative body formed by four councils for effective weed management across the region. This outcome comes after a Tuesday’s vote in which councillors supported a recission motion by a decisive margin of 10 to 1. Labor’s Amanda Kotlash was the only councillor who opposed the rescission motion, while former Mayor Sarah McMahon recused herself from the vote after initially supporting the proposal to withdraw from the HRCC in August.The HRCC is responsible for coordinating weed management efforts across Hawkesbury, Penrith, Hills, and Blacktown councils. Each council contributes $265,000 annually to support this initiative, which allows them to pool resources, share expertise, and access significant grant funding that no single council could secure on its own.Councillor Nathan Zamprogno expressed relief that the Liberal councillors reversed their previous stance on the matter. “It was welcome to see the Liberal Councillors reading the room for a change,” he remarked. Zamprogno criticised McMahon’s recusal, stating, “I thought it was cynical that Clr McMahon, who had no valid reason to recuse herself, removed herself from the room just so she did not have to declare what her view on the matter would be.”According to a recent state government report, weeds cost the state approximately $1.9 billion annually, underscoring the magnitude of the problem in the Hawkesbury region. The HRCC’s focus is on managing invasive weed species that not only threaten biodiversity but also pose significant risks to agricultural productivity.HRCC General Manager, Chris Dewhurst told the Hawkesbury Post it was critical to have a coordinated approach to weed management. He highlighted the dire consequences of unmanaged weed infestations, particularly for local farmers. “The weeds we focus on are toxic to cattle and horses, causing sickness or even death, leading to further economic losses,” Dewhurst noted. He pointed out that a severe weed infestation could lead to complete river shutdowns, drastically affecting agricultural irrigation.Dewhurst also pointed to the cost-effectiveness of the HRCC model. Currently, HCC pays approximately $265,000 per year for its membership, which amounts to just $1.34 per resident. In contrast, managing weeds independently would likely double this cost, making it financially imprudent. “It’s difficult to understand how anyone could propose a model where Hawkesbury could somehow get off cheaper,” he said, reflecting on the economic advantages of remaining in the partnership.The importance of collaboration among councils cannot be overstated, especially in a region like Hawkesbury, where environmental conditions such as standing water and flooding exacerbate weed proliferation. Dewhurst said, “This relationship helps maintain positive interactions among councils, ensuring that they work together rather than operate in isolation.”

Richmond Park will fall into a reverent hush as the clock strikes 11 on Monday, November 11, 2024. The Richmond RSL Sub-branch will lead a Remembrance Day service, inviting the community to honour those who have served and sacrificed for the freedoms we enjoy today. But beyond the solemn wreath-laying at the Richmond War Memorial, this day represents something more profound - a chance to connect the past with the future and remind younger generations why this tradition remains so vital.For many young people, Remembrance Day may seem like an event disconnected from their daily lives. After all, the wars it commemorates feel like ancient history. However, this day is more than just a moment of silence; it's a bridge between the past and present, a reflection on how peace, often taken for granted, has been hard-won.The tradition of observing a moment of silence at the eleventh hour on the eleventh day of the eleventh month began after World War I, the so-called "War To End All Wars." It's a time when entire nations pause to reflect on the immense loss of life, not just from that conflict, but from all wars. More than 60,000 Australians died during World War I, and the ripple effect of that loss continues to shape families and communities.But how does this history resonate with younger generations? Today's young people may not feel the immediate impact of global conflicts, but they live in a world shaped by them. The soldiers, airmen, and sailors whose service we remember on this day fought for ideals that still resonate—freedom, fairness, and unity. In many ways, these values are even more relevant in today's rapidly changing world.The Richmond RSL Sub-branch invites all members of the community, young and old, to the 2024 Remembrance Day service. As they gather at Richmond War Memorial, local school students will stand alongside veterans and military personnel, laying wreaths to commemorate those who came before them. It's a powerful visual reminder that, even though past wars may seem far removed, the legacy of service and sacrifice lives on.Involving schools and younger community members is part of a broader effort to ensure the importance of Remembrance Day continues to resonate. The Richmond RSL Sub-Branch hopes that by bringing together people of all ages, younger generations will see the relevance of reflecting on peace and the price paid for it."Remembrance Day is an opportunity for young people to connect with history in a meaningful way," a spokesperson for the Sub-branch said. "It's not just about looking back, but about understanding how the past shapes our present and future. The peace we have today was earned through great sacrifice."So, as Remembrance Day approaches, it's worth pausing to consider why we observe this tradition. It's not just for the older generations who remember the wars firsthand but for young people whose future is being built on the foundation of those sacrifices. This November 11, Richmond will once again honour that legacy—and invite a new generation to carry it forward. Details of the Remembrance Day Service:- Location: Richmond War Memorial, Richmond Park- Time: 10:55am, Monday, November 11, 2024 (assemble by 10:40am)- Covered seating available for veterans and older community members.

In a push to empower the next generation, Windsor Park Public School students are learning life-saving disaster preparedness skills through a hands-on program with the Australian Red Cross and Australia Post. Through the Pillowcase Project workshop, kids are discovering what it takes to be ready for extreme weather events, especially relevant as summer approaches.This isn’t your typical classroom lesson. Students learn exactly what to pack in an emergency, how to keep calm under pressure, and what to expect before, during, and after a disaster. By the end of the workshop, each child will go home with a pillowcase – not for sleepovers but for packing critical emergency items that could make all the difference if disaster strikes.“Working in every community across Australia, our team members are often at the frontline of disaster,” said Nicky Tracey, General Manager of Community and Stakeholder Engagement at Australia Post. “We see firsthand how a disaster can affect a community, and we want to do what we can to provide support.”Tracey pointed out that with hotter, drier summers forecast, these workshops become crucial in helping communities prepare. “The workshops and resources will give children in high-risk areas the practical skills in the event of extreme weather like bushfires. Pillowcase workshops help more than 6,000 young Australians in high-risk areas every year to prepare for a major disaster before they are in the thick of one.”The initiative taps into the power of young people to drive change within their own families. Antonia Mackay, Resilience Manager at Australian Red Cross, says children are often surprisingly strong contributors to disaster resilience. “Children are positive change agents within their families and their communities. If given the opportunity to participate, they can make a very real and positive difference before, during, and after an emergency,” she said.As part of the larger EmergencyRedi campaign, Australia Post is also delivering over 3 million “Prepare” flyers across disaster-prone areas, from Lismore to Bundaberg, packed with tips to help families get ready for an emergency. To support communities impacted by disasters, locals can donate to the Australian Red Cross at Post Offices or on the Australia Post website.In a changing climate, teaching children these skills could one day make all the difference.

Windsor RSL Club has reported record profits for the 2024 financial year, largely driven by local residents’ losses on its 178 poker machines. Despite this financial success, the club continues to contribute only a small fraction of its tax-free earnings back to the community - particularly to the ex-servicemen and women it was originally established to support.The club’s total revenue for the year exceeded $22 million, with $13.6 million generated from poker machine operations. However, donations to community and veteran organisations remained disproportionately low. In 2024, Windsor RSL allocated just 1.2 percent of its total revenue, approximately $266,707, to local groups - nearly 20 percent less than the previous year, despite a significant rise in profits. In 2023, the club donated $331,900.RSL Clubs have come under increasing fire over the past few years with critics arguing that funds lost by patrons at poker machines continue to serve the club's commercial interests rather than the community. In September the national head of the RSL of Australia supported a push to stop licenced clubs from using the RSL letters in their names amid a fight over whether poker machines should be allowed in the venues at all.For the first time, Windsor RSL’s annual report featured a prominent infographic on the front page, presenting a polished image of the club's contributions to the community. The page was filled with gimmicky statistics, including the number of “schnittys” sold, burgers, beers, and cups of coffee served, alongside raffle tickets and bingo games. What was glaringly absent was any mention of the club’s 178 poker machines - the real financial engine driving its revenues. This omission creates a misleading impression that the club’s focus is on hospitality, and community service rather than its real financial driver - gaming losses. These losses by patrons helped drive the club’s fortunes with a 38% increase in Earnings Before Interest, Tax, Depreciation, and Amortisation (EBITDA), which rose to $4.2 million. Net profit climbed from $1 million last year to $1.5 million in 2024. Yet, Windsor RSL President David Ingram provided no substantial commentary on any part of the club's operations nor the club’s obligations to veterans or the community in the annual report. Instead, Ingram briefly stated that the club aims to "operate in a responsible and financially prudent manner," adding that Windsor RSL "plays an important role in honouring present and returned servicemen and servicewomen."RSL Clubs were originally established to champion the welfare of Australian Defence Force members, both serving and retired. However, the financial reality paints a different picture. Most funds raised from poker machine losses appear to fuel the club’s commercial expansion, rather than support the veterans and their families as the organisation’s constitution mandates.Windsor RSL’s retained profits now exceed $14 million - an extraordinary amount for a not-for-profit organisation, which pays no tax. This financial cushion enabled the club to acquire the nearby Windsor Country Golf Club and add 12 more poker machines to its roster. The club’s continued investment in gaming operations has sparked growing concerns about problem gambling in the Hawkesbury region. With over 800 electronic gaming machines in the area, advocates say these venues contribute to financial distress, mental health issues, and family violence.Meanwhile, the community in Kurrajong Heights is once again rallying against a proposed development for a casino and pub in the historic precinct. Despite widespread opposition to the initial proposal, the developer has submitted a revised application, seeking to open a gaming venue operating seven days a week, with VIP access for gamblers and a capacity of over 300 patrons.

Police are currently searching a property in Upper Colo for the body of 82-year-old miniature horse breeder Edwin Dobbin, who has been missing since September and is believed to have been shot in the head. The search is part of an ongoing investigation into Dobbin's disappearance and suspected murder.Camden Police charged Phillip Robert Bruce, 67, of Smithfield, with murder following his arrest yesterday in connection with Dobbin’s disappearance. Dobbin, who was from Leppington, was reported missing in September, prompting an extensive police investigation.Police allege that Bruce, known to the missing man, provided conflicting information during the investigation. After extensive inquiries involving the State Crime Command’s Homicide Squad, Bruce was arrested at his home in Smithfield around 2:45 pm on Thursday, October 24, 2024. He was taken to Fairfield Police Station and did not apply for bail during his appearance at Fairfield Local Court today.The matter has been adjourned until December 19 at Parramatta Local Court.Following the arrest, officers from the Hawkesbury Police Area Command executed a crime scene warrant at a property in Upper Colo, where they believe Dobbin’s body may be buried. The search of the property is ongoing today, Friday, October 25.Bruce faces multiple charges, including murder, hindering the investigation of a serious indictable offence, and unlawful disposal of a corpse. Police allege that Bruce and Dobbin were known to each other. The investigation remains ongoing.

In September, a pair of Tawny Frogmouths perched on an old gum tree in Kurrajong, guarding their soon-to-hatch eggs. Three weeks later, their home was gone. The tree, along with dozens of others, was felled to widen a private road for a housing development at 150 Hermitage Road, Kurrajong.Eric Finley, a long-time resident, was devastated when he returned home to find the landscape transformed. "All of the wildlife corridor is destroyed," he told the Hawkesbury Post, referring to the removal of 30 to 40 mature trees late last month, including Eucalyptus punctata, a critical food source for koalas. Finley's family have lived adjacent to the property since 1999, documenting over 130 koala sightings there since 2009.The destruction of these trees, half of which were over 50 years old, has wreaked havoc on a crucial wildlife corridor. The once densely treed route allowed species to move between Blue Gum Creek and bushland along Mill Road. Now, it's gone, with native animals like koalas, sugar gliders, and even the endangered masked owl left without cover or food sources."There was a beautiful old Grey Gum overhanging Douglas Farm Road, where frogmouths and Wonga pigeons had nested for years," Finley explained. "Their chicks would have been helpless when the tree was felled. We can only hope the parents survived."While Hawkesbury City Council (HCC) eventually issued a temporary halt on further tree removal, it was too late to prevent the loss of over 40 trees, including towering ironbarks and grey gums - trees essential to the local ecosystem and the region's koalas. Despite community outcry, the development, approved over a decade ago, continues under outdated standards. HCC said it is powerless to halt projects approved long before current environmental laws came into effect.But the loss of trees in the area doesn't end there. Just a few kilometres away, in Grose Vale, even more, trees are slated for removal this month - this time as part of the controversial Redbank development. Nearly a kilometre of mature native trees along Grose Vale Road, including old gums and ironbarks, are tagged to be cut down to make way for road widening as part of a Voluntary Planning Agreement (VPA) between Redbank developers and Hawkesbury City Council. Council defended the removal: "The Regional Panel, in its deliberations, concluded that the proposal would not have a significant impact on any threatened species, populations, or communities listed under the Biodiversity Conservation Act. The loss of trees at this site would be addressed holistically in the proposed tree planting schedule, which includes 1,049 replacement trees across the Southern Valley Precinct."This planned tree removal, slated for this month, has sparked outrage from local residents, also because the trees being cleared are not located on Redbank's side of the development. Instead, they sit on the opposite side of the road, just metres from established homes not associated with the Redbank project.The residents' depth of feeling was evident in the hundreds of social media comments expressing concerns about tree removal.Julie Power captured the sentiment of many, writing, "Disgusting they will move the new road to where the trees are destroyed. Redbank is killing the Hawkesbury area. When the birds vanish, remember the developers always win."Abigail Ball expressed her disbelief, challenging the logic behind the decision: "What an absolute disgrace! Anyone who thinks planting new trees as a replacement for mature trees is any kind of compensation needs to take a long hard look at themselves. Maybe people just need to learn to drive with trees adjacent to the road?"Judy Hitchcock added, "When will this horror stop? I just can't fathom our governments, be they local or state. On the one hand, they bang on incessantly about the need to protect our canopy trees and our native wildlife, and with the other, they sign the death warrants of our animals through development."Doug Wiggins shared concerns about wildlife in the broader region: "In nearby Glossodia, clearing has all but eliminated satin bower birds, Spotted Pardalotes, blue wrens, fantails, silver eyes, other finches, wattle birds, and Regent/blue-faced honeyeaters."Maree Holton summed up the general sentiment: "It's just devastating what is happening to our environment, it's getting worse! Our wildlife is continually suffering, and unfortunately, I can't see anything changing because governments and councils don't care."As more trees are marked for removal, concerns are growing over the broader impact on the region's biodiversity. The now-exposed earth at Hermitage Road already threatens to pollute Blue Gum Creek with sediment, where platypus were confirmed in a University of Western Sydney study last year. Koalas had also been seen in many of the cleared trees, and one was heard bellowing just metres away over several days last weekend.Despite promises by all levels of government to protect wildlife habitat and native bushland, the story on the ground tells a different tale. Bit by bit, communities like the Hawkesbury are losing irreplaceable natural resources as developments proceed unchecked. Planning laws, riddled with loopholes, provide developers with legal means to clear land for profit. Environmental regulations are often so weak or malleable that even zoning laws designed to protect wildlife are easily bypassed.The NSW Biodiversity Conservation Act 2016, intended to safeguard habitats, is often criticised for failing to provide meaningful protection. While the Act requires biodiversity assessments for developments, these assessments are funded by developers, raising concerns about bias. In many cases, habitat value can be downgraded, allowing projects to proceed in areas once deemed ecologically significant.In the case of Grose Vale and Kurrajong, the result is clear: vital wildlife corridors, essential for the survival of species like koalas, platypus, and endangered birds, are being systematically wiped out, all under the guise of legal development. As a result, the natural landscape of the Hawkesbury is being reshaped - permanently.One resident summed up the situation: "Every tree that's cut down is a step closer to losing what makes this place special. We're being told there's nothing that can be done, but it doesn't feel right. How can something like this keep happening?"

Dear Editor,Re: Hawkesbury Post article "Monday's candidate for review is Amanda Kotlash from the Labor Party", (Online) 9 September 2024As previously notified, we received a complaint concerning the above article.The complainant said (in relevant part) that the article’s “… tone was disparaging and it was in many points inaccurate, unfair, incomplete and opinionated. It was not based on fact.”After careful consideration, the Council’s Secretariat has decided not to proceed further with the complaint. In reaching this decision, we have taken into account that the information in the article appears to be based on publicly available information from Hawksbury City Council. As such, we consider the publication has taken reasonable steps to comply with the Press Council’s principles in relation to accuracy and fairness. Accordingly, we consider it is unlikely that a breach of the Council’s Standards of Practice has occurred.The complainant has been informed of the outcome and the complaint is now closed.Kind regards, Paul NangleDirector of ComplaintsAustralian Press Council IncLevel 3/77 Pacific HighwayNorth Sydney NSW 2060Telephones: 02 9261 1930  1 800 025 712www.presscouncil.org.au

In a seismic shift, the Australian government is set to impose strict new limits on toxic "forever chemicals" in drinking water - substances linked to cancer and a range of other severe health problems. The long-overdue move marks a major policy turnaround, acknowledging the grave risks posed by PFAS chemicals that have seeped into water supplies nationwide. For years, experts have warned about the dangers, and now, under pressure, Australia will drastically lower the allowable levels of these harmful substances, potentially forcing a massive clean-up effort across the country.The proposed changes, revealed by the SMH will be announced today and will bring Australia's standards closer to the toughest global regulations, following in the footsteps of the United States. However, some critics argue the new limits don’t go far enough, with certain chemicals still permitted at levels far higher than those in the U.S., despite their known links to cancer, immune system damage, and other health impacts. This is a watershed moment for Australia's environmental and health policy, but the question remains: has this change come too late for communities already heavily exposed - including Richmond in the Hawkesbury? The dangerous cancer-causing chemicals have been detected in the North Richmond water supply at dangerous levels.PFAS contamination has silently spread through water systems for years, with some locations already breaching the proposed limits. The extent of the damage is still largely unknown, and many areas have never been tested. With the nation now facing the financial and logistical burden of cleaning up contaminated water supplies, the spotlight will likely shift to whether corporate giants - 3M and DuPont - responsible for the pollution will be held accountable.More to come....

While we’re still waiting to catch up with our new Mayor, Les Sheather, for an interview, we thought you’d enjoy revisiting this feature story The Hawkesbury Post published on him a few years back. It's a great read and offers insight into the man now leading our community!Group focus – Les and The Doc – less red tape, raise Warragamba Dam wall, a less ‘woke’ HawkesburyNov 30, 2021 Les Sheather is no stranger to Hawkesbury Council, he served on it for almost two decades, and he says the animosity he has seen among its members this last term needs to end. Mr Sheather is heading a team of six independents and like the Liberals in this election each of his candidates has a moniker. With the Liberals it’s titles like The Leader, The Farmer, The…you get the picture – with Mr Sheather’s group there’s The Doc, Coldy, Hodg, Morgs and Shell. So, let’s take a look at this first, because there has been talk in the community about Les and The Doc being a front for the Liberals, a way to get more like-minded people on the Council. It’s not overly fanciful – as the Sydney Morning Herald reported four days ago there are Liberals standing as independents in a number of other local council elections – there is a pattern. Mr Sheather’s number 2 – Dr Warwick Mackay, himself also an ex-Hawkesbury councillor – is a member of the Liberal Party. Mr Sheather previously stood for One Nation at a past Federal election, though he’s not currently a member of any other political party, apart from his own, and he says he resigned from the Liberal Party in the 1980s. Les and The Doc are preferencing the Liberals. Like the Hawkesbury Liberals, who have run what one Liberal insider told us was seen as a “presidential campaign”, in other words the two main candidates Conolly and Richards fronting the posters and most appearances, so too have Les and The Doc mostly fronted theirs. Even the icons used on Les and The Doc’s Facebook posts follow a similar pattern to the Liberals – and the colours are the same too. It’s all the more surprising because back 8 months ago Mr Sheather told the Post he didn’t have a Facebook page and didn’t even know how the social media site worked. The Les and The Doc team: L-R: Morgan ‘Morgs’ Mackay, Dave ‘Coldy’ Coldrake, Dr Warwick Mackay, Gerard ‘Hodg’ Hodgskin, Les Sheather, Michelle ‘Shell’ Sheather And on Facebook, Dr Mackay said, “We are not constantly attached to our keyboards and our iPhones like others seem to be. We don’t care about that rubbish,” but their Facebook posts have been extremely well written, presented and put together – in fact they have been among the best this campaign has seen. Where’s that come from? When Mr Sheather wanted to set up what turned out to be a short-lived Facebook page eight months ago pushing the raising of Warragamba Dam wall – yes he’s in favour of that – he turned to family friend, property mogul and leading local Liberal, Matthew Bennett, to build it for him. So who has been doing all the social media work, taking the pictures and writing the words, given these two blokes Les and The Doc say they don’t have a natural affinity for social media? “We’ve got other people who help with those things,” Mr Sheather told the Post when we put the questions a lot of people are asking. “The pictures are taken with a telephone, it’s no big deal, we’ve got Coldy [Dave ‘Coldy’ Coaldrake – one of the groups’ candidates] who does this stuff regularly. Gerard [Gerard Hodgskin – another candidate] who gives us a hand but he’s a bit like me. Between us we’ve worked it out. “We’ve sought advice from different people but they have only been friends who are supportive of what we do,” says Mr Sheather. “As to being tied into the Liberals, Warwick has been a member of the Libs, he may still be, I was years ago, I’ve always been to the right, I’ve been for One Nation once, I’m not hiding that. But in saying that, I don’t care what’s being said, people know where I stand. “In council my political views will not have a bearing on decisions I make.” “That’s why I resigned from the Liberal Party in 1983 because we were being dictated to by people from outside of our city on how, and what’s in the best interests of our community, and our community know that, I work for people who elect me.” Okay, we’ve got that out of the way – now let’s look at what Mr Sheather wants to achieve. We should say straight out, he is a bloke who clearly has the community at heart and he’s involved in many community groups. When others might be retiring, he’s still out there and engaged with the locals. You will not find anyone who speaks ill of Les Sheather – even political foes tell you he is a true gentleman who politely but firmly speaks his mind. What you see if what you get. “I wanted to stand the election before but the wife was a bit reluctant for me to do that,” he says. “We have put nearly half our life into council in the past and it’s a big ask. But she changed her mind when he saw how passionate I was about it.”  Les Sheather and Dr Warwick Mackay, hands on hips in South Windsor He says council processes need to be streamlined and he cites too much red tape as a major issue. He also can’t see why it took 18 months to get a report on sullage and pump-out from Council staff and says that is indicative of unacceptable delays. In one early Facebook campaign post, Les and The Doc said for four of the last five years, “Council has been governed by incompetence”, which suggests the last year it wasn’t, yet the last year has been one of the most divisive we’ve ever seen. “They raised our rates by 30% but our roads still need repair, sporting fields are at capacity and our community facilities are worn out. You can’t even get a shed approved by the planning department without major hassles and lots of expensive reports,” said Les and The Doc. “During this time, the Council had its biggest staff ever, it spent millions on consultants and focussed on ‘woke’ issues. “The councillors have spent hours debating unnecessary motions that are not part of the Council’s responsibilities, rather than fixing the potholes and playgrounds. It is a Council, not the ABC. “During those four years, they turned the Council WOKE and that means it is now going BROKE!” Fighting words indeed, and catchy too, but what does Mr Sheather believe he and his candidates can really bring to the Council? Men at work: Sheather and Mackay on the road… “How can they [Council] take up to 18 months to give approval for a house? There are thousands of homes built every day, there’s got to be an easier process to deal with those things,” says Mr Sheather. “It’s not just housing, any development at all. People want to get on with their lives and they are being frustrated through red tape. If the councillors aren’t making an issue about it then I don’t expect the staff are going to change it,” he says. And what would a Les Sheather-led group of councillors look like? “If I get elected, I’m not naive to think I’m going to make this massive difference by myself. If I get elected I’ll be one of 12 there, and if Warwick is there we might be 2 of 12. “Warwick and I, while we have got a lot in common, there may even be times when we will vote separately. That’s what independence is about and that’s one of the things that we want to bring back to local government. “The people will choose who, and it’s up to those 12 people who work there to get common objectives and make it a better place. “We’re very passionate about the Hawkesbury and the people who live in it.” One thing he is very passionate about is looking at the committee structure which was radically changed after Labor and Liberals voted together to push it through. He doesn’t believe it was the right thing to do. “That [getting rid of the original committee structure] was dumb, it’s crazy. You can’t understand what the community feels, or look at their values or way of life, if you are not communicating with them. “And if you isolate it to just a small group of people then you get repetitious views which may not be the view of the general community. From Bilpin to St Albans and everything in between, values or opportunities do vary and it is up to the council to massage those and have a good community. “They [councillors] do all want to make it a better place, but you can’t lead a football team if you don’t have everyone playing together. Council is no different. “That would be my main objective, to bring cohesion, because unless that happens the other stuff falls away.” Mr Sheather says he sat through a few council meetings in this current term and he didn’t like what he saw. “I sat there a couple of times and I was embarrassed. As a prior councillor I have pride in the people who have been before us. And the custodians, the elected councillors today, have got a responsibility.” He says he has spoken to both sides in the Council and reckons they need to take stock. “They both see evil but do no evil. I’m saying have a look in the mirror. You can’t chuck a rock and say it fell out of the sky. The people deserve better. I know all of them in there and I know their direction of view is not hostile and they are community minded, but for some damned reason they will not work together. “And they blame the politics. Politics is out there somewhere but you’ve got a personal attitude to how you deal with things and that is your responsibility. I would seek strongly to encourage the better side.”

Buried deep inside the Hawkesbury Council’s 129-page Draft 2025 Flood Plan is a proposal that could change the future of Windsor and the surrounding Macquarie towns in ways that few residents likely see coming. The recommendation, to raise the flood control level to the 1 in 200 AEP (Annual Exceedance Probability) event, plus a 0.5-meter freeboard, would push the flood planning level in Windsor to 19.3 meters - nearly two meters higher than the current benchmark.At first glance, this technical-sounding adjustment might seem like a minor policy shift. But for tens of thousands of property owners across the region, the implications are nothing short of seismic. The flood planning level serves as the official marker that determines whether land is considered flood-prone, and it plays a crucial role in decisions about everything from home insurance to financing, resale value, and the permissibility of development. In simple terms, this recommendation could reclassify large portions of Windsor and other towns as too risky to build on, sending shockwaves through the property market.For Windsor alone, this higher flood planning level would bring drastic changes. Thousands of homes and businesses, which currently sit just above the existing flood level, would now fall below the new mark, triggering a domino effect of economic and personal consequences.Property values in these areas could plummet as buyers shy away from flood-prone land. Insurance companies, already hesitant to cover properties below the 1 in 100 AEP level, could withdraw further, leaving many homeowners without the safety net of flood insurance. Financing, too, would become a major hurdle. Banks have already been limiting loans for properties at risk of flooding, and an increase to the 1 in 200 level would make securing a mortgage even more difficult.The implications don’t stop there. Under the new flood control level, property owners may face severe restrictions on what they can do with their land. Any sort of development - whether it’s building new homes, making improvements, or even repairing damage - would be subject to tighter controls. Floor levels for new buildings would need to be elevated to meet the new flood standards, and the process of getting approval for even minor changes could become bogged down in red tape. For many, this could mean the end of future development plans and a sharp reduction in the value of their investments.The impact wouldn’t be limited to Windsor. The new flood planning level would affect a wide area, including most of the other Macquarie towns. While these places have long dealt with flood risks, the proposed changes would cast a much wider net, pulling in properties that were previously considered relatively safe from flooding. Ironically, the new measures would have little impact on the Hawkesbury Lowlands, where the 2020 flood policy changes already precluded almost all development. However, it is likely to impact resale value as buyers find it harder to obtain finance. But, for areas like Windsor and Richmond, the proposal represents a seismic economic and planning change.What makes this situation even more troubling is how the proposed changes have been communicated - or rather, not communicated. Hidden in the depths of a lengthy technical document, these recommendations haven’t received the clear, public-facing explanation that such a significant change deserves. For a policy that could affect tens of thousands of people, critics argue that the council should have done much more to bring these issues into the spotlight. Instead, many residents who stand to lose the most may not even be aware that their property is on the verge of being reclassified.The Draft 2025 Flood Plan has been placed on public exhibition, inviting comments from the community. However, the lack of widespread awareness about the proposal means that many people may not realise the scale and implications of the changes being proposed. The last day for the receipt of submissions is Monday 9 December 2024.Council’s flood management strategy is built on the idea of safeguarding the community from future flood events, and the proposal to raise the flood planning level is presented as a necessary step in preparing for increasingly severe floods, compounded by climate change. The draft plan even mentions that the current flood planning levels don’t fully account for potential flood risks, particularly as the region faces growing uncertainties in predicting flood behavior. The inclusion of a 0.5-meter freeboard - a safety buffer added to the 1 in 200 AEP level - is designed to account for these uncertainties, including factors like storm surges, wind influences, and potential errors in flood modeling.“Typically, in coastal locations a 0.5m freeboard above the 1% AEP is similar to the 0.5% AEP level. At Windsor the freeboard would need to be 1.2m to provide an Flood Planning Level at the 0.5% AEP level. With climate change 2030 1% AEP flood levels are already close to the historic 0.5% AEP. Given the extreme flood range, consideration should be given to using a flood planning level greater than the 1% AEP. The extreme flood range or the climate change risk (as discussed in Section 7.3) are enough in isolation to recommend consideration of a higher flood planning level than the 1% AEP,” the study conducted by engineering consultants, WMA Water said."Hawkesbury City Council’s current planning documents set the Flood Planning Level to the 1% AEP level without freeboard. The nature of the Hawkesbury-Nepean Valley means that the additional area affected by an increase in flood planning level is small. Based on the flood range and climate risk it is recommended that Council adopt the 0.5 % AEP (1 in 200 AEP) as the defined flood event and the 0.5 % AEP (1 in 200 AEP) plus 0.5m freeboard for the Flood Planning Level….Therefore, it is recommended that Councils planning documents be updated to reflect this. Consideration should be given to the inclusion of climate change in planning levels," it said.You can see how the new proposed flood planning levels would impact your home here - New Draft Flood Plan HCC

Australia's National Aerial Firefighting Fleet has added new equipment to its arsenal, ready to tackle the upcoming high-risk weather season. A C-130 Hercules Large Air Tanker and three heavy-lift helicopters - a Sikorsky S61N and two Blackhawks - are now on standby, poised to assist communities facing fires, floods, and other natural disasters.The new aircraft, part of a $48 million investment into the National Aerial Firefighting Fleet, bring a crucial capability to Australia’s disaster response toolkit. Equipped for more than just fire suppression, these aircraft can support diverse emergency operations, including delivering heavy water drops, conducting search and rescue missions, and assisting with evacuations. The C-130 Hercules is the primary addition, capable of releasing 13,250 litres of fire retardant, making it effective for large-scale fire containment. It’s accompanied by a Cessna Citation 525, which acts as a lead plane, guiding the tanker for precise drops in critical areas. The Sikorsky S61 helicopter, by comparison, can carry 4,000 litres of water and is intended for flexibility in various emergency scenarios.Coordination of these assets will be managed by the National Aerial Firefighting Centre (NAFC), which will position the aircraft across the country based on operational needs. During the high-risk weather season, the NAFC will work with state and territory agencies to determine where the fleet is needed most, and potentially relocate aircraft as conditions change.Minister for Emergency Management Jenny McAllister said the multi-purpose design of the aircraft meant to respond to an array of disaster situations, not just bushfires. “These aircraft help save lives and safeguard our communities and environment during disasters,” McAllister said. “This year, helicopters will supplement the existing fleet and provide the much-needed ability to operate in disasters requiring aerial support, beyond bushfires.”With over 160 specialised aircraft, Australia’s National Aerial Firefighting Fleet is substantially larger than it was before the devastating 2019 - 2020 Black Summer bushfires, when it included around 135 aircraft. The fleet's expanded capabilities are to help address the increasing severity and frequency of natural disasters.

Photos taken near 150 Hermitage Rd in Kurrajong paint a jarring picture: upstream of a new development, the Blue Gum Creek flows clear and unblemished, but downstream, it turns into a murky brownish-yellow, laden with sediment.These images were captured yesterday, 15 October. Some residents have since written to Hawkesbury Council, raising serious concerns about environmental damage linked to the developer’s lack of sediment control. Eric Finley, whose family has lived alongside the creek for 25 years, said he has “never seen water of this color here before, even after heavy rain.” He believes there has been a lack of proper oversight and control which is required under the conditions of the Development Application (DA). Finley’s letter to Council detailed the impact of sediment runoff on Blue Gum Creek, which is home to a range of wildlife, including Platypus that rely on the creek’s health for survival. Sediment pollution occurs when soil particles run off into waterways, impacting both human and animal health.“The difference in water quality above and below the site is dramatic even at a casual glance,” Finley wrote, pointing out that the upstream water remains clear while the downstream section, where major earth and roadworks are underway, is heavily discoloured. Finley’s letter references sediment control advice given by a Council officer to the developer last month, which was intended to prevent precisely this outcome.Finley also noted that a University of Western Sydney study found platypus DNA in Blue Gum Creek in June 2023, confirming the presence of this species. The creek flows into Little Wheeny Creek, a significant ecosystem for the region, supporting a variety of threatened and endangered species. The recent pollution threatens the delicate balance of this habitat, with sedimentation potentially damaging the food sources and nesting areas crucial to wildlife.In his letter, Finley demanded that the Council take immediate action to enforce stricter controls at the site. “This development has already had a significant and unnecessary impact on the local environment and wildlife, not to mention local residents' quality of life,” he wrote, urging the Council to address the issue before it worsens.Finley’s concerns reflect broader frustrations among residents who have witnessed local ecosystems disrupted by so-called “Zombie DAs”- developments approved under planning applications granted more than a decade ago. The DA for 150 Hermitage Rd, approved in 2008, allowed the developer to clear land and wildlife habitat under regulations that some residents believe are outdated and inadequate for protecting the environment today.Despite assurances from the Council last month that the developer would install necessary sediment controls, photos and first-hand observations suggest otherwise. Council had not responded to the Hawkesbury Post’s questions by the time of publication.The photo on the left shows Blue Gum Creek about 400 metres upstream from the development. The photo on the right is Blue Gum Creek approximately 200 metres downstream from the development.

A shock mayoral election result leaves the local Liberal Party with the whip hand for another two years.In a move that defies the results of the recent local election, Les Sheather has been elected Mayor of Hawkesbury, with Sarah McMahon selected as Deputy Mayor, maintaining a Liberal-aligned leadership team for the Council. Last night, 12 newly elected councillors were sworn in before casting their votes for a new mayor and deputy mayor to lead the council in the upcoming term. This followed last month’s local government elections, which saw significant voter backlash against major parties. The Liberal Party experienced one of the largest electoral swings in Hawkesbury's history, while the Labor Party lost a seat in the Chamber.The September election saw a remarkable shift away from large party-affiliated candidates, with Mary Lyons-Buckett, a leading independent councillor, receiving a strong mandate. Her “People Not Parties” group gained an extra seat, highlighting voter dissatisfaction with the status quo and delivering a clear message for change. The Liberal Party, led by former Mayor, McMahon lost more than 25% of its formal vote and barely held onto its fourth seat, reflecting a significant erosion of public trust. McMahon’s individual vote fell by over 36% compared to the last election.Despite a clear mandate for change, last night's Mayoral vote saw Liberal-aligned Independent, Sheather win against Lyons-Buckett, Labor’s Amanda Kotlash, and Independent, Nathan Zamprogno. Lyons-Buckett was backed by Greens Councillor Danielle Wheeler, Independent Tom Aczel, Zamprogno, and Kotlash in the final vote. Meanwhile, Zamprogno received two votes in the first and second rounds, supported by Shane Djuric of the Shooters, Fishers, and Farmers Party. Kotlash secured only her own vote and dropped out after the first round.Sheather, however, maintained solid support from all Liberal-aligned councillors throughout the rounds, and in the final vote, gained additional backing from Djuric and Kotlash. This solidified a right-leaning bloc on the Council and indicated that the controversial Liberal/Labor alliance will likely persist this term. With this alignment, Sheather secured a seven-vote majority, clinching the mayoral seat.At last months Council elections, Sheather’s Group garnered just 3.38% of the formal vote, representing about one-third of the support received by the Groups led by the other mayoral candidates. Personally, he secured a mere 0.55% of the vote, with his popularity slightly exceeding that of Kotlash, who received just 0.39%, amounting to only 139 votes from the community.The Deputy Mayoral election last night played out similarly. McMahon won the position after a drawn-out voting process that pitted Lyons-Buckett and her supporters against McMahon and her allies. In the first round, McMahon received six votes, with Lyons-Buckett trailing with four, while Zamprogno received two votes, supported by his own and those from Djuric. The tie was ultimately broken by lot, securing McMahon’s position as Deputy Mayor. The new leadership faces significant challenges in addressing critical issues that have fueled dissatisfaction among the Hawkesbury community. Key concerns during the election included inappropriate and rapid development, the protection of natural environments - particularly native animal habitats - and the integrity of councillors. Voters overwhelmingly supported candidates who prioritised greater transparency and sustainable growth, stressing the need for a Council that not only listens to its residents but also takes decisive action on their behalf.Sheather and McMahon will serve in their new roles until September 2026.

The vote is on, and by tonight, we’ll know who’s taking the mayoral seat. Independent Councillor Nathan Zamprogno is the only one to confirm he’s in the race. Meanwhile, the Hawkesbury Liberals, including former Mayor, Sarah McMahon, have stayed silent on their intentions.It’s unknown whether Mary Lyons-Buckett, who brought home a very strong election result will also run. Rumors are swirling about backroom deals and mounting pressure on a number of Councillors to secure their vote, especially Councillor Les Sheather. Some speculate he could make a run for mayor himself, potentially with a Liberal deputy in tow. Could the Liberals back that move? It seems unlikely, but stranger things have happened in politics.If the contest narrows to McMahon vs. Zamprogno, Sheather may well hold the Council’s fate in his hands. With the vote expected to be razor-close, every single count will matter.We’ll first hear from the General Manager, who will announce the nominations once the meeting opens at 6:30 PM. By 7:30 PM, Hawkesbury will have its new Mayor. Stay tuned for the outcome!

A NSW Government inquiry into “Zombie DAs” could bring about reforms to protect crucial koala and wildlife habitats across the Hawkesbury. Federal Member for Macquarie, Susan Templeman, is urging residents to make their voices heard, as public input could be key in safeguarding local ecosystems.Zombie DAs, or dormant development applications, refer to projects approved years - or even decades - ago that bypass current environmental standards. Often inactive for extended periods, these developments can suddenly restart with little regard for updated regulations or the latest ecological knowledge.In the Hawkesbury, several projects, including a controversial housing development at 150 Hermitage Road in Kurrajong, threaten significant wildlife habitats. Templeman pointed out that the community is increasingly aware of the dangers these outdated consents pose.“There’s a growing understanding in our community that there are significant threats to the habit of koalas and vulnerable native animals in the Hawkesbury, particularly through ‘zombie DAs’,” Templeman said.“These historic DAs were done with a different set of rules or understanding of the importance of the land, or approved for any number of reasons. In the Hawkesbury we’ve seen the impact of these zombie DAs firsthand. I’ve heard from many people who are understandably distressed that we’re seeing trees cleared, trees we now know, are home to koalas. “While the revival of dormant, historic DAs is not the only reason habitat is being cleared, there will be other old DAs that come back to life in the future. That’s why I’m encouraging Hawkesbury residents to contact the inquiry and share their concerns about how they’re hurting our vulnerable native wildlife,” she said.The Kurrajong project, approved by Hawkesbury City Council in 2010, could harm local wildlife corridors critical to koalas, glossy black cockatoos, and other endangered species. Despite strong public backlash, the project moves forward under 2010 regulations, which allows the property to be subdivided into eight residential lots.Hawkesbury Council has told residents they are powerless to stop it, but have sought further advice from the NSW Minister for the Environment to see if updated conservation laws could apply. Council has not provided any update on whether they received any advice.Templeman encouraged residents to contact the inquiry to share their concerns about the impact of Zombie DAs. Although formal submissions are closed, she assured that the Committee on Environment and Planning will still consider correspondence from concerned residents. Greens MP Cate Faehrmann has also highlighted the urgent need to reevaluate Zombie DAs across NSW, highlighting the threat these outdated approvals pose to species already on the brink of extinction. “These old consents would never meet today’s environmental standards,” Faehrmann stated. “We can’t allow approvals from decades ago to continue harming wildlife.”Residents can learn more about the inquiry and how to share their views by visiting the NSW Parliament website.https://www.parliament.nsw.gov.au/committees/inquiries/Pages/inquiry-details.aspx?pk=3037#tab-contactus

Richmond Park will fall into a reverent hush as the clock strikes 11 on Monday, November 11, 2024. The Richmond RSL Sub-branch will lead a Remembrance Day service, inviting the community to honour those who have served and sacrificed for the freedoms we enjoy today. But beyond the solemn wreath-laying at the Richmond War Memorial, this day represents something more profound - a chance to connect the past with the future and remind younger generations why this tradition remains so vital.For many young people, Remembrance Day may seem like an event disconnected from their daily lives. After all, the wars it commemorates feel like ancient history. However, this day is more than just a moment of silence; it's a bridge between the past and present, a reflection on how peace, often taken for granted, has been hard-won.The tradition of observing a moment of silence at the eleventh hour on the eleventh day of the eleventh month began after World War I, the so-called "War To End All Wars." It's a time when entire nations pause to reflect on the immense loss of life, not just from that conflict, but from all wars. More than 60,000 Australians died during World War I, and the ripple effect of that loss continues to shape families and communities.But how does this history resonate with younger generations? Today's young people may not feel the immediate impact of global conflicts, but they live in a world shaped by them. The soldiers, airmen, and sailors whose service we remember on this day fought for ideals that still resonate—freedom, fairness, and unity. In many ways, these values are even more relevant in today's rapidly changing world.The Richmond RSL Sub-branch invites all members of the community, young and old, to the 2024 Remembrance Day service. As they gather at Richmond War Memorial, local school students will stand alongside veterans and military personnel, laying wreaths to commemorate those who came before them. It's a powerful visual reminder that, even though past wars may seem far removed, the legacy of service and sacrifice lives on.Involving schools and younger community members is part of a broader effort to ensure the importance of Remembrance Day continues to resonate. The Richmond RSL Sub-Branch hopes that by bringing together people of all ages, younger generations will see the relevance of reflecting on peace and the price paid for it."Remembrance Day is an opportunity for young people to connect with history in a meaningful way," a spokesperson for the Sub-branch said. "It's not just about looking back, but about understanding how the past shapes our present and future. The peace we have today was earned through great sacrifice."So, as Remembrance Day approaches, it's worth pausing to consider why we observe this tradition. It's not just for the older generations who remember the wars firsthand but for young people whose future is being built on the foundation of those sacrifices. This November 11, Richmond will once again honour that legacy—and invite a new generation to carry it forward. Details of the Remembrance Day Service:- Location: Richmond War Memorial, Richmond Park- Time: 10:55am, Monday, November 11, 2024 (assemble by 10:40am)- Covered seating available for veterans and older community members.

Students at Maroota Public School received an exciting visit, when the Westpac Life Saver Rescue Helicopter Service made a special landing on their school grounds. The visit, which also included students from MacDonald Valley Public School, allowed children to meet the rescue crew and learn about coastal safety and emergency procedures.In addition to the helicopter visit, around 12 volunteers from the Maroota Rural Fire Brigade and a fire truck were on hand to further enhance the students' understanding of emergency services.The Westpac Life Saver Rescue Helicopter Service operates from two bases in Sydney's La Perouse and Moruya on the South Coast. With a longstanding history of providing vital support to the community, the service assists in search and rescue missions, aerial surveillance, flood support, and coastal patrols. The service has recently marked 50 years of operation and has completed more than 100,000 missions without charging anyone for rescue efforts.Westpac Regional General Manager Mellissa Pearson said educating young Australians about safety was important, especially as they spend time exploring the country's beaches and waterways. "It's important to remind young Australians to stay safe no matter what time of year it is or what they are doing," Pearson said. She noted that the interactive session provided students with a unique opportunity to see up close the advanced lifesaving equipment used by the rescue crew, making the experience both educational and fun.Shane Daw, General Manager of the Westpac Life Saver Rescue Helicopter Service, highlighted the significance of teaching children how to stay safe outdoors and what to do in emergencies. "The helicopter has been called out to the area numerous times, and it's great to teach students about the role we play in helping the community," Daw said. "While we hope they'll never need us, if they do, we'll be there to help."The Westpac Life Saver Rescue Helicopter Service, supported by Westpac for 50 years, remains one of Australia's longest-running community partnerships.

By Kate Hughes, PhD2When experts disagree about PFAS risks to health, what can we do to protect ourselves?In the last 100 years, humans created many substances that caused pollution on a global scale. Think DDT and other persistent pesticides, or industrial chemicals like PCBs, and wastes like dioxins, which are among the most toxic of man-made substances. More recently, PFAS has emerged as a pollutant, including here in the Hawkesbury where groundwater is contaminated with fire retardants migrating from RAAF Base Richmond. But the Base is not the only source of PFAS. Fabrics and floor coverings, potting mix, outdoor gear, cosmetics and pizza boxes are among many everyday products that contain some of the thousands of types of PFAS. According to the US EPA, there are 15,000 classes of PFAS but not much is known about the health hazards that most of them might present.    So is this lack of data a problem for the community? Yes it is, but toxicity is not the only issue. We also have to understand how we get exposed and whether there is enough exposure to affect our health. Recently. I attended two scientific conferences where PFAS was front and centre of many of the presentations. PFAS origins, PFAS chemistry, sources of PFAS pollution, PFAS investigation, PFAS risks to health, PFAS risk to wildlife and PFAS clean up. What stood out was the divergence of expert opinions about risks to health. One leading Australian regulator stated that the risk was minimal when compared with others, while an American toxicologist described PFAS as multi-system toxicants that can affect a range of organs and systems in the body. Impacts on health accepted in many jurisdictions include cardiovascular problems, reduced birth weight, decreased response to vaccines, endocrine and immune system disruption, and liver and kidney toxicity.Other talks confirmed in my mind that despite assurances to the contrary, there are serious health risks linked to exposure to PFAS. The critical thing is the amount of exposure needed to cause damage. Again, as with the PFAS toxicity, experts differ in their opinions as do regulators. The variation in drinking water standards in different countries is a good example. The lack of agreement about toxicity and exposure is what is most troubling because risks are calculated using these two parameters. As risk assessors put it: risk = hazard plus exposure.So while the experts wrestle with the data and hopefully come up with practical recommendations to governments about minimising exposure to PFAS and cleaning up groundwater pollution, what can individuals do to protect their health? Given the many sources of PFAS, we are at a point where exposure happens just by being alive. So what to do? Recognising the many sources of PFAS is a start, and then taking action personally to avoid exposure where possible. The links below provide reader-friendly information that can help you understand more about PFAS, how exposure happens and what you can do about it.

Hawkesbury Council has released the Draft Hawkesbury Floodplain Risk Management Study and Plan 2025, outlining major recommendations to tackle future flood risks in our community. We’re digging through the details ourselves, but what stands out immediately is the potential impact on property owners who could find themselves on the downside of new flood planning levels and planning rules. You have until December 9 to make submission - it’s online at https://www.yourhawkesbury-yoursay.com.au Council is also holding info sessions where you can ask questions: Richmond Oval on October 12 (4pm - 9pm), North Richmond Shopping Village on October 24 (11am - 1pm), Wilberforce School of Arts on October 30 (10:30am - 12:30pm), and Windsor Mall on November 30 (5pm - 9pm). The study's brief was to look at the consequences of flooding on the community and measures to mitigate flood risks and impacts. See what you think. Measures investigated are outlined in the picture.