Hawkesbury App
Hawkesbury App
Voice of the People
Hawkesbury App

News


Parcel Fury As Templeman Demands Action
Parcel Fury As Templeman Demands Action

29 November 2024, 1:17 AM

Federal Member for Macquarie Susan Templeman has intensified her campaign for improved postal services following the closure of the Kurmond Local Post Office, challenging Australia Post to address mounting community frustrations.Residents have reported significant delays and difficulties collecting parcels since the local post office closure in September. "Residents from the Kurmond and Kurrajong areas have reported very long and frustrating wait times in accessing parcels," Templeman stated in a media release. "I've raised the complaints that I've received with Australia Post. This week, when I met with them in Parliament House, I again stressed the urgency to have this matter addressed."Speaking to Hawkesbury Post, Templeman said: "The closure of the Kurmond Post Office has thrust the community into a logistical challenge, with residents facing increasingly lengthy parcel collection processes.""The closure of Kurmond PO has had flow-on effects across multiple other post office locations, and there's no doubt the community deserves greater convenience for their package deliveries," she said. The bulk of parcels have been redirected to Kurrajong Post Office. Many people have reported using the Australia Post app to redirect their parcel deliveries to alternative post offices like Grose Vale and North Richmond. On Facebook, Karen Chapman wrote: "Download (the) Australia Post app and choose another post office to pick up all your parcels. It works well. I go to Grose Vale, no wait.” HP is aware of several others who have similarly redirected their parcels away from the Kurrajong Post Office to ease the pressure on wait times for themselves and others. On Facebook, Lyndon Russo suggested that "A larger shop front (for Kurrajong PO) might help as well as more staff," anticipating that the situation will only intensify as Christmas approaches.An excerpt from one email to Susan Templeman (posted publicly on social media) reads: "There is no need to offer to you this is a disaster - adding to the lack of infrastructure west of "the river". With the increasing population, the strain on the options offered is unimaginable, all of which are overloaded….with the ever-expanding Redbank & Belmont & Grose Vale (over) developments alone, it beggars belief how residents using that outlet will cope."Kurrajong Franchisee Mark Robinson insists the impact has been minimal. "Kurmond closing has hardly had any effect on Kurrajong PO load. It's about 7% extra work!" he wrote on Facebook on Thursday, 28 November, attributing the current challenges to the peak Black Friday and Christmas shopping periods.Community feedback tells a more nuanced story. Ryan Winter's frustrated Facebook post captures the sentiment of many: "The issue isn't the post office; the issue is the sub-standard delivery we accept in our area. The fact that it's 2024 and we can't get Australia Post to deliver a parcel to our properties, but Amazon can do it for free in 2 days is an absolute embarrassment."Templeman told the Hawkesbury Post: "I have been advocating for Australia Post to improve access to parcel deliveries and install parcel lockers at various locations well before the closure of the Kurmond post office."Proposed bespoke parcel lockers aim to provide residents with 24/7 package access, addressing current collection inefficiencies. However, there needs to be more clarity about their exact location, with conflicting statements from Mark Robinson and Australia Post. While Robinson suggested installation at Kurrajong Post Office "in coming weeks", an Australia Post email to one resident indicates plans for a locker at the Kurmond BP Station: "At present, Australia Post has plans to deploy a parcel Locker at the Kurmond BP Station and at present working with the network to support the community and the Post Office through the peak Christmas period," it said. Not all community members are critical. Kurby Kurby offered a more philosophical perspective on social media, imploring people to "Be kind and think of other people's situations," reminding fellow residents that compassion should prevail even in frustrating circumstances.Templeman remains committed to her advocacy. “Having a parcel sent to you shouldn't be a stressful or inconvenient experience, and Australia Post has the means to make it better in Hawkesbury," she said.

Largest Housing Development in Hawkesbury Kicks-off
Largest Housing Development in Hawkesbury Kicks-off

26 November 2024, 5:13 AM

The largest planned housing development in Hawkesbury's history is officially underway. Developers of the former Peels Dairy property on Terrace Road, Freemans Reach, have initiated discussions with Hawkesbury Council and begun outreach to community groups and the Hawkesbury Post to share their vision for the ambitious project.However, the glossy marketing material fails to accurately address the impacts of flooding on residents west of the Hawkesbury River but emphasises the developers' commitment to community collaboration. "We are committed to collaborating with, and listening to, the community to ensure we can achieve positive outcomes that deliver benefits for the entire Hawkesbury region," reads a message from Celestino, the company behind the project.Dubbed Hambledon Park, the development is expected to take 10-years to complete after rezoning and development approvals.The new website features scenic images of the undeveloped farmland bordering the Hawkesbury River and, like most developer marketing images it omits any visual representation of what the site will look like once thousands of homes are constructed and the farmland no longer exists. The developers have pledged to create a community that “gives back to the Hawkesbury region,” highlighting sustainability, local job creation, and amenities for "everyone" as key benefits. However, the isolation caused by flooding for prospective buyers, isn't mentioned. On the website’s Q&A section, the developers responded to their own question, “Will the project be impacted by flooding?” with:“Hambledon Park occupies an elevated position above the Hawkesbury River and is therefore not directly impacted by flooding from the Hawkesbury Nepean floodplain. In addition, specialist engineering consultants will be engaged to ensure that all elements of the proposed masterplan are designed to account for localised stormwater flows across the site.”The launch of the new website and development comes as many Hawkesbury residents voice growing concerns over the rapid proliferation of housing estates in the region. Critics fear the transformation of the semi-rural area into another poorly planned western Sydney housing estate, destroying the natural environment and threatening the character of one of Greater Sydney's last green belts.These sentiments have been reflected in recent election results and social media discussions.Celestino’s proactive approach to engaging the public highlights an awareness of this sentiment. The website launch signals their intention to be seen as working alongside the community as development plans progress.However, the scale of the proposed development has drawn scrutiny. Originally approved as a small rural subdivision with 25 lots, Hambledon Park could see more than 4,000 housing lots emerge on the iconic Hawkesbury Farm, transforming it into a potential new western Sydney suburb. The property, purchased for $60 million, is one of several major developments planned or underway west of the Hawkesbury River bringing approximately 7000 new homes to the flood prone region. These projects present significant challenges, particularly in areas with limited infrastructure and essential services.The recently approved Grose River Bridge, initially designed to handle traffic from the 1,399-lot Redbank development, may now be insufficient to support the planned population boom.A previous concept plan submitted to Hawkesbury City Council was knocked back in 2020 and included an Agricultural Enterprise Precinct, said to be based on Sydney Science Park at Luddenham, however there’s no sign of this in the information currently being circulated by Celestino. Neither is there now any mention of road upgrades to increase the capacity across the Hawkesbury River. Celestino has previously been involved in regional discussions, including evidence provided by their CEO, Matthew Scard, to a 2021 Parliamentary Inquiry regarding plans to raise the Warragamba Dam wall. "Celestino has become aware in the process of preparing documents for Hawkesbury Council that some of the access roads to our development... are subject to flooding," Mr Scard stated.You can read his testimony here Go here to read the Hambleton Park websiteArtist's impression: The iconic Peel's Dairy farm will be turned into the Hawkesbury's largest housing estate

Fashion With A Purpose
Fashion With A Purpose

25 November 2024, 7:03 PM

Windsor has a new addition with the opening of Reloved by Pink Finss, a shop that combines fashion with a meaningful cause. The store offers a variety of second-hand clothing, and every purchase and donation goes towards supporting local cancer patients and their families.Reloved is run by the Pink Finss Charity, which aims to help more than 400 men, women, and their families in the Hawkesbury who are diagnosed with cancer each year. The charity provides care, support, and essential services to those affected.“This shop isn’t just about clothing - it’s about funding our mission,” a Pink Finss spokesperson said. “Every purchase directly supports Pink Finss Charity to provide care and resources for our clients. When you shop and donate with us, you’re not just getting a great outfit or clearing out your wardrobe. You’re helping those who need it most.”Treacy, the manager of the new store, shared her excitement about being part of such a worthwhile cause. “I’m thrilled to be part of this wonderful organisation and to help give back to the community through Reloved by Pink Finss,” she said.She also spoke about the quality of the donations coming into the store. “The stock arriving is incredible, which shows just how much people in the community value Pink Finss. We’re excited to meet everyone and help them find something special for their wardrobe.”Reloved by Pink Finss is more than just a store; it’s a way for the local community to support those affected by cancer. By donating or shopping, residents are directly contributing to a cause that helps their neighbours during tough times.Whether you're looking to refresh your wardrobe or donate items, Reloved by Pink Finss offers a simple way to make a positive impact.

Residents To Have Their Say on Springwood Road Upgrades
Residents To Have Their Say on Springwood Road Upgrades

20 November 2024, 10:05 PM

The NSW and Australian governments are working to reduce flood risks in the Hawkesbury-Nepean,with the community invited to provide feedback on proposed improvements to a stretch of SpringwoodRoad that runs close to the Nepean River at Yarramundi.The proposed work aims to improve the resilience of evacuation routes to flash flooding throughtargeted drainage improvements at key low points.Drainage work will include new culverts, mounds, and channels to direct water away from the roadsurface to keep the road open for as long as possible in the event of flood evacuation.Federal Member for Macquarie Susan Templeman says the government is committed to tackling floodmitigation and preparation in her community.“We are taking tangible steps towards upgrading the roads in and around the Hawkesbury,” said MsTempleman.“The proposed improvements are based on extensive flood modelling and consultation with the NSWState Emergency Services (SES) and NSW Reconstruction Authority (NSWRA).”“We are now asking the community to have their say on these plans that are designed to help keepour roads open for longer when waters are rising, including during an evacuation.”Three sites have been earmarked for improvement on Springwood Road and the Rivatts Driveintersection.The proposed work is part of a $33 million joint commitment from state and federal governmentstowards planning for more than 100 infrastructure improvements as part of the Hawkesbury-NepeanValley Flood Evacuation Road Resilience Program.The program aims to improve flood evacuation routes to better withstand local flash flooding andincrease the number of cars that can evacuate during major flooding events.The program has identified more than 100 improvements to improve flood resilience along keyevacuation routes through the region.Consultation for Springwood Road follows the recent proposed improvements for the LondonderryRoad and The Northern Road flood evacuation routes. Feedback is being sought through to 24November 2024. See www.transport.nsw.gov.au/hnvferrp for details.

Commuter Delays From Monday For Sackville Ferry
Commuter Delays From Monday For Sackville Ferry

19 November 2024, 7:02 PM

Commuters using the Sackville Ferry will need to plan for delays as the service pauses daily from 9:30 am to 2:30 pm between Monday, 25 November, and Thursday, 28 November 2024. Transport for NSW has confirmed that the disruption is due to essential maintenance aimed at improving the safety and efficiency of the crossing.  Commuters will need to take alternate routes during the closure, which may significantly increase travel times, according to a statement from Transport for NSW.  Drivers can detour to the Lower Portland Ferry, adding around 20 minutes to their journey. For those on the eastern side of the river, River Road provides an option, while motorists west of the river can use West Portland Road. Alternatively, detouring through Windsor could add approximately 35 minutes to the trip, with eastern-side drivers taking Sackville Ferry Road, Wisemans Ferry Road, and Cattai Road, and those on the western side using Sackville Road.  Emergency services will retain access to the Sackville crossing during the work hours, but a delay of about 20 minutes is expected while the ferry is reset to allow for crossings, according to Transport for NSW.  The maintenance will involve concrete being poured over the beams at the ferry approach, which are used for mooring during high tides and emergencies. “Transport is improving the durability of the beams at the ferry approach, which are used for mooring during high tides and emergencies. We will be covering the beams with concrete, increasing safety for all ferry users and our workers,” Transport for NSW said in a statement.While the scheduled work is expected to conclude by 28 November, adverse weather conditions, including wind, flooding, and tides, may extend the timeline. “Our working hours are 9:30 am to 2:30 pm. When carrying out work on ferry crossings, conditions such as wet weather, wind, tides, and flooding can slow or stop the work. For these reasons, the scheduled work times provided can change or be extended. If works at Sackville Ferry crossing are complete before Thursday, 28 November, ferry service will run as normal,” Transport for NSW said. Transport for NSW is urging commuters to plan their journeys and allow extra time during the maintenance period. Live updates on ferry operations and traffic conditions will be available via Live Traffic NSW at 132 701 or livetraffic.com

Hawkesbury Council's $75k Secret Complaints
Hawkesbury Council's $75k Secret Complaints

18 November 2024, 7:00 PM

Hawkesbury City Council spent $75,000 last financial year handling complaints under the official "Code of Conduct," yet ratepayers remain in the dark about the specifics. Despite the considerable time and money involved, the process is cloaked in secrecy, with no details provided about who was investigated, the nature of the breaches, or the outcomes.  Eleven complaints were lodged against councillors or the general manager in the year ending August 31, 2024, according to Hawkesbury Council documents. Of these, seven were referred to a conduct reviewer, with five resolved at a preliminary stage. Four out of five investigations were discontinued, and one councillor was formally censured for breaches of multiple clauses of the Code. The matter was escalated to the Office of Local Government under the misconduct provisions of the Local Government Act.  The censured councillor was found to have violated standards prohibiting conduct likely to bring the council into disrepute, intimidate or verbally abuse others, or constitute harassment or bullying, among other breaches. Despite the severity of these findings, the identity of the councillor and the specific circumstances remain undisclosed, consistent with the confidentiality provisions of the complaints process.  Hawkesbury’s handling of misconduct complaints reflects wider issues in the governance of local councils across New South Wales. While the Model Code of Conduct is intended to establish minimum standards for councillor behaviour, a 2022 review commissioned by the former state government found the framework deeply flawed. The report criticised the system for lacking consistency, timeliness, and independence and noted the Office of Local Government’s limited capacity to address ongoing problems effectively. Despite operating for over a decade, the current framework has failed to reduce the volume of complaints or improve public confidence in the process.  Statewide, there were 1,143 complaints against councillors in the 2022/23 financial year. While some councils manage their conduct issues effectively, others have become repeat offenders. The State Government says the current code of conduct framework is overly complex, distracts from robust democratic debate and is being increasingly weaponised for political reasons. Changes proposed to streamline the Code would see minor complaints about councillor misbehaviour dealt with by a councillor’s peers and leave serious matters relating to conflicts of interest to be examined by the Office of Local Government. 

Grose River Bridge Approved After Years of Delays
Grose River Bridge Approved After Years of Delays

13 November 2024, 6:44 AM

After years of delays, Hawkesbury Council has approved the long-awaited Grose River Bridge project, estimating that construction will take about three years to complete. The controversial bridge is intended to ease the traffic burden caused by the Redbank development and the addition of 1,399 new housing lots west of the Hawkesbury River.Originally proposed to accommodate increased traffic, the bridge now faces a vastly larger challenge. A decade since its inception, developments in the area have surged, and more than 7,000 new homes planned or seeking approval west of the river- potentially transforming the semi-rural landscape into a sprawling outer suburb of Western Sydney. The full story on the housing developments is available - https://hawkesburypost.com.au/hawkesbury-braces-for-7000-strong-housing-onslaught/ .Whether the government or planning authorities have adequately accounted for the infrastructure needs of this future population remains unclear.In a statement, Hawkesbury Council said, “The bridge is being built in partnership between Redbank Communities, Transport for NSW and Hawkesbury City Council as part of a Voluntary Planning Agreement between Redbank and Council."The bridge and connecting roads will provide a crossing between Grose River Road at Grose Wold with Springwood Road at Yarramundi. Extensive community consultation has been conducted in the finalisation of this plan."With the finalisation of the development application, the project now moves into the land acquisition phase for the new bridge and road. The land acquisition process is expected to take approximately 18 months, with an 18-month construction program commencing soon after, HCC said.Plans are available on Council’s DA Tracker at https://www.hawkesbury.nsw.gov.au/plan-and-build/current-and-past-applications/da-tracking.

Corruption Inquiry Casts Long Shadow Over Redbank
Corruption Inquiry Casts Long Shadow Over Redbank

10 November 2024, 7:00 PM

Years after its approval, the Redbank development in North Richmond remains one of the Hawkesbury’s most divisive projects, its legacy tainted by accusations of political favoritism, backroom deals, and irreversible environmental change. What was once rural farmland west of the river has become a sprawling suburban estate, permanently altering the landscape and paving the way for further developments that many argue would never be approved under today’s standards - and never should have been approved back then.At the center of this controversy was former Liberal MP and Hawkesbury mayor, Bart Bassett, whose involvement in the project raised serious concerns about political influence over local planning decisions. The saga became a focal point of an Independent Commission Against Corruption (ICAC) investigation, casting a long shadow over the development’s origins.The Redbank project, spearheaded by developer Nathan Tinkler's firm Buildev, aimed to transform farmland on the outskirts of Richmond into a large-scale residential estate. Touted as a suburban oasis blending rural charm with modern conveniences, Redbank Communities sought approval for significant zoning changes to repurpose agricultural land for residential use. In 2012, Hawkesbury City Council approved the rezoning, despite concerns from residents, other councillors and environmental advocates who warned about the loss of farmland, flooding issues and pressure on local infrastructure.However, the approval soon became mired in allegations of improper political donations and backroom dealings. ICAC’s 2014 Operation Spicer inquiry into illegal donations by property developers to Liberal Party candidates brought Redbank into the spotlight. ICAC investigated whether Buildev, with financial stakes in the Redbank development, funneled money into political campaigns to sway decisions in their favor. One of the key figures under investigation was Bassett, who had been the Hawkesbury mayor and a state Liberal MP during critical stages of the Redbank rezoning process.The inquiry revealed that Buildev had directed $18,000 through another Tinkler company - the Free Enterprise Foundation, to Bassett’s 2011 state election campaign, a clear breach of New South Wales laws prohibiting political donations from property developers.Evidence also emerged that Bassett, while serving as mayor in May 2011, voted in favor of a residential land strategy that would benefit Buildev’s interests. These revelations cast doubt on whether the development had received approval on merit or due to political influence. Buildev co-founder Darren Williams was asked by Counsel assisting ICAC, Geoffrey Watson SC, during ICAC hearings, whether Bassett was in a position where he could assist Buildev. Williams told the inquiry: “You could assume that.”Watson replied; “It’s a hard cold fact that he could vote on council in favour of a Buildev proposal, correct?” “Yes,” Williams replied. Williams then told the inquiry at least some of Bassett’s funding for his election campaign had come from Buildev.Documents tendered to the ICAC show that years before Mr Bassett became a Member of Parliament, top Buildev executives met him at home and attempted to use political connections to "neutralise" critical voices on Hawkesbury council.Bassett defended his actions at the ICAC hearings, maintaining that his votes were based on council staff recommendations and denying that political donations influenced his decisions. “I reject this allegation and I look forward to my opportunity to clear my name,” Bassett said. “In the meantime I have decided to stand aside from the Parliamentary Liberal Party.”However, public skepticism remained high. In response to the growing scandal, Bassett was exiled to the parliamentary crossbench while the investigation unfolded. ICAC did not make findings of corruption against Bassett, though the inquiry undeniably tainted the Redbank project’s image. Bassett consults for Redbank today, and remains the President of a Hawkesbury Branch of the Liberal Party.Photo: Bart Bassett leaving the ICAC hearings in 2014.Amid the ICAC hearings, Hawkesbury City Council convened an extraordinary meeting to address the mounting public outrage over Redbank. Councillors voted to request that the NSW Government freeze any development applications for the project until ICAC had completed its investigation. Councillor Christine Paine, who was a councillor at the time, called for the freeze, and said; “The community is very angry, very disenfranchised with council, so this might start healing a little bit.”The motion to freeze Redbank was met with significant community support. Around 150 residents packed the council chamber, with many speaking out against the development. Kim Smith, a local organiser from the group ‘Hawkesbury Rates Disgrace’, said, “All they are asking is that any further developments out in North Richmond are put on hold until the ICAC releases their findings so that we know everything is above board.”Despite the council’s call for a freeze, Hawkesbury Mayor Kim Ford was the sole Councillor to oppose the motion. Ford was Bassett’s campaign director in 2011, and was parachuted into Council without a Liberal preselection at a 2010 by-election occasioned by the death of Mayor Rex Stubbs. Ford insisted that the planning processes had been “open and transparent all the way,” and that there had been no “backroom deals” or improper actions in the approval of Redbank.Meanwhile, Buildev had sold its stake in the Redbank project to the North Richmond Joint Venture (NRJV) in 2012. The NRJV maintained that it had never made any unlawful political donations and was not under investigation by ICAC. Nevertheless, the ICAC inquiry has sparked widespread distrust among Hawkesbury residents about the development, with many questioning the legitimacy of its approval process.

Sprinkle Me with PFAS
Sprinkle Me with PFAS

10 November 2024, 12:46 AM

Sydney Water and the Hawkesbury City Council operate the four water treatment plants in the Hawkesbury. They take in wastewater and sewage from across the region. Out the other end come two treated by-products: recycled “grey water” and sludge, also known as biosolids. The recycled water and sludge that these facilities produce are not tested for the cancer-causing PFAS chemicals - a group of nearly 15,000 Per- and Polyfluoroalkyl Substances. PFAS are referred to as forever chemicals because they do not break down in nature lasting hundreds, possibly thousands of years. Currently, there are no publicly available test results for PFAS on these waste products.The North Richmond Water Resource Recovery Facility (WRRF), Richmond WRRF - run by Sydney Water - and South Windsor Sewerage Treatment Plan (STP) and McGraths Hill STP discharge treated water into South Creek and watercourses, which flow into Redbank Creek and Rickabys Creek.Recycled water from the Richmond plants is used for irrigation by local institutions, including Western Sydney University and Richmond Golf Club. HCC sells recycled water for irrigation and toilet flushing, as well as using it to irrigate public reserves, including Berger Road Lake Reserve, Berger Road Reserve, Bounty Reserve, Bradley Road Reserve, Colonial Reserve, Mileham Street Reserve, and Cox Street Reserve.Along with areas around at least a dozen other military bases across the country the Hawkesbury drew a short straw and became one of Australia’s PFAS hotspots. The contamination came from RAAF Base Richmond where now banned firefighting foams that contained PFAS were used for decades. PFAS has run off the base onto the Hawkesbury River flood plain, into groundwater and soil and into the river, coming back and forth with the tide and regular floods to spread across the region.“The big thing is that a very, very, very small amount of PFAs goes a long way,” Associate Professor Ian Wright, a scientist at Western Sydney University says. “It's hard to visualise this, but it's like one eye-drop in 20 Olympic swimming pools that’s dangerous at that level. And the RAAF base used a lot of PFAS foams over a very long time.”Once PFAS gets into the food chain it stays there. As well as contaminating fodder that grazing animals eat, it can also, like mercury, biomagnify when animals such as chickens eat insects and platypus feed on invertebrates. Wright explained, “This means that lower level bugs eat the plant, then the chicken eats the bug, and the concentration builds up at higher concentrations, each level you go”.PFAS are not just harmful, they can be deadly and have been found by the World Health Organisation to cause a range of cancers, including kidney, testicular and thyroid, yet the Australian Department of Health claims the evidence is “limited”.The Australian Cancer Atlas, a project of the Queensland University of Technology and the Queensland Cancer Council, shows that the Richmond area has a prevalence of thyroid cancer that is 41% higher than the national average, although without further studies direct causation with PFAS cannot be concluded.Richmond resident Joanna Pickford was advised that her property had been contaminated by PFAS in 2018 and eventually gained a settlement from the Department of Defence as part of a class action on behalf of 30,000 people who live close to three military bases that was settled for $132.7 million, one of four similar suits.“I have hypothyroidism [an under-active thyroid], so does my daughter. I got it when I was 40 and my daughter caught it when she was 26. I've had two male cats that I have had from kittens, both had thyroid problems, and one of them died from thyroid cancer,” Pickford told the Post. As the Federal government moves to dramatically lower the acceptable amount of the cancer-causing chemicals in drinking water, the NSW government has belatedly offered financial assistance for regional councils to test for the so-called forever chemicals. But this is only for drinking water and any testing for wastewater plant products remains largely absent in the emerging national conversation about PFAS.“We don't know where PFAS is, because we're deliberately not testing for it. What is driving this? It's negligence because it is of great concern to people. I found it bizarre that the water industry has been so resistant to grappling with this problem”, Wright says.“If we're using recycled water in urban environments, and particularly in environments that might run off back into waterways, and particularly drinking water supplies - which in this case in the Neapan-Hawkesbury River - we should definitely have a good understanding of PFAS concentrations in recycled water”, said water engineer Professor Stuart Khan, head of the University of New South Wales Civil Engineering School. PFAS in biosolids is arguably even more concerning with about 500,000 tonnes of human waste used annually for fertiliser across Australia, introducing the chemicals directly into the food chain. Yet its producers don’t want to know.“Council is not required to test treated water for PFAS,” the HCC spokesperson said, adding that biosolids were taken away from the plants and used as fertiliser.“Sydney Water covers the cost for biosolids to be reused in agriculture, forestry, and compost markets,” a spokesperson for Sydney Water told the Post. In June, 2024 environmental action group Friends of the Earth released the results of a Freedom of Information request that showed Sydney Water has been testing for PFAS in biosolids - but not recycled water. Of the ten places where testing took place and elevated PFAS was found, Richmond yielded the highest concentration of PFAS.The Hawkesbury has dodged a bullet as biosolids are banned for use in the Sydney basin; instead they are sent into regional NSW.In Australia the wheels of government turn slowly, particularly in the case of PFAS. In September 2022 the draft National Environmental Management Plan 3.0 was released by the Department of Climate Change Energy the Environment and Water. It includes updated guidance on how PFAS should be monitored and managed, including in recycled water and sludge. Consultation on the plan closed in Feb 2023 but since then, nothing.In Europe relatively new EU regulations are being implemented by member states like the Netherlands and Germany. In the US, the Federal EPA released a PFAS action plan that included EPA Method 1633, a testing protocol developed to detect and quantify 40 specific PFAS in various environmental samples, including wastewater, surface water, groundwater, soil, biosolids. As well, many states have developed guidelines and begun testing biosolids for PFAS, given the risks of leaching into groundwater or being taken up by crops.As Australian governments at last begin to face up to the vast problems that PFAS presents, a focus on contaminated waste is essential. In the meantime, more than 1.2 million litres of recycled water is being fed back into the river system that supplies the Hawkesbury’s drinking water, or watering on a field or park near you. 

Richmond's Tribute to Arts Champion Margaret Thorne
Richmond's Tribute to Arts Champion Margaret Thorne

05 November 2024, 7:00 PM

Richmond School of Arts marked a milestone, recognising the significant contributions of Margaret Thorne, who has served on its board for an impressive 43 years, including 39 as President. In a gesture fitting for her dedication, the school named its “Green Room” after Margaret, to become the “Margaret Thorne Green Room” cementing her legacy in the building she helped shape and modernize over decades.One of Margaret’s proudest achievements was ensuring that the Richmond School of Arts became a place that meets community needs while preserving its historical significance. Despite its age - built in 1866 and originally opened by Sir Henry Parkes - the building now operates as a versatile venue for a wide range of community activities, from Zumba and Pilates classes to theater productions and community meetings.Since joining in 1977, Margaret has led extensive renovations and improvements to the Richmond School of Arts, transforming it into a fully functional and accessible community facility. Under her leadership, the school has seen the installation of a commercial-grade kitchen, air conditioning in both halls, an audio-visual system, updated lighting, and a major refurbishment of the Murray Wing and auditorium. These updates included security cameras, complete padded seating for 168 people, new ramps for accessibility, and other essential amenities that brought the historic building in line with modern standards.Margaret’s influence extended well beyond overseeing building improvements. She has been a consistent presence in the daily operations, spending two full days each week managing administrative duties, organising maintenance, handling bookings, and working closely with tenants. This work has been essential in maintaining the financial and operational stability of the Richmond School of Arts. Her responsibilities also include chairing monthly board meetings and addressing the day-to-day needs of the facility, all aimed at ensuring the building remains sustainable for future generations.The event also recognised Richmond School of Arts Treasurer, Katrina Roberts, who was awarded Life Membership for her 15 years of service. Katrina has worked closely with Margaret, supporting her efforts to strengthen the organisation and continue its development.Margaret’s connection to Richmond’s arts scene is long-standing. Beyond her work at the School of Arts, she was involved with the Richmond Players from 1954 to 2007, participating in productions and directing shows. This combined experience of over 70 years in the arts has made her a well-known figure within the Richmond community.Today, the Richmond School of Arts is a busy hub for the community, hosting everything from dance classes to church groups, weddings, and art shows. Margaret’s enduring work and hands-on involvement have been instrumental in making this possible. With her ongoing roles as Patron and Archivist of the Richmond Literary Institute, she remains deeply engaged in preserving and supporting the arts in Richmond. 

1-20 of 116