Workers constructing the new Richmond Bridge over the Hawkesbury River will be required to work from barges due to the water being so heavily contaminated with PFAS - dubbed "forever chemicals" - that it poses significant risks to human health and the environment. The extraordinary revelation, outlined in a Transport for NSW (TfNSW) report, highlights a glaring contradiction: government precautions for construction workers starkly contrast with ongoing assurances from the Premier and health officials about the safety of the region’s drinking water."To further minimise PFAS risk to human health, workers constructing the piers for the four-lane bridge from the Hawkesbury River would be in barges,” the report on the new bridge at Richmond stated.The Hawkesbury River, one of Australia’s most important urban waterways, supplies drinking water to tens of thousands of residents and is vital for agriculture, irrigation, and livestock production. Yet, the TfNSW findings reveal that PFAS levels in the Hawkesbury River exceed limits established under the 2020 National Environmental Management Plan (NEMP 2.0). Detailed on page 339 of the Richmond Bridge Stage 2 report, testing undertaken on behalf of TfNSW uncovered PFAS concentrations that breach outdated (conservative) thresholds, which have since been tightened globally to reflect the severe health risks posed by these chemicals.“...analytical results from the Hawkesbury River show that the PFAS concentration exceeded the adopted ecological health assessment criteria under the NEMP 2.0. If PFAS-contaminated water from the Hawkesbury River is reused during construction (such as for dust suppression), this could harm nearby waterways, flora and fauna in the area, and impact human health. This would be avoided. To further minimise PFAS risk to human health, workers constructing the piers for the four-lane bridge from the Hawkesbury River would be in barges,” the report stated. The document, signed off by senior NSW government bureaucrat Tim Webster appears to indicate that the government is well aware of the health risk to humans from PFAS exposure while maintaining public reassurances that Sydney’s drinking water remains safe.Sydney Water told the HP that it only tests for PFAS at its filtration plants, as only drinking water needs to meet the Australian drinking Water Guidelines (ADWG). Dams and rivers are raw water, not drinking water, and the ADWG doesn't apply to raw water.PFAS contamination in the Hawkesbury stems from decades of use of firefighting foams at RAAF Base Richmond. These chemicals have leached into groundwater, soil, and the river, spreading further with tides and floods. Associate Professor Ian Wright, an environmental scientist at Western Sydney University, previously told the Hawkesbury Post. “A very, very, very small amount of PFAS goes a long way. It’s like one eye-drop in 20 Olympic swimming pools that’s dangerous at that level. And the RAAF base used a lot of PFAS foams over a very long time.” PFAS bioaccumulate in the food chain, magnifying their impact. “This means that lower-level bugs eat the plant, then the chicken eats the bug, and the concentration builds up at higher concentrations each level you go,” Wright explained.These "forever chemicals" have been linked to cancers, including kidney, testicular, and thyroid, as well as other severe health conditions. Despite this, the Australian Department of Health maintains that evidence of harm is “limited.”The Richmond Bridge report also details plans for site inductions to inform workers about PFAS risks, surface water monitoring during construction, and management measures outlined in the project’s Construction Environmental Management Plan. “...Site inductions would inform workers about the PFAS risk. Additionally, surface water monitoring and/or management may be required during the construction program to manage potential ecological risks where required. This risk would be managed through implementation of a CEMP during construction as well as other safeguards and management measures outlined in Section 6.5.4” The Richmond Bridge Stage 2 report said.The Hawkesbury is not alone in facing PFAS contamination. Similar issues plague communities around military bases across Australia. The World Health Organisation has flagged PFAS as a cause of multiple cancers and other health issues, yet Australia while having recently updated its drinking water safety guidelines still lags behind global efforts to address the crisis.

TRAFFIC INCIDENT - WindsorAll directions traffic affected.Motorists traveling Windsor Wilberforce Road at Bridge Street/Freemans Reach Road be aware that a truck has crashed.Started today 4:46amAttendingEmergency servicesTransport for NSWHeavy vehicle tow truckAdviceExercise caution, allow extra travel time.Other AdviceThere is a diesel spill from this crashMore details to follow.

Plans for the long-awaited New Richmond Bridge have been unveiled, but a funding shortfall means parts of the project will be delayed until additional funds are secured.Transport for NSW confirmed that the $500 million allocated by federal and state governments will only cover the first stage of the project, known as Stage 2A. The second stage, Stage 2B, will remain on hold until more funds are sourced.“The proposal would be delivered in two stages, known as Stage 2A and Stage 2B,” a Transport for NSW report stated. “Should this REF be determined, and the already committed funding by the Australian Government and NSW Government released, Stage 2A would be constructed. This is expected to be complete by 2029. The timing of Stage 2B would be subject to available funding, and Transport will continue to seek funding in upcoming State and Federal budgets to deliver the rest of the upgrades.”Stage 2A, which is funded, features a new four-lane bridge over the Hawkesbury River, approximately 30 metres downstream of the existing bridge. The bridge will be built 10 metres higher than the current structure, designed to remain open during a 20-year flood event. The stage also includes:Widening of Bells Line of Road through North Richmond to create two lanes in each direction.A 1.7-kilometre bypass south of Richmond town centre, spanning the floodplain between Kurrajong Road and Castlereagh Road.A new shared path on the southern side of Kurrajong Road for pedestrians and cyclists.Conversion of the existing Richmond Bridge into an active transport route.Stage 2B, currently unfunded, will impact North Richmond and includes further widening of Bells Line of Road west of Charles Street and at Crooked Lane. Additionally parts of the project east of the river will also be impacted - a 1.3-kilometre bypass extension from Castlereagh Road to Londonderry Road, and upgrades to the Londonderry Road/Vines Drive intersection.The project’s Review of Environmental Factors (REF), the important hydrology report and designs are now on display, with Transport for NSW inviting community feedback until February 21, 2025. Construction of Stage 2A is set to begin in 2026. The Hawkesbury Post will provide additional coverage of the report over the next few weeks.Federal Member for Macquarie, Susan Templeman, encouraged residents to engage with the consultation process.“The release of the Review of Environmental Factors (REF) is the next stage of the journey which first started with the announcement I made with Anthony Albanese in 2010 for the first federal funding to tackle Richmond Bridge congestion and look into the options for a new bridge,” Ms Templeman said.“It’s great that people can now look at the proposed design for a new bridge and bypass of Richmond and provide their feedback. It’s important that the proposed four-lane bridge provides greater flood resilience than the current one and would remain open if flood events we have experienced since 2020 were repeated.“I urge all residents to take the time to read the REF, ask questions of the project team, and prepare their feedback by February 21, 2025.”For more information, residents can visit the Transport for NSW website to review the REF and view project designs. Community information sessions will be held in early February 2025.Become a Good Neighbour Support your local by giving great journalism a helping hand

Redbank’s development manager, Jock Douglas, is confident that Monday night’s extraordinary meeting called by Hawkesbury Council will not derail the company’s plans to progress their proposal to construct 300 - 350 new houses at Grose Vale.“We view the upcoming meeting as a procedural formality and do not anticipate any new developments from our side,” Douglas told the Hawkesbury Post.The meeting is an attempt by councillors who voted against the plan to allow more time for councillors and the public to consider the proposed housing development. At last week’s meeting, some councillors admitted they had not fully read the proposal documents before voting in favour of it, including new mayor Les Sheather.The rezoning proposal affects 35.41 hectares on Grose Vale Road. It would see primary production land rezoned residential, adding to the 1,399 lots already approved for Redbank. The new plan would allow housing lots to be subdivided into sizes ranging from 375m² to 1,500m².Hawkesbury Greens councillor Danielle Wheeler was highly critical of the plans.“This planning proposal is the beginning of a new round of subdivision applications that will irrevocably change the rural character of the Hawkesbury. For it to be pushed through this close to Christmas, before the Redbank Creek Flood Study has been completed, with no start date on the Grose River or Richmond bridges, and with so little time for the community to read the documentation and make their views known, is really very poor form by those councillors voting for this motion,” Clr.Wheeler told the Hawkesbury Post.“Hawkesbury is already on track to exceed our housing targets. This is not affordable housing, it’s not near transport, and it’s not what the community is telling us they want. It flies in the face of numerous State planning directions. It’s not our job to make developers happy. It’s our job to represent the community and do the best thing for the Hawkesbury,” she said.At the Council meeting last week, the Liberal-Labor alliance, with the support of Mayor Sheather, pushed the plans through. Councillors voting in favour were Sheather, Liberal councillors Mike Creed - who is also the new Liberal candidate for the federal seat of Macquarie - Sarah McMahon, Paul Veigel, and Jill Reardon, alongside Labor councillor Amanda Kotlash. Opposing the proposal were Independents Nathan Zamprogno and Mary Lyons-Buckett, Clr. Wheeler, and Shane Djuric from the Shooters, Fishers and Farmers Party. Independent councillor Eddie Dogramachi abstained from voting.The approval has sparked widespread criticism from residents and community groups, who claim they were blindsided by the proposal. Hawkesbury Council reportedly gave just four days for public review and submissions.In a statement to the Hawkesbury Post, Redbank said the new site willl integrate into the existing Redbank master planned development.“The Redbank Expansion Area is set to offer between 300 and 350 new homes, addressing urgent housing needs in the Hawkesbury region while maintaining a strong focus on sustainability and community wellbeing,” Redbank said.Despite these assurances, many residents strongly oppose the plans.Resident Tony Buccini wrote on Facebook, “This is an absolute joke. Do any of those councillors travel the route along Grose Vale Road and deal with the absolute chaos trying to navigate your way to North Richmond before you even get to the bridge? Not to mention the eyesore that this development has created for what was a beautiful rural setting. Why would any person with a real understanding of this issue vote to see more of it? Our roads, schools, shopping centres - none of it can handle an increased population. Council, just stop ignoring the obvious!”Another resident, Debbie Darlington, wrote, “What the hell! We don’t want any more houses here. Be prepared to lose all the trees along Grose Vale Road. They will cut them all down.”Resident Gary Smith added, “This is a real nightmare. This beautiful area I have called home for over 25 years is doomed. The real issue now is we need more infrastructure such as a new bridge, as many have called out. But if we get that infrastructure, then even significantly more development will quickly follow. I am just glad we have those Independent councillors that nearly every meeting are focused on what is best for the community rather than the major parties that generally aren’t.”Approximately 100 residents attended the December 10 meeting, while over 540 individuals submitted responses to a survey conducted by the community group Hawkesbury Environment Network (HEN). The survey revealed overwhelming opposition to the development, primarily citing concerns over inadequate infrastructure, traffic congestion, and issues related to flooding and fire.Speaking before the council, a HEN representative said there was a lack of services west of the Hawkesbury River, including no hospital or ambulance access, while another resident detailed existing flood damage from Redbank Creek.The meeting also saw heated debate among councillors. Clr. Wheeler proposed a motion to oppose the development outright, citing 11 specific concerns, including non-compliance with planning guidelines and potential public health risks. This motion was defeated. Clr. Lyons-Buckett moved to delay the decision, arguing that there had been insufficient time to review the reports. Despite support from Clr. Wheeler and other Independents, this motion also failed.Clr Lyons-Buckett told the Hawkesbury Post that the proposal relies on outdated data and questioned whether such zoning aligned with Council’s strategic goals. “Redbank’s move to rezone the land was always expected despite earlier promises that no further lots would be sought,” Clr Lyons-Buckett said.“...We submitted a rescission motion to give our fellow Councillors an opportunity to scrutinise the documentation in more detail, ask questions and listen to more community representation on this very important proposal,” she said.The site of the proposed development forms part of the historically significant Yobarnie Keyline Farm. This site is tied to the innovative Keyline system developed by P.A. Yeomans, a pioneer in sustainable farming. Despite the opposition, the December 10 vote cleared the way for the proposal to proceed to a Gateway determination by the Department of Planning. Tomorrow night’s extraordinary meeting is the last opportunity for councillors to reconsider their stance.Residents wishing to speak about the proposal at the meeting tomorrow night can find more information here: https://www.hawkesbury.nsw.gov.au/_resources/forms/address-council-meeting.

A young woman has lost her life in a single-vehicle crash on Tizzana Road, Ebenezer, early this morning.Emergency services were called to the scene around 7 am today, December 13, 2024, following reports that a grey Kia sedan had collided with a utility pole.Police from Hawkesbury Police Area Command arrived to find the driver, a woman believed to be in her late teens and the car's sole occupant, deceased at the scene.Authorities have established a crime scene, and investigations into the circumstances of the crash are underway. A report will be prepared for the Coroner.[stock photo: SCM Jeans]

Hawkesbury Council voted last night to support a planning proposal that would expand the Redbank development in Grose Vale, paving the way for up to 350 additional housing lots.The proposal will now progress to the next stage, known as a “Gateway determination,” which is assessed by the Department of Planning.The Liberal/Labor alliance with the help of newly elected, Liberal-aligned Mayor Les Sheather voted to push the plans to the next stage of the approval process. Councillors voting in favor were Les Sheather, Liberal Councillors Mike Creed, Sarah McMahon, Paul Veigel, and Jill Reardon, alongside Labor Councillor Amanda Kotlash. Opposing the proposal were Independents Nathan Zamprogno and Mary Lyons-Buckett, Greens Councillor Danielle Wheeler, and Shane Djuric from the Shooters, Fishers and Farmers Party.The expansion involves rezoning 35.41 hectares of land at Kemsley Park to add to the 1,399 lots already approved for Redbank. Currently zoned RU4 (Primary Production), the land would be reclassified into R2 and R5 residential zones, with some areas set aside as RE1 for public recreation.The site, located along Grose Vale Road, is part of the historically significant Yobarnie Keyline Farm. This farm was central to the innovative Keyline system developed by Percival A. Yeomans (1905–1984), which revolutionized Australian farming through improved soil health, water management, erosion control, and sustainable practices.The proposed Masterplan includes the removal of two dams, with one to remain. Lot sizes would range from 375m² to 1,500m², with smaller lots concentrated centrally and larger ones planned along the northwest perimeter.Subject site and surrounding Redbank development

Fireworks can bring joy to many, but they can also cause serious distress and safety issues - especially for horse owners in the Hawkesbury. Council’s draft Fireworks Policy isn’t about banning fireworks; it’s about creating a framework to ensure they’re safe and suitable for our community.By sharing your views, you’re giving Council the tools to object when proposed fireworks could be disruptive or harmful. This is your chance to shape a policy that balances celebration with consideration.Submit your feedback now and make sure your voice is part of the decision! Don’t wait - time’s running out. Submissions close 23rd December, 2024.You can read the draft policy here - https://www.yourhawkesbury-yoursay.com.au/draft-fireworks-policy

Hawkebsury Council will vote tomorrow night (Tuesday 10th December) whether to support a planning proposal to expand the Redbank development by rezoning 35.41 hectares of land, known as ‘Kemsley Park,’ to allow for up to 350 additional housing lots. The site, located along Grose Vale Road and formerly owned by the Peel family, is currently zoned RU4 (Primary Production). The proposed rezoning would create R2 and R5 residential zones, with a portion designated RE1 for public recreation. Kemsley Park, historically part of the Yobarnie Keyline Farm.The Masterplan indicates the removal of two dams, with one to remain. The lots would range in size from 375m² to 1,500m², with smaller lots dominating and larger ones planned for the northwest perimeter. This proposal would add to the 1,399 lots already approved for Redbank. It follows a recent Council decision to amend zoning, including allowing additional retail space, as part of a ‘housekeeping’ update to the Local Environmental Plan (LEP). You can read the plans here (Item 10). The recommendation in the business paper is for Council to endorse the proposal, enabling it to proceed to a Gateway determination by the Department of Planning.A spokesperson for Redbank said: “This expansion aligns with the goals of both Hawkesbury City Council and the NSW Government, supporting the region’s housing strategy and enhancing the quality of life for residents. Additionally, the project contributes to the Federal Government’s Housing Accord, which aims for “key in the door” housing solutions rather than just rezoned land. With a proven track record, Redbank Communities is well-positioned to help meet this national housing initiative, delivering homes that are ready for residents to move in and start building their lives.” “The planning proposal will go through various stages of the government approval process. At a later stage, it will be placed on public exhibition, giving the community an opportunity to review the details and provide their input.”The community can follow the debate live by attending the meeting in person at the Hawkesbury Council Chambers in Windsor at 6:30 pm tomorrow, or by streaming it online via the Council’s Facebook page.The proposed expansion. Image supplied by Redbank.

On July 14 Windsor Police took out a Interim Apprehended Domestic Violence Order (ADVO) against former Mayor Sarah McMahon, four months later without explaination they withdrew the order originally placed to protect her ex-boyfriend Matthew Bennett.The failure by Windsor Police to inform Bennett about the withdrawal of the ADVO represents a troubling lapse in duty of care. While the reasons for the ADVO’s withdrawal remain unclear, the lack of communication with Bennett raises serious concerns about the handling of domestic violence cases and whether alleged victims are adequately protected.As the protected party under the interim ADVO, Bennett was left to discover its withdrawal not through the authorities responsible for his safety but via friends and media reports. This is not a mere oversight; it is a fundamental failure. When an ADVO is withdrawn, notifying the person it was meant to protect should be an absolute priority. Failing to do so is more than neglectful; it undermines the entire purpose of such orders and even worse could present a serious risk to the protected person. Unfortunately, this failure by Windsor Police is far from isolated. According to lawyers and domestic violence workers spoken to by the Hawkesbury Post, it is an all too common scenario.The silence from NSW Police on this matter is notable. NSW Police wouldn’t answer questions from the Hawkesbury Post citing a “no comment” on matters relating to domestic violence. Why was the ADVO withdrawn? Why wasn’t Bennett notified of its withdrawal? Even if there are valid reasons behind these actions, maintaining public trust requires a certain level of transparency. Without it, speculation is inevitable - and ultimately, damaging.Compounding the issue, McMahon’s public comments (posted to her official Facebook account on 21 November 2024) about a "weaponised" domestic violence system add another layer of complexity. Her remarks, intentional or not, risk undermining the credibility of those who come forward with genuine complaints and further highlight the questionable handling of this matter by the police.It is impossible to ignore the question of whether this outcome might have been different if the alleged victim were a woman. Domestic violence transcends gender, yet male victims often faceless attention and empathy. Bennett’s experience underscores systemic biases that must be addressed, regardless of the specifics of this case.As Australia grapples with a domestic violence epidemic, police procedures must prioritise the protection of alleged victims. By failing to inform Bennett, the police have not only let him down but also jeopardised trust in a system meant to safeguard vulnerable individuals.Transparency and accountability are the foundations of public trust in policing. Without them, the credibility of the entire system is undermined. Windsor police owe Bennett, and the community, answers. Until then, public confidence in the system will again be tested.

The NSW state government has announced sweeping planning reforms it claims will address the housing crisis by fast-tracking the construction of new homes. Touted as the largest rezoning initiative in the state’s history, the reforms include a new approval pathway that removes councils from decision-making processes for some major residential projects. While the government insists these changes will expedite housing delivery and alleviate cost-of-living pressures, the move has sparked widespread backlash from councils and community advocates.Under the reforms, set to take effect in early 2025, development proposals meeting certain criteria will no longer require council approval. Instead, they will be assessed by a new Housing Delivery Authority (HDA) within the Department of Planning, Housing and Infrastructure. This unprecedented power shift has raised concerns about the potential for inappropriate developments, reduced community input, and diminished local oversight.At the Local Government Conference in Tamworth last month, more than 500 council delegates condemned the changes. Delegates voiced alarm at the erosion of local government powers, arguing that the reforms cater to developers at the expense of communities diminishing their ability to influence planning decisions in their community.Councillor Mary Lyons-Buckett said she had grave concerns over the announcement, calling it another blow to local democracy.  “The proposed changes reduce local input and community voices even further as this presents another in a long line of changes favouring developers over local people,” she said. “Further erosion of local democracy.”  Councillor Nathan Zamprogno was also critical of the plans. “The Liberal State Government took away the people’s control, through the elected Chamber, over assessing D.A’s back in 2017, but we still had some control over the approval of some larger proposals like the large scale housing developments proposed west of the river. Now Chris Minns wants to to fast-track developments without any democratic accountability at all.”The reforms will establish a state-led approval pathway for housing developments exceeding $60 million in Greater Sydney or $30 million in regional NSW, translating to projects averaging 100 homes and 40 homes respectively. The government asserts this will streamline the process by allowing rezonings and development assessments to occur simultaneously, reducing approval times by years.  The Premier defended the changes as a bold step toward solving the housing crisis.  “The Minns Government is doing everything in its power to tackle the housing crisis and encourage developers to build and boost housing supply and overall affordability,” he said.  “These latest reforms mean the State is taking control of major housing projects so that they have the attention they deserve and get through the assessment process much faster.”  Critics argue that the reforms prioritise developers’ interests over community needs. By sidelining councils, opponents fear that communities will lose the ability to shape their neighborhoods and protect against overdevelopment. The removal of council oversight, they say, risks allowing unsuitable projects to proceed unchecked.  Delegates at the Tamworth conference also warned that the fast-tracking process, while aimed at reducing bureaucracy, could undermine critical safeguards and result in poorly planned developments. Many expressed frustration that the state government continues to centralise power, leaving local councils with less ability to represent the communities they represent.  Despite government assurances that the reforms will alleviate councils’ workloads by removing complex applications, opponents remain skeptical. “This is about more than just streamlining processes it’s the government caving in once again to the powerful property lobby group,” one delegate said. “ We need to be ensuring communities have a say in how their towns and cities evolve.”  The Housing Delivery Authority, a key pillar of the reforms, will include senior state officials such as Simon Draper, Secretary of the Premier’s Department; Kiersten Fishburn, Secretary of the Department of Planning; and Tom Gellibrand, CEO of Infrastructure NSW. The authority will oversee projects qualifying for the state-led approval pathway, with the Minister for Planning and Public Spaces serving as the ultimate consent authority.  Proposals will be assessed on their merit with a “flexible approach” to planning controls, including incremental zoning changes. The government claims this dual process will remove barriers and deliver much-needed housing more quickly.  “Proposals in this pathway will not be required to be considered by councils for development and will benefit from an approval timeline that is potentially reduced by years,” a statement from the government said.

When Dave Graham, known to many as “Farmer Dave,” announced on Facebook last month that he’d packed up and moved further west to escape the urban encroachment plaguing Western Sydney and the Hawkesbury, it struck a chord with more than 2,200 people.Previously a resident of Box Hill and later Grantham Farm, this is the third time in 15 years that Dave has relocated to escape the rapid urbanisation eroding the last traces of farmland in the Sydney Basin, permanently altering the open spaces and rural lands that once defined the region. “When you live in Western Sydney, a reality is that the city keeps growing,” Dave told his Facebook followers. “As it has since 1788. More and more people are choosing Australia as home, which means I’ve got to keep moving. For the third time in 15 years, I’ve picked up stumps and moved further west to escape urban encroachment.”The decision came as Dave realised that the relentless development surrounding him was directly affecting his mental health. “It just started getting too much,” he admits. “It was about, it was about year and a half ago, when, we really did get developed out, and it was the increase in the traffic, it was the increase in the noise that was just unrelenting, and you no longer felt like you were in the Hawkesbury, like you're very much in just another part of Sydney. It was a progressional thing, but it did become unbearable towards the end,” he told The Hawkesbury Post.Dave’s journey has been nothing short of transformative. Earlier this year, he parted ways with RuffTRACK after five years of dedicated service - a decision that marked a significant turning point in his life. "Burnout is real, and it creeps up on you until you can't ignore it anymore," he reflects.  Since then, Dave has made remarkable changes: becoming completely sober, shedding 25kg, and spending much more quality time with his five children. His focus has been on rebalancing his life. "I poured an overwhelming amount of energy into building a lasting community service, and I feel confident it’s now in the hands of passionate people who will ensure its continued success," he says.Recently, Dave relocated to a peaceful ridge in Glossodia, seeking refuge in an area buffered by natural bushland and protected farmland.The response to his move was immediate and overwhelming, with many followers echoing similar sentiments. “That was our life until I got sick with leukemia,” one person wrote. Another added, “I moved from Rouse Hill after 25 years… place was becoming a nightmare.”Dave’s story mirrors the struggles of many rural residents on Sydney’s western fringe. Initially drawn to Box Hill for its open landscapes and strong sense of community, he says the area changed almost beyond recognition in just a few years.“The first time I moved was from Box Hill. And you know, that was a beautiful paradise only a few years back. There were Maltese market gardens, there were cattle, poultry and sheep farms. You felt really connected and now you can jump roof to roof and get from one side of Box Hill to the other now without leaving the roofs of houses,” he said.After leaving Box Hill, Dave moved to Riverstone’s Grantham Farm, where he set up RuffTRACK, a youth re-engagement programme that connected troubled young people with animals and the land. But even in the relative peace of Grantham Farm, urban expansion quickly followed. "One minute, streetlights were blaring through my window, making it hard to sleep. Then, houses started popping up on all sides, followed by a beautiful, big shopping Center across the road. Soon, it took up to ten minutes just to get out of the driveway because of traffic on Windsor Road. As a Bushy, I felt completely hemmed in."Growing up on a 100,000-acre property in southwest Queensland, Dave had always valued wide-open spaces and was feeling “caged in” and knew his mental health was suffering.“I was feeling that same thing. You know, it's just been hemmed in and caged in. So, my mental health was really suffering, and I could see that chain effect onto the young people as all of those developments started to pop up around what was a beautiful Wandin Valley. And I really feel like we're losing Wandin Valley to the concrete jungle.”He attributes much of the youth disengagement he deals with to the same kind of suffocating yet disconnected environment."A critical part of what we did when I was at RuffTRACK was connect kids to the country and community, giving them space to express themselves without judgment. We achieved this through the power of animals, dogs, and working with the land - growing food crops. It requires space, and it worked incredibly well. Over 150 young people came through my programmes, transforming their lives by developing connection skills and finding a real sense of belonging."Finding solace in Glossodia, Dave has moved onto a five-acre property 'Cooee Ranch', that offers the open space he had been craving. Surrounded by eucalyptus trees and overlooking flood-protected farmland, it feels like a sanctuary. “This wonderful place out here came up that is surrounded on all three sides by gum trees and an iron barks. And it's got everything that you would possibly want on a ridge above all the beautiful farmland that we know will never get developed out thankfully, because we have this beautiful thing called floods.”This new home also gave Dave the opportunity to continue working in a more tailored capacity with High-Risk Youths and his high-energy dog programs in a setting more suited to his programme’s needs."It's a home for DockDogs Australia, a sport that engages people with high-energy dogs. My focus is on supporting those who don’t fit the mold - whether that’s young people or dogs with intense energy giving them space to express themselves. Here, we do activities like K9 SuperWall, dog parkour, and k9 Ninja. It's a place for people to channel their dogs’ energy positively and have fun with them, using positive reinforcement."Dave's unique youth work approaches have become a lifeline for many young people who feel disconnected from society. Dave firmly believes that the space allows them to escape the pressures of urban life, reconnect with country, community and develop meaningful skills.Reflecting on the broader trend, Dave emphasises that the loss of rural areas is about more than just land, it’s about the future, the loss of connection with our country and what it provides us.“It’s really a problem not to see where our food comes from, to drive through farmland at the very least. Once you’re in the Sydney basin, it’s easy to forget that connection. There’s something grounding about driving past vegetable farms, orchards, and livestock, it reminds us of our link to the land. When we lose that, what are we?”“Already, farmers beyond the Great Dividing Range feel disconnected from city consumers; many city people no longer visit or even have country cousins.“But if, in the Hawkesbury, at least if people are driving to the local and Blue Mountains townships. They drive through farmland. They see their food, where it's grown, understanding through osmosis the change in seasons. They're at least connected in some capacity, and that helps our mental health, because you see where your food comes from. It's right there you've driven past, the orchards, the livestock, the market gardeners,” he said.As for Dave’s own move, he’s not looking back."Look, you've got to put your own oxygen mask on first, right? We all know that I had a personal break after I left RuffTRACK to focus on my own mental health. To give my best mentorship and guidance to these vulnerable young people who are desperate for it - kids who often turn to gangs or the wrong crowd because they’re looking for someone who cares, who values them and who sees them as the journey through trials of teenage hood. I need to be in the best possible headspace for that, but being surrounded by the urban insanity was no longer working for me.""And now, you're in a much better place now mentally?""Oh, absolutely. It’s fantastic."

Federal Member for Macquarie Susan Templeman has intensified her campaign for improved postal services following the closure of the Kurmond Local Post Office, challenging Australia Post to address mounting community frustrations.Residents have reported significant delays and difficulties collecting parcels since the local post office closure in September. "Residents from the Kurmond and Kurrajong areas have reported very long and frustrating wait times in accessing parcels," Templeman stated in a media release. "I've raised the complaints that I've received with Australia Post. This week, when I met with them in Parliament House, I again stressed the urgency to have this matter addressed."Speaking to Hawkesbury Post, Templeman said: "The closure of the Kurmond Post Office has thrust the community into a logistical challenge, with residents facing increasingly lengthy parcel collection processes.""The closure of Kurmond PO has had flow-on effects across multiple other post office locations, and there's no doubt the community deserves greater convenience for their package deliveries," she said. The bulk of parcels have been redirected to Kurrajong Post Office. Many people have reported using the Australia Post app to redirect their parcel deliveries to alternative post offices like Grose Vale and North Richmond. On Facebook, Karen Chapman wrote: "Download (the) Australia Post app and choose another post office to pick up all your parcels. It works well. I go to Grose Vale, no wait.” HP is aware of several others who have similarly redirected their parcels away from the Kurrajong Post Office to ease the pressure on wait times for themselves and others. On Facebook, Lyndon Russo suggested that "A larger shop front (for Kurrajong PO) might help as well as more staff," anticipating that the situation will only intensify as Christmas approaches.An excerpt from one email to Susan Templeman (posted publicly on social media) reads: "There is no need to offer to you this is a disaster - adding to the lack of infrastructure west of "the river". With the increasing population, the strain on the options offered is unimaginable, all of which are overloaded….with the ever-expanding Redbank & Belmont & Grose Vale (over) developments alone, it beggars belief how residents using that outlet will cope."Kurrajong Franchisee Mark Robinson insists the impact has been minimal. "Kurmond closing has hardly had any effect on Kurrajong PO load. It's about 7% extra work!" he wrote on Facebook on Thursday, 28 November, attributing the current challenges to the peak Black Friday and Christmas shopping periods.Community feedback tells a more nuanced story. Ryan Winter's frustrated Facebook post captures the sentiment of many: "The issue isn't the post office; the issue is the sub-standard delivery we accept in our area. The fact that it's 2024 and we can't get Australia Post to deliver a parcel to our properties, but Amazon can do it for free in 2 days is an absolute embarrassment."Templeman told the Hawkesbury Post: "I have been advocating for Australia Post to improve access to parcel deliveries and install parcel lockers at various locations well before the closure of the Kurmond post office."Proposed bespoke parcel lockers aim to provide residents with 24/7 package access, addressing current collection inefficiencies. However, there needs to be more clarity about their exact location, with conflicting statements from Mark Robinson and Australia Post. While Robinson suggested installation at Kurrajong Post Office "in coming weeks", an Australia Post email to one resident indicates plans for a locker at the Kurmond BP Station: "At present, Australia Post has plans to deploy a parcel Locker at the Kurmond BP Station and at present working with the network to support the community and the Post Office through the peak Christmas period," it said. Not all community members are critical. Kurby Kurby offered a more philosophical perspective on social media, imploring people to "Be kind and think of other people's situations," reminding fellow residents that compassion should prevail even in frustrating circumstances.Templeman remains committed to her advocacy. “Having a parcel sent to you shouldn't be a stressful or inconvenient experience, and Australia Post has the means to make it better in Hawkesbury," she said.

The December Edition of The Hawkesbury Post is out NOW!For a copy of the paper head to your local newsagent, service station, supermarket or read it online or on The Hawkesbury App.Our biggest issue yet, with 48 pages featuring some great investigative stories, Council's response to the Kmart trees and the local business awards "Winner's Feature".Happy reading.

The largest planned housing development in Hawkesbury's history is officially underway. Developers of the former Peels Dairy property on Terrace Road, Freemans Reach, have initiated discussions with Hawkesbury Council and begun outreach to community groups and the Hawkesbury Post to share their vision for the ambitious project.However, the glossy marketing material fails to accurately address the impacts of flooding on residents west of the Hawkesbury River but emphasises the developers' commitment to community collaboration. "We are committed to collaborating with, and listening to, the community to ensure we can achieve positive outcomes that deliver benefits for the entire Hawkesbury region," reads a message from Celestino, the company behind the project.Dubbed Hambledon Park, the development is expected to take 10-years to complete after rezoning and development approvals.The new website features scenic images of the undeveloped farmland bordering the Hawkesbury River and, like most developer marketing images it omits any visual representation of what the site will look like once thousands of homes are constructed and the farmland no longer exists. The developers have pledged to create a community that “gives back to the Hawkesbury region,” highlighting sustainability, local job creation, and amenities for "everyone" as key benefits. However, the isolation caused by flooding for prospective buyers, isn't mentioned. On the website’s Q&A section, the developers responded to their own question, “Will the project be impacted by flooding?” with:“Hambledon Park occupies an elevated position above the Hawkesbury River and is therefore not directly impacted by flooding from the Hawkesbury Nepean floodplain. In addition, specialist engineering consultants will be engaged to ensure that all elements of the proposed masterplan are designed to account for localised stormwater flows across the site.”The launch of the new website and development comes as many Hawkesbury residents voice growing concerns over the rapid proliferation of housing estates in the region. Critics fear the transformation of the semi-rural area into another poorly planned western Sydney housing estate, destroying the natural environment and threatening the character of one of Greater Sydney's last green belts.These sentiments have been reflected in recent election results and social media discussions.Celestino’s proactive approach to engaging the public highlights an awareness of this sentiment. The website launch signals their intention to be seen as working alongside the community as development plans progress.However, the scale of the proposed development has drawn scrutiny. Originally approved as a small rural subdivision with 25 lots, Hambledon Park could see more than 4,000 housing lots emerge on the iconic Hawkesbury Farm, transforming it into a potential new western Sydney suburb. The property, purchased for $60 million, is one of several major developments planned or underway west of the Hawkesbury River bringing approximately 7000 new homes to the flood prone region. These projects present significant challenges, particularly in areas with limited infrastructure and essential services.The recently approved Grose River Bridge, initially designed to handle traffic from the 1,399-lot Redbank development, may now be insufficient to support the planned population boom.A previous concept plan submitted to Hawkesbury City Council was knocked back in 2020 and included an Agricultural Enterprise Precinct, said to be based on Sydney Science Park at Luddenham, however there’s no sign of this in the information currently being circulated by Celestino. Neither is there now any mention of road upgrades to increase the capacity across the Hawkesbury River. Celestino has previously been involved in regional discussions, including evidence provided by their CEO, Matthew Scard, to a 2021 Parliamentary Inquiry regarding plans to raise the Warragamba Dam wall. "Celestino has become aware in the process of preparing documents for Hawkesbury Council that some of the access roads to our development... are subject to flooding," Mr Scard stated.You can read his testimony here Go here to read the Hambleton Park websiteArtist's impression: The iconic Peel's Dairy farm will be turned into the Hawkesbury's largest housing estate

Windsor has a new addition with the opening of Reloved by Pink Finss, a shop that combines fashion with a meaningful cause. The store offers a variety of second-hand clothing, and every purchase and donation goes towards supporting local cancer patients and their families.Reloved is run by the Pink Finss Charity, which aims to help more than 400 men, women, and their families in the Hawkesbury who are diagnosed with cancer each year. The charity provides care, support, and essential services to those affected.“This shop isn’t just about clothing - it’s about funding our mission,” a Pink Finss spokesperson said. “Every purchase directly supports Pink Finss Charity to provide care and resources for our clients. When you shop and donate with us, you’re not just getting a great outfit or clearing out your wardrobe. You’re helping those who need it most.”Treacy, the manager of the new store, shared her excitement about being part of such a worthwhile cause. “I’m thrilled to be part of this wonderful organisation and to help give back to the community through Reloved by Pink Finss,” she said.She also spoke about the quality of the donations coming into the store. “The stock arriving is incredible, which shows just how much people in the community value Pink Finss. We’re excited to meet everyone and help them find something special for their wardrobe.”Reloved by Pink Finss is more than just a store; it’s a way for the local community to support those affected by cancer. By donating or shopping, residents are directly contributing to a cause that helps their neighbours during tough times.Whether you're looking to refresh your wardrobe or donate items, Reloved by Pink Finss offers a simple way to make a positive impact.

The ex-partner of former Mayor Sarah McMahon has addressed questions from the Hawkesbury Post this evening, following the withdrawal of a police-issued Apprehended Domestic Violence Order (ADVO) against her. Bennett’s full response is provided below.McMahon had been under the constraints of the domestic violence order since July when police alleged she unlawfully accessed Bennett’s business premises and accessed his computer. No charges were laid against McMahon over the incident.Statement from Matthew Bennett"SamanthaMy last contact with Windsor Police was in late October when they requested me to attend Blacktown Court in February 2025 as a witness for them against Miss McMahon.My solicitor and I were not aware of a court hearing today. As the person protected by this ADVO, it is extremely disappointing that I have not been contacted by Windsor Police about today’s hearing or decision."I only became aware of this decision when friends informed me of the Hawkesbury Post article and Miss McMahon’s social media announcement.I chose to end my relationship with Miss McMahon.I am greatly disappointed that Miss McMahon once again used Facebook for our private, personal matters.When Windsor Police found Miss McMahon on my business premises without permission, I chose not to make a statement.I hope that all parties will respect my privacy during this time."

An interim ADVO against former Hawkesbury Mayor Sarah McMahon has been withdrawn. NSW Police made the application to withdraw the ADVO at Windsor Court this morning.McMahon had been under the constraints of the domestic violence order since July when police alleged she unlawfully accessed her ex-boyfriend Matthew Bennett’s business premises and accessed his computer searching for evidence of an affair. No charges were laid against McMahon over the incident.McMahon’s appeared outside the Court for the first time today. She was seen smiling while taking photographs of herself with her solicitor.

Heatwave Warning For New South WalesIssued at 02:50pm EDT on Sunday 24 November 2024Valid for Sunday 24 November 2024 to Wednesday 27 November 2024Severe Heatwave Warning for: Hunter, Metropolitan, Illawarra, South Coast and Southern Tablelands DistrictsHeatwave Situation for 3 days starting Friday 22nd November 2024FOR MORE INFO: http://www.bom.gov.au/nsw/warnings/heatwave.shtml

The NSW and Australian governments are working to reduce flood risks in the Hawkesbury-Nepean,with the community invited to provide feedback on proposed improvements to a stretch of SpringwoodRoad that runs close to the Nepean River at Yarramundi.The proposed work aims to improve the resilience of evacuation routes to flash flooding throughtargeted drainage improvements at key low points.Drainage work will include new culverts, mounds, and channels to direct water away from the roadsurface to keep the road open for as long as possible in the event of flood evacuation.Federal Member for Macquarie Susan Templeman says the government is committed to tackling floodmitigation and preparation in her community.“We are taking tangible steps towards upgrading the roads in and around the Hawkesbury,” said MsTempleman.“The proposed improvements are based on extensive flood modelling and consultation with the NSWState Emergency Services (SES) and NSW Reconstruction Authority (NSWRA).”“We are now asking the community to have their say on these plans that are designed to help keepour roads open for longer when waters are rising, including during an evacuation.”Three sites have been earmarked for improvement on Springwood Road and the Rivatts Driveintersection.The proposed work is part of a $33 million joint commitment from state and federal governmentstowards planning for more than 100 infrastructure improvements as part of the Hawkesbury-NepeanValley Flood Evacuation Road Resilience Program.The program aims to improve flood evacuation routes to better withstand local flash flooding andincrease the number of cars that can evacuate during major flooding events.The program has identified more than 100 improvements to improve flood resilience along keyevacuation routes through the region.Consultation for Springwood Road follows the recent proposed improvements for the LondonderryRoad and The Northern Road flood evacuation routes. Feedback is being sought through to 24November 2024. See www.transport.nsw.gov.au/hnvferrp for details.