Hawkesbury City Council spent $75,000 last financial year handling complaints under the official "Code of Conduct," yet ratepayers remain in the dark about the specifics. Despite the considerable time and money involved, the process is cloaked in secrecy, with no details provided about who was investigated, the nature of the breaches, or the outcomes.  Eleven complaints were lodged against councillors or the general manager in the year ending August 31, 2024, according to Hawkesbury Council documents. Of these, seven were referred to a conduct reviewer, with five resolved at a preliminary stage. Four out of five investigations were discontinued, and one councillor was formally censured for breaches of multiple clauses of the Code. The matter was escalated to the Office of Local Government under the misconduct provisions of the Local Government Act.  The censured councillor was found to have violated standards prohibiting conduct likely to bring the council into disrepute, intimidate or verbally abuse others, or constitute harassment or bullying, among other breaches. Despite the severity of these findings, the identity of the councillor and the specific circumstances remain undisclosed, consistent with the confidentiality provisions of the complaints process.  Hawkesbury’s handling of misconduct complaints reflects wider issues in the governance of local councils across New South Wales. While the Model Code of Conduct is intended to establish minimum standards for councillor behaviour, a 2022 review commissioned by the former state government found the framework deeply flawed. The report criticised the system for lacking consistency, timeliness, and independence and noted the Office of Local Government’s limited capacity to address ongoing problems effectively. Despite operating for over a decade, the current framework has failed to reduce the volume of complaints or improve public confidence in the process.  Statewide, there were 1,143 complaints against councillors in the 2022/23 financial year. While some councils manage their conduct issues effectively, others have become repeat offenders. The State Government says the current code of conduct framework is overly complex, distracts from robust democratic debate and is being increasingly weaponised for political reasons. Changes proposed to streamline the Code would see minor complaints about councillor misbehaviour dealt with by a councillor’s peers and leave serious matters relating to conflicts of interest to be examined by the Office of Local Government. 

A shock mayoral election result leaves the local Liberal Party with the whip hand for another two years.In a move that defies the results of the recent local election, Les Sheather has been elected Mayor of Hawkesbury, with Sarah McMahon selected as Deputy Mayor, maintaining a Liberal-aligned leadership team for the Council. Last night, 12 newly elected councillors were sworn in before casting their votes for a new mayor and deputy mayor to lead the council in the upcoming term. This followed last month’s local government elections, which saw significant voter backlash against major parties. The Liberal Party experienced one of the largest electoral swings in Hawkesbury's history, while the Labor Party lost a seat in the Chamber.The September election saw a remarkable shift away from large party-affiliated candidates, with Mary Lyons-Buckett, a leading independent councillor, receiving a strong mandate. Her “People Not Parties” group gained an extra seat, highlighting voter dissatisfaction with the status quo and delivering a clear message for change. The Liberal Party, led by former Mayor, McMahon lost more than 25% of its formal vote and barely held onto its fourth seat, reflecting a significant erosion of public trust. McMahon’s individual vote fell by over 36% compared to the last election.Despite a clear mandate for change, last night's Mayoral vote saw Liberal-aligned Independent, Sheather win against Lyons-Buckett, Labor’s Amanda Kotlash, and Independent, Nathan Zamprogno. Lyons-Buckett was backed by Greens Councillor Danielle Wheeler, Independent Tom Aczel, Zamprogno, and Kotlash in the final vote. Meanwhile, Zamprogno received two votes in the first and second rounds, supported by Shane Djuric of the Shooters, Fishers, and Farmers Party. Kotlash secured only her own vote and dropped out after the first round.Sheather, however, maintained solid support from all Liberal-aligned councillors throughout the rounds, and in the final vote, gained additional backing from Djuric and Kotlash. This solidified a right-leaning bloc on the Council and indicated that the controversial Liberal/Labor alliance will likely persist this term. With this alignment, Sheather secured a seven-vote majority, clinching the mayoral seat.At last months Council elections, Sheather’s Group garnered just 3.38% of the formal vote, representing about one-third of the support received by the Groups led by the other mayoral candidates. Personally, he secured a mere 0.55% of the vote, with his popularity slightly exceeding that of Kotlash, who received just 0.39%, amounting to only 139 votes from the community.The Deputy Mayoral election last night played out similarly. McMahon won the position after a drawn-out voting process that pitted Lyons-Buckett and her supporters against McMahon and her allies. In the first round, McMahon received six votes, with Lyons-Buckett trailing with four, while Zamprogno received two votes, supported by his own and those from Djuric. The tie was ultimately broken by lot, securing McMahon’s position as Deputy Mayor. The new leadership faces significant challenges in addressing critical issues that have fueled dissatisfaction among the Hawkesbury community. Key concerns during the election included inappropriate and rapid development, the protection of natural environments - particularly native animal habitats - and the integrity of councillors. Voters overwhelmingly supported candidates who prioritised greater transparency and sustainable growth, stressing the need for a Council that not only listens to its residents but also takes decisive action on their behalf.Sheather and McMahon will serve in their new roles until September 2026.

October print edition of the Hawkesbury Post out NOW!Find a copy at all Hawkesbury Newsagents.Or popular cafes, services stations, supermarkets and the public libraries.Email us to find a location closest to you.Or read online: The Hawkesbury Post OCTOBER 2024

The 2024 Hawkesbury Council election has delivered a significant shake-up, as voters turned away from the traditional powerhouses of the Liberal and Labor parties in favor of independents and minor parties. While some familiar faces remain, the dominance of the major parties has been decisively broken, with the Liberal Party suffering one of the largest local government swings in the region’s history.The biggest gain was made by Independent Mary-Lyons Buckett’s “People Not Parties.” They were the only Group to secure an extra seat in the Council Chamber, with Tom Aczel a new face amongst the 12 Councillors this term.The message from voters is unmistakably clear: dissatisfaction with the status quo has reached a boiling point. Former Mayor Sarah McMahon and her Liberal Party suffered a staggering blow, shedding more than a quarter of their 2021 vote. McMahon’s individual support plummeted by over 36% compared to the last local government election, highlighting a profound loss of confidence among constituents. The Liberals clung to their fourth seat by a mere nine votes, a nail-biting margin that underscores their fragile position. Meanwhile, the Labor Party, under Amanda Kotlash's leadership, faced a similar fate, seeing its representation halved as it lost one of its two seats. These results not only signal a dramatic shift in voter sentiment but also weaken the once-dominant Liberal-Labor voting bloc that controlled the previous Council.The result saw a surge in support for independent candidates and minor parties. Shane Djuric’s Shooters, Fishers, and Farmers (SFF) Party recorded a dramatic 34% increase in its vote compared to 2021, capturing 10.32% of the total formal vote. Similarly, Eddie Dogramachi’s Small Business Party has a strong swing towards it, securing 7.6% of the vote, a 47% increase from 2021. Independent Nathan Zamprogno, not only retained his seat but also received the largest individual vote of any candidate, almost 55% more votes than McMahon who had him expelled from the Liberal Party last year. McMahon’s individual vote collapsed, suffering a decline of more than 36% since the last election. The Greens, led by Danielle Wheeler, also saw a notable rise in support, with their vote increasing by almost 10%. Wheeler's party now holds 8.4% of the overall vote, compared to 7.08% in 2021, indicating that environmental issues are gaining more traction with voters.Wheeler described the election result as a sign of a major shift in the electorate’s priorities. “The result shows that people are increasingly choosing an alternative to the old major parties. More than half the Hawkesbury have voted for minor parties and independents with clear plans to make the Hawkesbury better. Now it’s time for us to work together to see those plans come to fruition. What’s really notable is the rise in the progressive vote, especially the People Not Parties ticket gaining two spots, which hasn’t happened since the days of conservative Mayor Rex Stubbs.”Liberal leader McMahon has seen her party's vote dive. In 2021, the Liberals commanded over a third of the total vote, but this year, their share fell from 34.4% to 24.6%. Despite an increase of 1,661 in the number of eligible electors, more than 3,615 people who voted Liberal in 2021 have switched their support to other parties or independents. This marks one of the largest local government swings in the Hawkesbury, as voters reject the status quo.The Labor Party, which in the past has aligned with the Liberals on key votes in Council, fared no better. Labor shed 26% of its 2021 vote, reducing its presence in the Chamber and losing influence. The much-maligned Liberal-Labor voting bloc, which controlled much of the Council's agenda in the last term, has been dealt a significant blow.Zamprogno, reflecting on the election outcome, said, "This result is good for the community because it returns control of our Council to citizens with independent voices and away from the dysfunction of the major political parties. It is clear that people have reacted badly to the acrimony and personal drama that made the last Council such a mess. Now, people expect us to focus on the basics, especially roads, but also finishing our new Local Environment Plan (LEP) and reintroducing a range of protections to accountability, our environment, and heritage that were stripped away by the last Council. I'm excited about the ability of the new chamber to make significant progress in these areas."Lyons-Buckett, whose "People Not Parties" group secured an additional seat, expressed a similar sentiment; “Since 2012, I have actively advocated for a 12-member Council to represent the Hawkesbury area, free from the dominance of major political parties. The election results reflect that our community shares this vision, as we've seen a notable decline in votes for major parties. The message is clear: people want us to focus on delivering essential services and facilities funded by their rates, ensuring a well-maintained road network, and preserving the unique character of our region. It’s evident that residents do not wish to see a continuation of the major party bloc of Liberal and Labor Councillors that dominated the previous two Councils and failed to meet the expectations of our community. I am looking forward to a fresh new Council term.”This election also saw a marked increase in the number of voters casting deliberate preferences. More than 13.3% of voters chose to vote "below the line," ensuring that their preferences were directed to specific candidates rather than the parties themselves. This is similar to the 13.9% who voted BTL in 2021, but one signal toward more deliberate voting was many groups also exchanging preferences, encouraging voters to number multiple squares above the line. This reduced the number of "exhausted" votes and ensured that voter preferences were influential throughout the counting process.The message from voters couldn't be clearer - Hawkesbury residents want new voices, independent perspectives, and a focus on the issues that matter most - roads, infrastructure, and preserving the character of the region.As the newly elected Council members prepare to take their seats, one question looms large: who will be the next Mayor? Unlike other councils, the Mayor of Hawkesbury is not directly elected by the residents but chosen by fellow Councillors. With the major party bloc fractured and independents holding significant influence, the decision on who will lead the Council is now wide open.

ROLLING COVERAGE OF HAWKESBURY COUNCIL ELECTIONThe Liberal Party has taken out the first seat on Hawkesbury Council having obtained quota before 9pm.This means that the number one candidate on their ticket - Sarah McMahon has been elected to Council.Shooters, Farmers and Fishers led by candidate, Shane Djuric is currently about 500 votes shy of reaching quota while the Independent party led by candidate Mary Lyons-Buckett and Labor led by Amanda Kotlash remain about 1000 votes from quota.(Edited) Voting shows a very high informal/other vote sitting at more than 21 per cent at 9pm tonight. These votes are potentially below the line votes that need clarification prior to being counted. In the last Hawkesbury Council elections the informal vote sat at about 5 per cent.9.34pm 14/9/24Pre-poll voting will have a significant impact on the Hawkesbury election results. This election 14,000 votes were cast through pre-poll, that’s 28 pct of the vote.10pm 14/9/24With more than 33,000 votes counted Shooters, Farmers and Fishers Party candidate Shane Djuric, Independent candidate Mary Lyons-Buckett, Independent candidate Nathan Zamprogno, The Greens candidate Danielle Wheeler, and Labor’s Amanda Kotlash will all be returned to Council.No vote counting on Sunday 15/9/24Initial Count Results can be found here for all venues: https://vtr.elections.nsw.gov.au/LG2401/hawkesbury/councillor#firstPreference

Hawkesbury Post contacted all candidates with questions to provide voters with comprehensive information for the upcoming local council election. We asked them to submit a brief summary of themselves and their stance on the top five issues that matter most to our community, as determined by our recent emoji poll.The responses we received were as diverse as the candidates themselves. Liberal Candidate Sarah McMahon, Labor candidate Amanda Kotlash, and Independent Les Sheather chose not to respond at all. In these cases we have worked with publicly available information and voting records to offer insights into their positions around issues.The top issues identified in our emoji poll include Councillor integrity, environment and conservation (particularly koalas), council services and pothole repairs, and development concerns - particularly regarding over-development. Group A: Danielle Wheeler (The Greens): I'm a scientist, community campaigner and permaculture practitioner. Since being elected in 2016, I've achieved increased heritage funding, support for the Women's Cottage, wetlands protections and increased tree canopy and town centre upgrades, increased community participation in council meetings and animal shelter reforms, and worked for a more inclusive Hawkesbury. I'm a hard worker and a fierce advocate with the intelligence and tenacity needed to ensure a thriving future for our community and our environment. Allister Claasz moved to the Hawkesbury at 17 to study Wildlife and the Environment at WSU Richmond. Having completed a science degree, he now lives in South Windsor and works on an organic farm in Bilpin.  In one sentence or your tagline, share what your team stands for: Building a better Hawkesbury - for now, and the future.Councillor Integrity: Integrity requires honesty, transparency, and sticking to principles. My time as a soldier and scientist shaped my commitment to these values. As a member of The Greens, I am committed to grassroots democracy, ecological sustainability, peace and nonviolence, and social justice. I’m bound by these principles and accountable to the community, not a faceless party machine. I want to see Council back in the community, holding regular public meetings and listening sessions in parks and community centres, through youth parliaments, and participatory decision-making. More social engagement, less social media. Councillors should be free to explain their votes, and Council’s media policy must be rewritten and focus on transparency, not defensiveness. If we all act with integrity, we should have nothing to fear.Environmental Conservation:I've been a fierce advocate for the environment and consistently fought for environmental protection, opposing harmful policies like the Rural Boundary Clearing Code and advocating for a Koala Plan of Management. I started the Wetlands Working Group and added wetlands protections across the Council's planning documents. I've worked to prevent destructive developments while increasing urban greening. Good development doesnt have to be environmentally damaging if planned correctly. The Hawkesbury community values our environment, and I’m committed to removing the Rural Boundary Clearing Code, securing a Koala Plan, and expanding our urban forest.Council Services and Pothole repairs:We need local road crews to quickly restore and maintain our roads after disasters, keeping jobs local, upskilling staff and prioritsing repairs based on need. We’ll advocate for more funding and higher-quality repairs. Instead of increasing hard rubbish collections, which less than a third of households use, we support expanding recycling efforts such as “Second-hand Saturday”, and introducing food and organics recycling earlier. We’ll ensure transparency in Council's budget, focusing on what the community values: roads, parks, the environment, and public spaces. Council should serve the community, spending public money on public assets with a sustainable future in mind.Development: Hawkesbury has met its housing targets, so there’s no need for more greenfield development on agricultural land. Future development should focus on infill near town centres and transport, meeting the need for smaller, more diverse, accessible and affordable housing. We must implement the revised LEP with the proper protections removed by Liberal and Labor in 2022. Council also needs to stand up to developers and the state government. Development should be something we control, not something that happens to us that we are forced to live with. I’ll continue to oppose harmful developments and advocate for planning that benefits the community and environment, not for developer profits.Group B: Mary Lyons Buckett (Independent): Bio: Mary has developed a deep connection and understanding of the Hawkesbury people and their vision through her background in scientific research, law, mediation, and small business, coupled with 12 years experience as a Councillor. Determined to finish what she started, Mary strives to see a functional, effective and reliable Council in which the people can have trust and confidence. She listens to the community to learn what characteristics are valued; which precious areas and assets require protection; which services are missing or need upgrade; and what opportunities can be embraced to support our local economy and overall wellbeing. Mary understands the need to balance future growth with preservation of the qualities that make Hawkesbury the unique, incredible place it is. Councillor IntegrityCouncillor Integrity: Integrity is a core component of good governance. Council decisions must be made with appropriate levels of transparency, accountability and fairness. To equip councillors to make good decisions, they must have a thorough understanding of community needs and expectations. The Chamber should be a place where integrity is paramount, and good leadership is essential to deliver that. Our ratepayers and residents must feel they have had meaningful engagement and that their feedback has been listened to, and when possible, translated into appropriate actions or policies. Perceptions that consultation is merely a box-ticking exercise lead to distrust and lack of confidence in decisions made and actions taken by Council. Environmental Conservation:I treasure the natural environment we are so fortunate to have, and for which we are custodians. It is one of our majordrawcards. With many pressures from proposed developments, land clearing and climate change, our precious environment is under threat of irreversible damage. Loss of connectivity and fragmentation of habitat will have wide-ranging impacts. I opposed opting into the Rural Boundary Clearing Code because I saw no evidence of any benefits, and feared its (mis)use as a tool for the destruction of valuable vegetation, sadly realised. I strongly support the completion of a Koala Plan of Management. I have persistently advocated for increased community participation in disaster management planning. Council Services and Pothole repairs:I strongly advocate increasing the number of traineeships and apprenticeships within Council, and developing teams within Council to carry out the regular monitoring and maintenance of our roads. Reliance on external contractors has not delivered timely and high-quality road repairs. I understand the community frustration about this. Excuses of inability to access contractors or materials to explain delays are unacceptable. I strongly promote betterment in infrastructure renewal, particularly in areas which are vulnerable to repeat extreme weather inundation. If we are proactive rather than reactive, monitor and maintain efficiently, we will reap the rewards of preparation being much cheaper than damage repair. Development: We can have growth compatible with the need to preserve Hawkesbury's valuable attributes if it is properly planned and designed. We have major constraints – floodplain, bushland, height restrictions due to the RAAF, and areas without reticulated water and sewer. We will never have massive amounts of medium-density housing like adjacent growth areas. We can utilise opportunities near transport corridors for a better blend of housing style. The delay of our LEP has left us vulnerable to poor planning decisions and missed opportunities around dual occupancy. We need up-to-date, concise planning documents to deliver well-planned growth for the future, with adequate supporting infrastructure and services. Group C: Amanda Kotlash (Labor):Candidate did not respond.What we know from public recordsCouncillor integrity:Clr Kotlash voted against reporting councillor attendance and engagement (Feb and May 2022), favoring a lack of accountability to the community. She supported Liberal Mayor Sarah McMahon's re-election. During the previous Council term, Labour aligned with Liberal councillors on at least 35 key votes, forming the "Lib-Lab Voting Block" with Independent Les Sheather. This bloc, often supported by the Mayor's casting vote, raised concerns about local governance dynamics and the balance of power within Council. She also backed the draft media policy limiting media access to Council statements.Conservation: Clr Kotlash moved to dismantle the Hawkesbury River County Council, a body specialising in river conservation. HCC is a member of HRCC along with other councils (August 24).She voted in favour of the Woodlands Pony Club sale (August 2024).She voted to postpone committing to funding the Koala Plan of Management until October 2024.She voted to allow rural boundary clearing without a DA, despite no koala mapping in place. Council has subsequently admitted this has been has been misused by people who want to clear their land (May 23). While Clr Kotlash initially voted against RBCC, her later voting pattern indicated support. In May 2023 an extraordinary meeting was called due to concern about tree felling and habitat loss. Parts of the motion were voted on individually, Clr Kotlash voted against actions to collect data on the RBCC or seek a pathway for Hawkesbury’s removal from the codeKotlash voted in favour of kangaroo signage on the Driftway in July 2023 (unanimous vote).Council Services and Pothole repairs:Labor Councillors Kotlash and Barry Calvert were the only two in the chamber to vote against the commission of an independent inquiry into the debacle that saw the cost of repair for the Cornwallis drains increase from $2.7 million to over $30 million in the space of 12 months. Their position was at odds with that of the State Labor government, which focuses on local government waste.Kotlash put forward an amended motion rejecting the $5,000 plan to tackle the growing crisis of abandoned cats in the area by allocating money to the Animal Welfare League for a desexing program. The Lib-Lab Block, including Les Sheather, supported her motion. Development:Clr Kotlash voted in favour of the Woodlands Pony Club sale (295 Sackville Road, Wilberforce) to pet food manufacturer Hypro.She voted in favour of development, including the community title subdivision at 6/21 Vincents Road Kurrajong (with Lib-Lab Bloc) (November 2023)Group D: Les Sheather (Independent):Candidate did not respond at all.What we know from public records. Councillor integrity:Les voted against reporting councillor attendance and engagement in May 2022. While part of the "Lib-Lab Voting Block," he was less consistent than the Labor councillors in aligning with the group. This bloc often opposed three to six other councillors, with the Mayor's casting vote tipping the balance in their favor. This pattern of voting raised concerns about the dynamics of local governance and the balance of power within the Council. Additionally, Les Sheather and Councillor Sarah McMahon served as Directors on the Windsor RSL Board, and Sheather spoke against gambling reform at the 2023 Australian Local Government Association National General Assembly.Conservation: He voted in favour of the Woodlands Pony Club sale (August 2024)Sheather voted to postpone committing to funding the Koala Plan of Management until October 2024He voted in favour of the motion to gag debate on the rural boundary clearing code (RBCC) and to allow the RBCC without a DA, despite no koala mapping. Council has subsequently admitted this has been has been misused by people who want to clear their land (May 23)Sheather voted in favour of kangaroo signage on the Driftway in July 2023 (unanimous vote)Development:Voted in favour of the Woodlands Pony Club sale (295 Sackville Road, Wilberforce) to pet food manufacturer HyproVoted in favour of development, including the community title subdivision at 6/21 Vincents Road Kurrajong (with Lib-Lab Bloc) Group E: Bob Gribbin (Independent):I moved to Oakville in 1986 and enjoyed the best life with what the Hawkesbury has to offer and in turn have given back through continuous volunteering. I started volunteering back in 1988 as Secretary of Sydney Showjumping Club when they jumped at Scheyville National Park. My current roles: President, Pony Club NSW Zone 26; Competition Secretary, Pitt Town Football Club; Representative Hawkesbury Sports Council; President, Oakville and Districts Progress Association; President, Rouse Hill Rams Little AthleticsThis is my first time running for Council. My Number two is Melissa Crane, who has lived in Pitt Town for many years and is very involved in the local community. She is Hawkesbury Volunteer of the Year 2023, President of Pitt Town Football Club, and director of Pitt Town and District Sports Club.In one sentence or your tagline, share what your team stands for: Hawkesbury First. Our Core Values are Respect for the Individual, Rate Payer Satisfaction, and Excellence in everything we do.Councillor Integrity: Integrity in public service means acting with honesty, fairness, and commitment to the public good. I will advocate for a code of conduct with regular ethical training, clear conflict-of-interest guidelines, and a transparent system for reporting breaches. I'll commit to regular self-assessment and encourage my peers to do the same. Public accountability is essential; I support publishing councillors' voting records and the reasons behind key decisions. I will also promote regular attendance at local meetings to empower the community and ensure transparency in governance. Environmental Conservation :This is an area where I have limited knowledge; in my work life, when I was given a project where I had limited knowledge, I would engage with appropriate subject matter experts. I would take the same approach on Council collaborating with other members like Danielle Wheeler to identify the best outcome for the environment. My home shares a boundary with Scheyville National Park. Back in the late 1980s, I was part of the protest group that opposed the area being turned into an airport, Jail, and housing commission before becoming a National Park where today we have native wildlife. The unique natural habitats for all native animals must be protected. Koala, platypus, echidna, kangaroo, all reptiles, and bird life must be preserved for future generations.Council Services and Pothole repairs:Flood events and increased heavy vehicle usage have severely damaged our road infrastructure, especially with the rise in potholes. I will push for a rapid response team to ensure potholes are repaired quickly and advocate for durable materials and innovative techniques to minimise future issues.Transparency and accountability are crucial. I will review service contracts and performance metrics to identify inefficiencies and push for more flexible rubbish collection options. I'll advocate for a clear breakdown of how rates are spent to ensure every dollar improves our community.To enhance service delivery and manage costs, I will focus on efficiency, innovation, and community involvement. This includes streamlining operations, partnering with local businesses, and involving residents in decision-making through regular feedback forums and surveys.Development: Development is progressing on both sides of the river, with more to come. We have two choices: let the State Government dictate our future or take control and shape it ourselves.We propose a balanced approach, allowing acreage to be subdivided into one-acre blocks while preserving the option to keep properties unchanged. All new blocks must be self-sufficient, with Enviro-cycle sewerage systems, solar or wind power with battery backup, and large inground water tanks to ease the load on existing infrastructure.This plan maintains Hawkesbury's rural character while allowing thoughtful development.Group F: Shane Djuruc (Shooter, Farmers, Fishers): I'm a proud Hawkesbury local, I was born in Windsor hospital and have been a part of our community for nearly 53 years. I'm a third generation honey producer and my family's apiary has been pollinating the Hawkesbury since 1960. I am a member of the Shooters Fishers and Farmers Party, not just because I'm a farmer, but because the SFF are a grass roots party that is made up of everyday people like you and me, just community members that strive to make a difference where it counts the most, and for me it's about bringing the community's voice back to council to make community led decisions, instead of a select few dictating to everyone else. Our dedicated team of Shooters Fishers and Farmers Party candidates believes that Council should be the heart of where we come together for the enrichment of the Hawkesbury and its community. My ticket no.2 is Bradley McGregor from South Windsor, no.3 is Brooke Djuric from Bligh Park, no.4 is Stephanie Fuller from Wilberforce, no.5 is Keith Levy from Thompson Square, and no.6 Gae Kelly from Pitt Town. Councillor integrity:Councillor integrity is very important to me and elected members should hold themselves to a higher standard as the community has put them forward to be their voice as it should be under the Westminster system. A lack of integrity from all levels of government is why I put my hand up to run in the first place, further, there seems to be a lack of accountability. I have been in regular contact the Shooters Fishers and Farmers Party UpperHouse members and they are aware of the issues concerning our Council, as well as other councils, and they have called on the government to push reforms that will help guide Councils in regard to integrity and delivery which will contribute to a better performing Council. Environmental Conservation: Many people are drawn to the Hawkesbury for its historic and rural charm, its significance in the Blue Mountains, and its unique wildlife. Given its proximity to Sydney, the Hawkesbury's distinctiveness must be protected. I fully support Koala mapping, as it will help ensure their survival and attract environmentally conscious residents. This approach can reduce development in sensitive areas and lower DA application costs outside of koala zones.Potholes, Rates, and Services:With a potential recession on the horizon, I will oppose any rate increases above CPI, especially given the current cost-of-living crisis. While road conditions are a widespread issue, I will work with SFF Upperhouse members to push for local government reforms to ensure Hawkesbury Council operates efficiently and productively.Development:I've always advocated for greater rights for individual homeowners. While large developments on the Hawkesbury's outskirts are clearing acres of trees, families struggle to build granny flats for their elderly parents. I'm firmly against mass development, especially west of the river, as it will destroy our community's identity. We lack the infrastructure to support such growth, and State and Federal governments show no foresight in addressing the needs of the existing community, let alone considering more development. Their proposal to duplicate Richmond Bridge, which won't alleviate township traffic or provide flood-free travel, demonstrates how little they consider our needs.Group G: Angela Maguire (Independent):Angela Maguire is an independent candidate at September's local government election. As a long-term Hawkesbury resident, small business owner, and award-winning entrepreneur, the community's concerns are my concerns. My group members are all locals who care about their community, with interests and expertise in local performing arts, sport for young people, STEM education, and agritourism. Meera Webster is my number two. A Hawkesbury Small Business Award winner and local arts personality, she is dedicated to improving the arts scene in the region.In one sentence or your tagline, share what your team stands for:Integrity - Representation - Stronger CommunityCouncillor Integrity: The role of Council is to establish the strategic direction for council staff to follow. Council staff can only do the best they can with the leadership they are provided. It's not just following the letter of the law, but it's also about being seen to do the right thing. My personal and professional reputation is being an ethical and principled person. I will take those attributes into Council and apply them accordingly. Councillors may need to engage in mandated governance training to ensure they are crystal clear about their obligations and responsibilities.Environmental Conservation:As president of Hawkesbury Harvest, I intimately understand the need to protect our natural environment so we can grow quality food, offer Hawkesbury and other Sydney residents green open spaces for recreation and encourage tourism, especially with the opening of Western Sydney Airport. We are all stewards of the environment for future generations. It'svital that we protect our unique and beautiful assets today for enjoyment and economic security tomorrow. If elected, I will support the creation of a Koala Plan of Management.Council Services and Pothole repairs:I won't be distracted by politicking and personal attacks. If elected, I will focus on the Council's core purpose to deliver these essential services. If we're struggling to deliver what we need to, look to other councils who are doing it better and learn from what they do. As a peri-urban council with a challenging rates base subject to multiple natural disasters, we need to lobby state and federal governments as a united council to get our fair share of funding and support. Development: I want to retain our beautiful peri-urban environment whilst allowing people to have affordable and livable homes. I don't see this as an either-or choice. However, we need to be a bit more creative in our solutions and have a little less greed from developers. We need appropriate infrastructure in place before any additional development, including emergency services. The Hawkesbury needs a variety of housing stock that accommodates our older population who will likely age in place at home. As someone who lives on the western side of the river, I am acutely aware of this challenge. Group H: Nathan Zamprogno (Independent):I was elected in 2016 as a Liberal but now proudly stand as an independent. I am a local high school teacher. I am very proud to stand by my record as the only Councillor that has sought to engage with residents through regular videos, newsletters, website and social media posts.The key issue facing voters in Hawkesbury is ensuring that the next Council is led with integrity. Our Council has been controlled by either Liberal or Labor Mayors for 17 of the last 20 years.They haven’t delivered, even by the metrics they themselves set concerning debt, fairer rates, or Council customer service performance. Many decisions seem oriented to please developers rather than the broader community. It’s time to restore Council’s leadership to citizens, not political parties. Councillor Integrity: Two-thirds of the meetings Councillors are required to attend are briefings, workshops, rountables and other events outside of the public, formal chamber meetings.I moved an initiative where this broader attendance, plus expenses and travel would be gathered and reported at the end of the Council term - a simple integrity measure already commonly practiced by neighbouring councils. My motion passed, only to be rescinded by the Liberal and Labor bloc a few months later.Then, I conceived and co-created the “Hawkesbury City Councillor Watch” page and website, which has been reporting on voting and attendance since May 2022.Environmental Conservation:I served five years on the board of the Hawkesbury River County Council (two as chair) charged with waterway health and weed control. I opposed our Council’s withdrawal and dissolution of HRCC.I have readily supported clauses in our LEP and DCP which strengthen environmental protection, such as ‘views and vistas’.I’ve decried the delay of the new LEP and DCP, which has dragged on for years because developers prefer the older, laxer rules.I support the proper funding of a Koala Mapping and Management strategy.In each of these, I have been frustrated by the current ruling party bloc and hope for change.Development: I have been a trenchant advocate for reform of local government to prevent property developers or those associated with them to improperly influence the political process.I oppose inappropriate development and decry the pressure placed on the Hawkesbury by the growth of the ‘sydney anthill’ which threatens our remaining agricultural land and sensitive ecological habitats.It became apparent to me that the only way in which I could ethically pursue these objectives was by leaving the Liberal Party.Council Services and Pothole repairs:Council faces an infrastructure backlog that will grow to over $160M over the next nine years without significant intervention. Our finances are simply inadequate to the task and this will get worse.The next chamber must give the issue of road repair significant priority, but I am surprised there is no disclosure from candidates about where they would stand on a future further rate rise. If this issue is ignored, it will be harder for the new chamber to declare a mandate to impose this, especially given a perception that our current system is unfairly weighted towards some property owners, and that the last rate rise did not deliver on associated capital works projects promised as sweeteners.In one sentence or your tagline, share what your team stands for:We stand for respectful, competent, hard-working representation. We’re ready to govern because the Liberal + Labor bloc have let us all down.  Group I: Sarah McMahon (Liberal): Did not respond at all.What we know from public records. Councillor integrity: Clr McMahon, was the former domestic partner of local property developer Matthew Bennett. McMahon and Bennett have consistently claimed Bennett is not a property developer under the definition in the Act and neither is McMahon by association. McMahon signed a candidate form declaring she had no association with such entities. McMahon voted to rescind reporting on councillor attendance and engagement. This means she was in favour of councillors not being accountable to the community through reporting attendance and performance.She voted in favour of the draft media policy, which would limit the ability of some media to access statements from or engage with Council. Subsequently, McMahon has boycotted the Hawkesbury Post and threatened legal action against it and its editor, Sam Magnusson.Conservation: Clr McMahon voted to dismantle the Hawkesbury River County Council, a body specialising in river conservation, of which Hawkesbury City Council is a member (August 24). She also supported the sale of the Woodlands Pony Club (August 2024) and voted to delay funding for the Koala Plan of Management until October 2024.Additionally, McMahon voted to allow rural boundary clearing without a DA, even though there was no koala mapping. The Council later acknowledged that this policy was misused by those wanting to clear land (May 23).McMahon voted in favour of kangaroo signage on the Driftway in July 2023 (unanimous vote)Council Services and Pothole repairs:Clr McMahon presided over the Council as Mayor during the last term, when the lack of repairs to potholes was noted, and the community's anger was palpable.  Development:Despite being found to be "not a developer," McMahon has had to recuse herself from multiple development projects before Council that her (now ex) partner or family members were involved in, such as the community title subdivisions at 6/21 Vincents Road Kurrajong.Voted in favour of the Woodlands Pony Club sale (295 Sackville Road, Wilberforce) to pet food manufacturer Hypro.Group J: Eddie Dogramaci (Small Business Party): I’m Eddie, a door-to-door salesman with a background in Textile Technology from the U.K. and further studies in Industrial Chemistry. I’ve lived in Hawkesbury for 36 years and am well-known among tradespeople, veggie farmers, turf growers, and manufacturing companies.Why did I enter politics? Small business owners, elderly residents, veterans, single parents, and even the homeless along the creek beds asked for my help with rising rates, council fees, protection, and job opportunities. Seeing their struggles, I decided to run for office. Since then, I’ve become one of the most outspoken and controversial Councillors. I've faced more penalties than anyone else for speaking out, protecting the vulnerable, demanding answers, and challenging management and major party councillors. They tried to silence me by interfering with my council phone, delaying emails, stopping my business card printing, and even attempting to expel me. In the past three years, I’ve exposed a $40 million failure in maintenance and management that could have been better used for roads, charities, women’s shelters, and helping those in need. I uncovered a $32.5 million secret loan, which led to attempts to have me removed for revealing it. I also highlighted the council’s failed lawsuit against a construction company, resulting in an additional $4.9 million in damages, costs, and compensation.I don’t have time for lies and empty promises. I don’t smile when asked why because there’s nothing to smile about when people are deceived and promises are broken. I’ll smile when ratepayers start smiling. Having lived, worked, and dealt across four continents, I’m grateful to Australia for giving me the chance to build a safe, secure future. This is my way of giving back and saying, "Thank you, Australia, and thank you, Aussies." That’s me - Eddie, no more, no less.Key Council Issues based on Voting record, where questions not addressed - Environmental Conservation:Voted with the Liberal and Labor Bloc to dismantle the Hawkesbury River County Council (August 24).He was the only Councillor to vote against Urban Greening (August 23).Voted with Liberal and Labor to rescind the RBCC - allowing rural boundary clearing without a DA.Recused himself from the Woodlands Pony Club sale vote as the Buyer (Hypro) is on his ticket (August 2024).Voted in favour of Voted in favour of kangaroo signage on the Driftway in July 2023 (unanimous vote).Development: He voted to endorse the site-specific amendment to the LEP to legalise subdivision on the Seniors Village Vincents Road Kurrajong site (November 2023). He recused himself from the Woodlands Pony Club sale vote as the Buyer (Hypro) is on his ticket (August 2024)

Just days after the secret sale of public land by Hawkesbury City Council to a pet food manufacturer became public, calls for land to be rezoned for industrial use have already begun. The $5 million approved sale of the bush block, which was conducted in secret, without public tender or community consultation, has sparked outrage, particularly as the land is rich in biodiversity and is home to the Woodlands Park Pony Club and has been for 40 years.Hawkesbury Council is burdened by significant debt, including but not limited to, a $35.1 million loan for a botched sewer repair project in Windsor and a $16.5 million dollar loan for infrastructure in the Vineyard Development area. In a confidential session last week, the Liberal-Labor alliance of councillors voted to green-light the sale of the block at 295 Sackville Road, Wilberforce to pet food company, Hypro Investments Pty Ltd. This decision was made despite the Council, just two months earlier, deeming the block inappropriate for the location of the new Hawkesbury fire control centre, citing the land’s high biodiversity value.Adding to the controversy, the newly formed Hawkesbury Business Group, chaired by Hypro Investments founder John Camilleri, is already advocating for Hawkesbury land to be rezoned for industrial use. The current RU1 zoning restricts industrial activities, but a change in zoning could significantly increase the land’s value. Without any rezoning local real estate agents said the $5 million price tag is significantly higher than the current market for such a block. Hypro currently operates from the industrial estate which sits adjacent to the pony club block.Jeff Ferrara, Secretary of the Hawkesbury Business Group, defended the sale in an email to the HP, arguing that it could help the Council reduce its debt while promoting economic growth through job creation. “The Hawkesbury Business Group encourages Council to consider the rezoning and sale of other suitable areas of operational land - this would simultaneously provide Council a method to pay down debt while boosting productivity in the region through job creation,” Ferrara said. Ferrara also said that the dealings about the land sale “were conducted independently between Hypro Investments and Hawkesbury Council, with no input or influence from the Hawkesbury Business Group.” Ferrara also said that the dealings about the land sale “were conducted independently between Hypro Investments and Hawkesbury Council, with no input or influence from the Hawkesbury Business Group.” He added that on February 9, 2024, Hypro began discussions with the Council's Property Manager. and one week later, on February 14, Hypro Investments submitted an offer to purchase the property. On August 1, Hypro accepted the Council's counter-offer for the land.HCC refused to answer questions about the sale, citing confidentiality. The HP also sent questions to re-contesting councillors, Liberal’s Sarah McMahon, Jill Reardon, Paul Veigel, Independent, Les Sheather and Labor’s Amanda Kotlash who voted to sell the land. The HP has yet to receive a response. You can read the questions below.The sale has left the Woodlands Park Pony Club homeless, once its lease runs out, raising serious concerns about the Council’s priorities and public trust. The club, a vital part of the Hawkesbury’s equestrian community, was not informed of the sale until it was listed in the Council business papers.  Local residents took to social media to express their outrage. Melinda Strachan voiced her concerns about the impact on local youth, saying, “Taking away recreational grounds for children and forcing them back inside on their devices. What a great move.” Another resident, Tabatha Hunt, criticised the decision’s broader implications, stating, “Forcing horse people further west to open up acres for development.” Cassandra Chiarelli urged the community to take action, declaring, “Surely this couldn’t go through! The Woodlands Park Pony Club (and agricultural land/activities) are an important part of the community. We need to inundate the council with objections to let them know it’s not okay.”Environmental advocates have also expressed alarm, pointing out that the land is home to threatened species and serves as a critical wildlife corridor. Richie Benson commented on the sale’s ecological impact, stating, “This site is home to several plant communities which are Threatened Ecological Communities (TEC’s). Within these plant communities, there are three threatened species which require our full protection and preservation.” He further emphasised the importance of the land as a wildlife corridor, a critical factor in maintaining biodiversity in the area.Councillor Nathan Zamprogno, who opposed the sale, supported a successful rescission motion bought by Green’s Councillor Danielle Wheeler for the matter revisited by the newly elected council in October. Zamprogno urged residents to elect representatives who will prioritise transparency and community interests over secretive deals that benefit private entities. “I signed the rescission motion to have the matter brought back to the new council in October. If you want this turned around, elect a different Council,” Zamprogno stated.The situation has left others questioning Council’s growing disregard for the cultural and economic contributions of the equestrian community. Mel Jacobs wrote on Facebook, “Such an important place for local riders young and old to come together. Council is very out of touch with just how big and important horse activities are in their own government area that has one of the highest numbers of horses per capita.”As development pressures mount in the region, public lands traditionally used for sports and recreation and the natural environment are increasingly at risk, pushing long-established clubs like Woodlands out in favour of commercial interests. The Woodlands Park Pony Club, determined not to close its doors despite this setback, is seeking urgent discussions with the Council regarding the future of their lease. “We appreciate all the community interest,” Keddie said, “Our club does require new grounds and WILL NOT be closing down.”Questions:1: Given that the item on the agenda had a public portion and a confidential portion, why did you choose to move the entire debate into confidential when there was a public expectation that this would be debated openly? 2: Wouldn’t council’s divestment of a significant asset normally be the subject of extensive consultation and then either a public auction or tender? Why was this deemed inappropriate in this case? 3: Would it be ethical to take nearly $6 million from a potential purchaser knowing they would unlikely realise that value through a rezoning? 4: If the same land was deemed inappropriate for the location of the new fire control centre, why do you believe that it would be appropriate for a dog food manufacturer to use the same land to extend their factory?

Have you ever wondered why some potholes on Hawkesbury roads get fixed quickly while others linger for ages? Or why has the Council just not approved and moved forward on the Richmond Bridge or specific DAs? You may be a young, first-time voter wondering why Council elections matter.The answers lie in understanding Australia's three levels of government—who's responsible for what, what we can reasonably expect from our councillors, and why it's important to have your say. With a council election coming up on 14 September, it's worth knowing how to manage your expectations of what councillors can feasibly deliver and how to understand when candidates promise things they will never be able to deliver because they are beyond their remit. The Three Tiers of GovernmentAustralia's government structure is designed to be a well-coordinated team, each tier having specific roles yet working together for the greater good. 

Local council elections in New South Wales, Australia are set for September 14. Hawkesbury residents will choose 12 councillors for our local council. If you're over 18 and registered to vote, you must vote. Find your polling station on the elections.nsw.gov.au website.You'll get one ballot paper. It'll have group names above a line and 6-8 names in each group below the line. Ungrouped candidates (those running alone) will be listed below the line.To make your vote count, select the minimum number of candidates shown on your ballot. You can vote either "above the line" by ranking groups or "below the line" by ranking individual candidates. Because of the way our votes are counted (preferential voting) the more numbers you mark on the ballot, the longer your vote counts - your first choice may not make it through, but your second or subsequent choices might. You must vote above OR below the line—not both!Voting above the line:Put a '1' next to your first choice group. This means you're voting for all the candidates in that group in the order they are listed. You can rank more groups by writing 2, 3, and so on in order of preference. This is the easiest way if you want the lead candidate in a group to get in.It's important to note that if you vote above the line, don't write anything below it.Voting below the line:Write '1' next to your first choice, '2' for your second, and so on. Make sure you pick at least the minimum number of candidates as directed. Choose below the line if you want to select specific candidates from one group in your own order or vote among candidates from different groups by name. If you vote below the line, don't write anything above it.FAQsHow do I vote to ensure that my favourite candidate has the best chance of success?First, put your favourite candidate at number 1. Candidates often provide how-to-vote cards, which give you an idea of how they would like you to vote to give them the best chance. You don't have to follow their how-to-vote suggestions. If they lead a group, voting above the line is your best option. How can I vote for one or more candidates in a group but avoid having my vote count toward one or more others in the same group?This is where below-the-line voting comes into play. You can vote for people within a group and avoid one or more particular candidates in that group. Your vote will not be allocated to that person. You must ensure you vote for the minimum number of candidates below the line. How do I vote for an ungrouped candidate?Ungrouped candidates are listed below the line, so you must vote below the line. Make sure you vote for the minimum number of candidates required. You can ask for help if you need it, and you can take someone to the voting booth with you if you need to. Your vote matters, so make it count.The polls close at 6 p.m. on election day. The ballot boxes are then unsealed, and the papers are sorted and tallied. Multiple counts are conducted before the final results are announced.Candidates may designate scrutineers to monitor the ballot counting process. These observers oversee the voting and tallying procedures to ensure the election is conducted fairly and properly.Watch this VideoHow are votes counted?We use a preferential voting system that ensures your vote counts for as long as possible. Preferential votes are tallied until a candidate receives more than half of all the votes.On polling day, the vote counters check who everyone selected as their top choice and sort them into piles.They then total up all those votes and see if any candidate has more than 50 per cent.The candidate with the fewest votes is removed if no candidate has enough votes.The vote counters then return to the ballot papers of voters who voted for the eliminated candidate as their first choice and check who they picked as their second choice.Those votes are allocated to the remaining candidates. This process continues until one candidate has over 50 per cent of the votes.If a voter's first choice doesn't succeed, their second choice might.We love this video that explains it clearly

AThe GreensDanielle WheelerAllister ClaaszMatilda JulianDebbie PatonBrian CrowtherKaren KobierBPeople Not Parties - IndependentMary Lyon- BuckettTom AczelEmma-Jane GarrowPeter RyanStacey O’TooleRichie BensonKayte MurphyTara VigourouxCLaborAmanda KotlashWendy DaviesSimon GriffinAnita ArtlettChristopher HavilandDIndependentLes SheatherAndrew CadmanKris WatersGerard HodgskinDave CoaldrakeMichelle TaparaEIndependentBob GribbinMelissa CraneLynette BrandWendy CampbellElise SmithAnton RaunjakFShooters, Farmers, FishersShane DjuricBradley McGregorBrooke DjuricStephanie HillKeith LevyGae KellyGIndependentAngela MaguireMeera WebsterMelanie CarrJames CleverKirsten RadunzJohn MaguireHIndependentNathan ZamprognoDonna PellewDavid BallPhilip PriceJoel BaltaksJessica DicksonILiberalSarah McMahonMike CreedJill ReardonPaul VeigelWarwick MacKayNatasha BennettJSmall Business PartyEddie DogramaciRodney GaleaPeter MuscatHanif BismiThomas ChiarelliEsma Dogramaci

In the lead-up to the 2024 NSW local government elections, the official ballot draw for the Hawkesbury Council took place at 2 p.m. today, determining the order of candidates in the upcoming election.Greens candidate Danielle Wheeler clinched the top position on the ballot, followed by Independent Mary Lyons-Buckett and Labor’s Amanda Kotlash. Former Mayor Sarah McMahon drew the second-to-last spot, while former Liberal and now Independent candidate Nathan Zamprogno was positioned just ahead of her in spot H. The complete list of candidates, in order of the draw, can be seen in the table below.It’s been a successful few days for Wheeler, who secured council approval on Tuesday night to fund The Women’s Cottage, enabling them to expand support services for local women and children affected by domestic violence. Additionally, she managed to delay the council’s covert attempt to sell a public land parcel with significant biodiversity value without a public tender or auction.Hawkesbury residents will have the opportunity to select from 62 candidates vying for 12 positions on the Hawkesbury City Council. The Council is currently composed of a Mayor and eleven councillors. Notably, former Labor Councillor Barry Calvert and Liberal Councillor Patrick Conolly are the only two incumbents who will not be seeking re-election. Among the fresh faces are local businesswoman Angela McGuire and Independent candidate Bob Gribbin.Campaigning is already well underway, with many candidates launching their platforms on social media and through the Hawkesbury Post. Former Hawkesbury Mayor Sarah McMahon has initiated her re-election bid on Facebook, despite not receiving the necessary endorsement from local Liberal Party members, as required by party rules. This election cycle presents additional challenges for McMahon, who will be campaigning without the support of her former campaign manager and boyfriend, Matthew Bennett. Furthermore, McMahon is preparing for a court appearance just five days after the election, following her recent arrest and the imposition of an AVO last month.Below is the official list of Hawkesbury candidates in the order they will appear on the ballot following today’s draw.

The Hawkesbury region is home to the most genetically diverse koala population in Australia, a distinction that underscores the area's ecological importance. However, as the Hawkesbury Post has reported many times these iconic marsupials are now classified as endangered, facing an uncertain future. The primary threat to their survival is habitat loss, driven by ongoing development, and by the application of the Rural Boundary Clearing Code in the Hawkesbury. Despite this, the Hawkesbury Council has yet to implement a Koala Plan of Management (KPoM) to safeguard these vulnerable animals from further habitat destruction.The absence of a KPoM is alarming, considering the increasing pressure on koala habitats, according to the Hawkesbury Environment Network. “As urban development encroaches on the natural environment, koalas are left with fewer places to live, breed, and thrive. Without immediate action to protect and preserve these critical habitats, the survival of Hawkesbury’s koalas hangs in the balance,” Nick Soudakoff, Secretary of the Hawkesbury Environment Network said.Environmental advocates and concerned residents are calling on the Hawkesbury Council to take decisive action. A petition has been launched, urging the Council to fund the KPoM, which would establish guidelines and protections for koala habitats within the region. The petition highlights the situation's urgency, noting that without a KPoM, koala populations could continue to decline, potentially leading to their extinction in the area.“Now is the time to implement the KPoM given that over next few years we are going to see more and more pressure for suburban development in the Hawkesbury,” Soudakoff said.“Housing development often fragments Koala habitat and brings noise, dogs, light, and vehicles close to habitat, threatening the established koala populations. The knock-on effect of development can extend far beyond the immediate area,” he said.The petition will be presented to the Hawkesbury Council on Tuesday, August 13, at 6:30 PM. Organizers are hoping for a strong show of community support, both in the number of signatures gathered and in attendance at the Council meeting. The message is clear: Hawkesbury’s koalas need protection now more than ever, and it is up to the community to ensure that their voices are heard.The petition can be accessed here: :https://www.hen.org.au/fund-the-koala-plan-of-management/

Local businesses around shopping precincts in the Hawkesbury are increasingly angry over ongoing parking issues impacting their operations and bottom lines. Owners are repeatedly fined for parking near their own businesses, forcing them to frequently move their vehicles throughout the business day. After years of upheaval due to COVID-19 and flooding, small businesses in the Hawkesbury - the backbone of the local economy - have been doing it tough. Foot traffic is down, and the cost of living crisis is keeping customers away. However, businesses say that rather than looking for ways to assist them during these times, rules and regulations imposed by Hawkesbury Council are making it harder.Businesses in the main shopping strips of Richmond, North Richmond, and Windsor say the parking rules - which make no allowances for business owners who need to park all day - are costing them dearly and making it nearly impossible to operate on a daily basis. Nicola Hayford-Hobbs, owner of Hawkesbury Herbs on Windsor St, Richmond, said the lack of all-day parking for business owners is infuriating. "We have a limited section of all-day parking, which fills up quickly. If you get here by 8:30 am, all the spots are gone. The rest of the parking is either one-hour or four-hour, which means we have to move our cars constantly. This is incredibly disruptive, especially when we can't leave our shops unattended," she said.Hayford-Hobbs estimates that the parking fines have cost her and her two staff about $5,000 over the past three years. "The worst time is Christmas. You can't run errands within an hour, and there's no leniency from the parking officers. They don't care that I can't close the store if there are three people in there," she said.Other small business owners who spoke to the Hawkesbury Post echoed her concerns. They also said they had raised the matter with the council, but to no avail. When asked about the problem, a Council spokesperson said Council has not received "official" requests for longer parking for local businesses. "Council has not received any official requests by business owners or workers at North Richmond to allow them to park for longer periods of time," the spokesperson said.“The success of local businesses relies on a high turnover of parking within customer car parks such as the one at North Richmond. Council supports these needs by enforcing timed parking limits at this car park,” the spokesperson added.This claim, however, appears at odds with the experience of businesses and also contradicts evidence in an email sighted by the Hawkesbury Post. Hazen Quinn, owner of Words and Pixels, wrote an email to Mayor Sarah McMahon dated June 7, 2024."Whilst I understand that you have parking limits for a reason, what I cannot understand is why we cannot pay for a parking permit. For example, $200 per car per year to allow us parking within the shopping centre. You could provide a sticker at minimal cost to the Council and make an extremely healthy profit. I know from speaking to other shop owners and some staff that purchasing a parking permit to avoid moving cars every two hours would be an option most would take. This could be applied to the whole of Hawkesbury and be a guaranteed source of income without the added cost of employing extra parking officers," Quinn wrote.Clr McMahon responded that Council is in the process of engaging consultants to investigate the issue, a process that would take at least nine months. "Staff have scoped out the consultants' brief to undertake the strategic review and parking study for our four main town centres, including North Richmond. This review will take approximately nine months to complete, followed by the next steps for implementing any recommendations. Until then, I can't provide any further advice other than to park lawfully," she wrote.Business owners are skeptical about this approach. "Engaging consultants when they could just issue special parking permits for shop owners and staff seems like a huge waste of ratepayer money in my view. It's not rocket science," said one business owner who wished to remain anonymous.Quinn also voiced dissatisfaction with the current parking situation in North Richmond. "The parking area has a two-hour limit for everyone. As shop owners, and after speaking to other owners in the same situation, we do not understand the need for such extensive patrolling of the car park. Nor do we understand why there isn't an allowance for shop owners and employees."Quinn highlighted the practical issues and financial burdens caused by the current parking enforcement. "Since May 23 we have been fined $360 to simply park in the shopping centre near our shop to work," Quinn said. "Our cars have been vandalized and damaged, which is one reason we park our cars close to the shop so we have camera footage of any incidents to our vehicles. Other business owners have parked their cars on the street, and they've been damaged or had things like batteries stolen."Another shop owner in Richmond, who did not want to be identified,  said the local car parks are not evenly distributed in terms of parking regulations and as a result distort foot traffic to shops.He said Coles has approximately 400 parking spots, with 34 all-day parking spots, 50/60 one-hour spots, and four-hour parking bays. However, the carpark between East Market Street and West Market Street has approximately 290 parking spots, 120 of which are all-day parking. There are 16 one-hour spots and the remainder four hours.“The (West Market Street) car park has become like a morgue because nothing moves around, we have customers complaining all the time because they cannot park, You’ve got to adjust the parking lot in all the areas and make them equal, so everybody has a chance to run a business, go to work, and the customers to have a parking spot. The way it is now, nothing works.”The parking issue affects business owners, their customers, and delivery services. "Couriers have to park down the road and carry heavy loads to our shops because there's no available parking nearby," Hayford-Hobbs said. "It's just not practical."Clr McMahon's response has done little to alleviate the frustration of the business owners. "It defies belief that this is still an issue," Hayford-Hobbs said. "Issuing parking permits is a simple fix that would support small businesses already struggling due to other challenges like flooding. Instead, we're stuck in a cycle of fines and frustration."